Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Iran spent all that goodwill sending oil to China only for Xi to destroy Iranian leverage so the West could avoid an oil shock. China is the reason Trump doesn’t feel like he is under pressure to end the war. China’s actions wether intended or not have directly contributed to this war going on longer.

Is Xi willing to run his oil reserves down to save the West? Time will tell

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Same old shit by Iran - more drone attacks on Kuwait

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

This guy is single handedly ensuring to stretch US military to a point that it will no longer remain a threat for countries like China or Russia in the coming years. While Russia is still bogged down in Ukraine, China on the hand has a golden opportunity to take back Taiwan. Keep going Mr President, we support you!
 
Iran spent all that goodwill sending oil to China only for Xi to destroy Iranian leverage so the West could avoid an oil shock. China is the reason Trump doesn’t feel like he is under pressure to end the war. China’s actions wether intended or not have directly contributed to this war going on longer.

Is Xi willing to run his oil reserves down to save the West? Time will tell

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

They are way too sissy. The haven't fought a war for a long time, they no longer have the balls for it.
 
Their objective was regime change they killed many of the leaders but failed in achieving that, Israels objective is the fragmentation of Iran. Both are unlikely to give up, trumps constantly threatening the annihilation of Iran.
Neither Trump nor the US have appetitie for long wars. Trump will get out of it the day he gets something that he can sell to his public.
 
I don’t need to read between any lines. Either you’re with us or against us. Choose a side
The saddest thing here is you still need to ask. Basically, you still do not even know who your friends are just because they tell you how it is. I am not a warmonger, I want a stable, secure, strong Iran at my border which whom we have great commerce, trade and even defense agreements, free of international sanctions and limitations. And that’s why I want Iran to also act like it wants to be a stable country for Iranians instead of engaging in a war that it will eventually lose, if the other side really commits to it. All this keeps coming to the 3 tankers which Iran hit and which it could really have done letting go for long term benefit!!!
 
Untrue. And Esbaçh told to you. If you host US troops that are attacking Irán territory you're legitimate target.
This is yet another instance of appropriating an international law that Trump dismantled during his first term. Don't make me laugh; the United States and Israel treated the United Nations with utter contempt, yet now Hegseth and Rubio are invoking its rules and bodies to shield the U.S. and its proxies from the storm raining down on them in the region.
Pakistan trades through the Strait of Hormoz, when Iran threatens all ships transiting the Strait or imposes a blockade, it also invariably threatens Pakistani ships which effects our trade and commerce. We are a 3rd party; we have nothing to do with the war and hence my point of Iran doing things which are violation of the rights of countries which have nothing to do with the war.
 
What part of there is no international law. Its the law of the jungle if you can you do" do you not understand.
Again, at the cost of repitition, "so Pakistan will also be within its right to sink any Iranian vessel that passes within its range, correct? It's coming to might is right logic, yeah?"

wtf both sides?? Did Iran attack US??
Iran attacked unarmed Civilian Ships which were under the protection of the US Military and hence yes Iran initiated the latest round of hostilities by attacking those unarmed civilian vessels.
 
Shahbaz Sharif tweet on day one said cease fire was on all fronts and he specifically mentioned Lebanon.

Isreal never stopped attacking lebanon and so America defaulted on cease fire day one as it couldnt control or didnt want to control its proxy, Its only Iranian good will that gave US time to control its bastard proxy
I must have responded to this atleast multiple times!!

The ceasefire was violated in the initial days by Israel and then eventually Iran fired missiles at Israel which were responded but then all the sides literally stopped firing. There were reports of Israel attacking Palestine here and there but generally there was peace for a few days.

I will add this today -> that's when Iran decided that the peace was too much to bear. I guess all those chanting and sloganeering at the late supreme leader's funeral processions got to somebody’s head who thought Iran was stronger than the United States and could defeat the United States in a war…….and so it all began once more.
 
They are way too sissy. The haven't fought a war for a long time, they no longer have the balls for it.
The Chinese never had balls to begin with. They just don't have the killer DNA that others do and for a good portion of their history they have been bullied and pushed around by much smaller powers, which is pathetic if you think about it. They are in many ways similar to Indians except they aren't as parasitic.
 
Trump has not once but dozens times talked about sending Iran to middle ages, end of civilzation and what not.. How convinently you ignored all of them lol

US had attacked not once but twice during dialouges and killed Iranian leadship including children...

What a disgusting approach, May Allah curse the Child killers and the pathetic people who are siding with them. May their own suffer the same fate.
Nobody in the world takes Trump seriously, he will say something today and tomorrow he will say something 180 degree apart. And the next day he will say something entirely different.

Waise Iranian leaders have also said they will take revenge for the deaths in Iran but we all know that is not possible either. So both sides say things which are only for their public.

As for your curse, I agree.
 
The Chinese never had balls to begin with. They just don't have the killer DNA that others do and for most of their history they have been bullied and pushed around by much smaller powers. They are in many ways similar to Indians except they aren't as parasitic as them.
A very unfair view of the Chinese IMO. They have done very well in pushing back and defeating both Trump and Biden in the last 10 years. Their energy purchases of Iranian energy in defiance of the West is the only reason Iran is still afloat.
 
They are AA guns from WW2. I’m sure Iran can do without them if they get blown up.
From my limited understanding on the matter, in Pakistan and India, it was very quickly learned in the 2025 conflict that opsec was of fundamental importance when posting videos. Fixed assets, slow moving convoys, images confirming locations of troops were all vulnerabilities to be exploited by enemies. Those enemies may be visible or clandestine, operating from within. Both sides quickly realised the risks posed by social media and camera phones in the hands of unknowing civilians.

Another thing to remember about cheap air defences that has been learned from Ukraine and elsewhere is that cheap attack assets tend to preferentially be engaged by cheap defence assets because the objective of the cheap attack asset is not necessarily to overpower defenders but to illuminate them for a second tap. Defenders very deliberately use the AAA, flak etc wherever possible in order not to expose positions of the expensive stuff (in your case, Majid etc).
 
Again, at the cost of repitition, "so Pakistan will also be within its right to sink any Iranian vessel that passes within its range, correct? It's coming to might is right logic, yeah?"
Ever heard of geocentrism?
If you want to consider a worldview according to Pakistan and put it in Iranian shoes... then have Pakistan's top General Shareef killed unprovoked while visiting another country on a diplomatic mission. Then while negotiating a peace deal get it's Prime Minister killed simultaneously with COAS... and top leadership of the country...
Understand what rogue means!!!

Might makes right and if Iran doesn't pull it for itself... no one will pull for Iran...

In fact, it would be for the first time in generations this region will see freedom.

Iran attacked unarmed Civilian Ships which were under the protection of the US Military and hence yes Iran initiated the latest round of hostilities by attacking those unarmed civilian vessels.
Iran was baited civilian ships with turned off transponders to locate them, expose it's ISR for US targeting. There are two choices and both are wrong...

A non complying ship that could be a security threat or one that is actively undermining Iranian authority in times of war.

Put Pakistan there again... what you want Iran to do is, capitulate. And it is not complying with your world view.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top