VCheng
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
We will have to "wait and see" (TM)![]()
Hey, you trademarked MY line!
You can have it, O Wise Meme Lord!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We will have to "wait and see" (TM)![]()
That isn't my post, and I disagree with it entirely. There's a 70km distance. This is no longer 1980s where people fire Scud-B missiles that can go off by tens of kilometers lol Even Ansarallah is in possession of missiles with a CEP of less than 20m. Nice try to deflect though.Now, for the rest of your post, please note there is a post above saying clearly that allowing the use of military bases close to Makkah places Makkah itself at risk from an Iranian attack due to its proximity.
Tell that to your Army that has filled the Green Zone of Baghdad with military targets. A region known for being the seat of administrative and diplomatic buildings.That logic works both ways, of course, as I mentioned, that close proximity of military targets to civilian assets places them at risk.
Anything is possible right now.
That isn't my post, and I disagree with it entirely.
Tell that to your Army that has filled the Green Zone of Baghdad with military targets.
And February has 28 days and the sky is blue and therefore you are wrong and the US is evil.Yet the post clearly says what I said it says.
I'm sure Iran is less genocidal and criminal, and evil, than the US and if we ever decide to target those systems, we will make sure that parents will not be forced to evacuate their children from a hospital dedicated to kids with cancer.Why? That makes it a fair target if Iran decides to attack it. Please go for it, if it helps Iran's war effort.
Fair is fair.
It doesn't matterA February has 28 days and the sky is blue and therefore you are wrong and the US is evil.
I'm sure Iran is less genocidal and criminal, and evil, than the US and if we ever decide to target those systems, we will make sure that parents will not be forced to evacuate their children from a hospital dedicated to kids with cancer.
You know, if it were the thread for the US perspective on war, you had already been thread banned for petty bickering. Be thankful to @Persian Gulf that he's handling here quite well and professionally, unlike your friends on the other thread.
I'm sure Iran is less genocidal and criminal, and evil, than the US
It doesn't matter
Iran at this point has to right to target anything belonging to the US, civilian or military, pre-warning or not
apparently itās something about Chinese interference in American elections. Not related to Iran.Any thoughts on what Trump will announce Thursday night during his address to the Nation? I am guessing making a case for ground forces?
Yeah, itās not possible to reconcile with the MOU wording, at least during the first 60 days.Even if the US/Israel hadn't, it would be unwise of Iran to not do it, if it believes that it can attain its desired results.
However, the absurdly dense arguments that are being presented here just for the sake of cheerleading one side, or the other, are reaching Indian levels of self-awareness.
apparently itās something about Chinese interference in American elections. Not related to Iran.
Rational and civilized countries should act less evil because if the values we humans have created for our societies fall apart, all of us will eventually suffer from its consequences in the long term.Do you think that being less evil will help, or hinder, Iran in its present war?
Reported for "petty bickering".Those are noble words indeed, but what is the answer to my simple question:
Do you think that being less evil will help, or hinder, Iran in its present war?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.