Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Need to make the warhead more destructive with wider blast radius. As a Shia I’m conflicted with the moralism of our faith. Trying to stay true to the original message of of the imams and the prophet, but I’m also a fan of Walid Ibn Khalid. I believe both the Sahabas and the Ahlul E Bayt principles can be applied at given any given situation. The world is ruthless and Muslim blood is very cheap. I’m not offering my family and kids as martyrs to anyone.Usually 650 kilograms for most of our missiles. K-4 can carry 1,800 kilograms.
This is wrong israil, centcom and their pets in Gcc hsve 100% interception record so farLow res satellite imagery shows Iran destroyed missile warehouse in Ramat David air base in north Israel
View attachment 200819
View attachment 200820
Before and after images
32.662156,35.181650
This is another sign of defeat that Trump is now using international bodies to pressure Iran, international bodies that he has denigrated and withdrawn funding from since he became President.
«If you have a guy down the street who keeps vowing to kill you, would you allow him to get the deadliest weapon available?»Please stop your slander for it is haram. I have never claimed what you are falsely claiming. Shame on you!
And next time you lie, say it to my face and tag me.
I hear what you say but its all speculation. I think colonial experiments casulties are far higher than they admitI’m sure they had damage, but one advantage they have compared to Iran is that they can send their entire population to bomb shelters (to prevent casualties), and they have multi layered missile defence systems, as well as US missile defence systems in a small area of land.
I am sure there was damage from the Iranian strikes (not everything was intercepted), but the effectiveness of Iranian missiles only improves when they fire in huge salvos for prolonged periods.
To summarize the offensive capabilities of both countries, while Iran’s missiles are no slouches, for them to be more reliable and have better effectiveness, they need to go for prolonged periods.
Israel can cause more reliable damage, more precision and more explosive attacks on Iran from the air than vice versa, at least for a short period. Iran’s missile warheads do not carry a huge warhead (obviously) to cause as devastating the damage.
But the severe limitations of Israel’s air campaign are that they cannot sustain this for more than 2 weeks against Iran. Iran can go on for months, and give Israel the decisive blow (if we exclude the Samson option).
There is more evidence of Israel hitting Iran harder, verified by their strike on the petrochemical plant. Iran also doesn’t have the same level of defence systems to reasonably defend against a short, shock and awe Israeli aerial assault.
Compare interception/prevention rates of Israeli attacks by Iran versus interception rates of Iranian attacks by Israel, you’ll get your answer
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.