OldTwilight
Registered Member
As long as there any attack conduct from Kuwait to our land , we should hit them ...
Although we should consider ordinary civilian as well ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As long as there any attack conduct from Kuwait to our land , we should hit them ...
We learn as well ...
Zarif, Argachi, and Pezeskhian in shambles. But don’t worry they will try again in 1 week. Like persistent car salesmen.
seems like it's going to be a norm nowGood , our night time attacks become so predictable, they could react
seems like it's going to be a norm now
I don’t need to read between any lines. Either you’re with us or against us. Choose a sideThe problem with people like you is that you cannot read between the lines, you need a book to understand things which others can understand in 5 paragraphs. And then you vent your frustrations while blaming others for your own shortcomings.
My whole argument has been the attack on the 3 Civilian Ships transiting the strait which Iran hit and then everything went haywire. Before that, attacks had virtually stopped everywhere. There was relative peace and hope all around. And trump may be a conman, but he is also a simpleton who cannot control his emotions and feelings. Else, in which timeline would he ever have had cursed Nethanyahu??
It is your opinion that Trump wants total capitulation from Iran, had that been the case, Trump would have been striking all the power stations, power grids, water storages, oil storages and other critical civilian infrastructure which he has clearly not done on a large scale. He could just have ordered MOABs or even could literally have used Tactical or Conventional Nukes. I mean the attacks would have been relentless; Trump has so much destruction as his disposal that it is sometimes unbelievable that people still think Iran can actually defeat the US in a war. This is insanity.
And I said we could have expected the US to violate the MoU but not the Iranian side. And yet it turned out the Iranians were the ones who first shot down the US Helo and then targeted the 3 Civilian Vessels targeting the Strait.
I understand what you're saying. But ill defined periods of calm have no meaning in terms of actual raitified and verifiable diplomacy between nation states that were only just at war. There was no negotiation going on in this period and the rhetoric was openly hostile from both USA and Iran.After that, when Israel bombed Beirut, Iran fired missiles at Israel and the US fired some salvos at Iran or maybe it did not. But after all this, there was a period of calm for atleast a week or more. And that's what the world was building on to. By today, thing could have been so different, if only Iran had not attacked those vessels.
Don't try to pull the wool over my eyes. You have been conspiring and attacking international laws—as well as public and private figures—ever since the end of the Oslo Accords. You lied shamelessly about those infamous Iraqi "weapons of mass destruction," and you were overjoyed when the Libyan dictator fell, followed by the Syrian one. Don't feed me fairy tales; this war—like all the others—was started by your masters, and you are handsomely paid to justify Zionist messianism.It is warmongers like you on both sides because of which the situation is such today. Coming to me with crimes of the US and Israel as if I have justified any of their actions or defended any of their crimes against Humanity!!
Untrue. And Esbaçh told to you. If you host US troops that are attacking Irán territory you're legitimate target.violating rights of other countries which have nothing to do with the war
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.