Master Chief
Trusted Member
Agree with this!Than uae is the closest why not target it as well?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree with this!Than uae is the closest why not target it as well?
Actually this your post proves that Israel is most heavily involved in the war. I don't see in any stretch of imagination that any air refueler tankers or any AWACS could be stationed so near in Bahrain or Kuwait. But Iran keep hitting bahrain and kuwait but not hitting Israel when you already acknowledged in your post that there are so many US assets in Israeli airbases.
Even if we assume for a second that Israel isn't involved in this round then we should always remember that it was Israel who started this war and wanted Iran to completely collapse. (btw we know as a fact that Israel is involved even now with providing maximum logistics to US forces attacking Iran.)
This could be disinformation. I have read similar reports by the Israelis, that they don't attempt to intercept something they see is going to fall in open spaces, because they are low on interceptors. I first read reports like this in the 12 day war in 2025. Obviously the Israelis were lying and there was no actual shortage of interceptors."US military commanders are deliberately letting some Iranian missiles and drones through their air defenses to conserve dwindling interceptor stocks. "
That is one hell of a spin. Picture a state saying they are 'deliberately letting some rebels through their defenses to conserve dwindling weapons stocks.'
The constant chatter of shortages in ammunition seems to have a purpose (e.g. signalling to lower commodities price stress). Can't figure out if it's based on truth or deliberate disinfo.This could be disinformation. I have read similar reports by the Israelis, that they don't attempt to intercept something they see is going to fall in open spaces, because they are low on interceptors. I first read reports like this in the 12 day war in 2025. Obviously the Israelis were lying and there was no actual shortage of interceptors.
Did hitting Tel Aviv with a few random missiles actually result in any tactical or strategic victory against Israel the last time round? Such a repeated effort would - for now - be pissing in the wind. Certainly, if the radar shield is diminished to the point where strikes would be effective, then Iran should perhaps do this. But at present, Iran still needs to extract maximum benefit for itself from the minimum possible expenditure of assets. A very precarious position to be in.
I would have thought, as a third party observer, that this paradigm is obviously the reality. And i doubt any reasonable Iranian would dispute that. Even WITHOUT US direct support, inflicting a military defeat on Israel remotely (assumption would be that ground ops are not possible) is exceptionally difficult. Israel maintains air supremacy over its lands, so spec ops seem out of the question too. Iran's strategy options are limited.Either they have to accept that yes Iran has limited missiles / capability to take on Israel and Israel is not a walk in the park but a serious challenge
Than uae is the closest why not target it as well?
I think they want to give off false info w.r.t air defences to make sure iran falls for one of their ceasefire proposals because they want to portray that they are defenseless and the ceasefire proposal is genuine this time, just to ease the pressure on oil supply and go for another round in couple of weeksThe constant chatter of shortages in ammunition seems to have a purpose (e.g. signalling to lower commodities price stress). Can't figure out if it's based on truth or deliberate disinfo.
Qatar and UAE gave moniesThan uae is the closest why not target it as well?
They gave us sacks of cashThan uae is the closest why not target it as well?
Aragchi the Rat just issued a warning