krash
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
War. Casus belli
Exactly. So, US just carved a niche that didn't exist. And now orange wants arabs to pay 20%... keeping pace, right?
So, protecting your own territory is a tool of war? Keeping and aggressor from the other side of the world is critical to Iranian defense.
That is funny. The MoU is between the aggressor and the aggrieved party. Which is why it had the billions set aside for reconstruction... thaf was not reconstruction of anything in US.
Maybe US should have signed it with someone call it whatever...
And listen, I have no reason to complain, protest and object. It is what it is at the end of the day.
The MoU is null and void... So, another change...
Why start a protection racket and ask 20%... I mean...
Yes... Brits did have colonies here and they seemingly transitioned. US established it's neocolonial presence largely in last 30 years.
Well, that would by extension... right? Iran wouldn't want the US presence for it's own sake. The racketeering is an extension of American presence... hmm and before the US invasion how was that... don't just make stuff up as you go along.
If it doesn't then move along... you are defending the undefendalble... US doesn't need your counsel to do what it does... it will... inspite of you...
What are you even typing, bud? You make up nonsensical facts, are answered, and then proceed to provide nonsensical counter-arguments to arguments that were never made.
1) "Why is Hormuz up for negotiations?" -> "Because it was shut down by Iran" -> "War. Casus belli"........What?
2) "Iran blocked the Strait for its security concerns" -> "No, it blocked it to use economic pressure as a tool of war" -> "So, protecting your own territory is a tool of war?"........What?
3) Iran is blocking the Strait so that the US can't carve the niche that wouldn't exist if Iran wasn't blocking the Strait?
I'll time myself out if you can't formulate a coherent post.
Last edited:




