Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Excuse me ?
A few missiles will finish the job in a matter of minutes.
Its sad to see these so called muslim countries not even lifting a finger when jews were massacring muslims in gaza but as soon as trump/natanyahu got trapped in their own war of choice, they form a bloody coalition to make sure the cancerous petrodollar and jewish hegemony survive in this region
 
Iranian media and leaders praised "al aqsa flood"
Because they're stupid. Does that surprise you? They're the same people that spent over a trillion dollars of Iran's wealth on a useless nuclear program that was mostly destroyed in less than 24 hours. October 7th was clearly a move against Iran in the region, launched by Hamas. Iran learned about the attack after it happened. That should tell you everything you need to know about it.

The US and Israel had been preparing for a war against Iran for decades and they needed an excuse to finally launch a regional war and destroy/weaken Iran's proxies one by one to get to Iran in the end. Hamas gave them that excuse to launch the war.

If the Iranian leaders weren't retarded, they would've completely abandoned, and even punished, Hamas after they fought against Hezbollah alongside HTS and other CIA-backed terorists during the Syrian Civil War.
 
I still think the Egypt drone attack was an ill-advised and rather pre-mature move, but this article points out it may have been an attempt to reality check all these efforts to by-pass SoH.

Egypt Suffers First Drone Attack, Widening the Iran War​

The strike, unclaimed by any country or group, serves as a warning the Suez Canal might not be a safe alternative for oil exports​



An explosion at a port on Egypt’s Mediterranean coast that set fire to two ships, including a U.S. gas-storage tanker, was caused by a drone attack, Egyptian authorities said Thursday, the first targeting of the country during the current Iran war and a new threat to a vital energy corridor.

The Egyptian cabinet said the fire at Damietta Port, which houses a key liquefied natural gas hub, had been brought under control with no casualties reported. It said that no party had claimed responsibility for the incident, which took place Wednesday.
Initially, Egyptian authorities blamed Iran for the attack and viewed it as an attempt to widen the conflict, Egyptian officials familiar with the matter said, signaling that Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has a higher risk appetite even with countries deemed friendly to Tehran.

The strike demonstrates the vulnerability of regional energy assets beyond the Persian Gulf and Red Sea theaters, raising the prospect that corridors seen as safe alternatives to the region’s chokepoints could themselves become targets. Since the outbreak of the Iran war, Saudi Arabia has shifted oil exports west to the Red Sea and north through the Suez Canal, while the United Arab Emirates and Iraq have accelerated pipeline routes designed to bypass the Strait of Hormuz.

Now the Damietta attack underscores a growing paradox: The more the region relies on bypasses to keep energy flowing, the more potential pressure points the conflict creates for an increasingly assertive Iran to exploit.

“This incident shows you how even supposedly safe alternative routes can now be threatened,” said Adi Imsirovic, a former energy-trading executive and lecturer at the University of Oxford. “It also sends a message that conflict isn’t limited to any particular region.”


The drone attack came shortly after the U.S. and Saudi forces launched strikes against Iran-aligned groups in eastern Iraq and Iran fired missiles at U.S. troops in Jordan.
President Trump told reporters in the Oval Office Wednesday that he had been briefed on the Egypt attack, implying Iran was responsible. “It is a little more of the same, but it is going to be straightening out,” he said. “We’re going to be hitting them very hard because it is our turn to hit them.”

Egypt has been a key regional mediator in the current conflict. In March, it opened a back channel to negotiate with Iran’s IRGC after Israel killed Iran’s national security chief, Ali Larijani, who had been considered a viable interlocutor with the West.

The drone hit the floating storage tanker Energos Winter, causing a ⁠fire that spread to another vessel, the Gaslog Salem LNG tanker, Egyptian officials familiar with the matter said.

According to ship-tracking firm Kpler, the incident disrupted operations at the LNG import hub. Both vessels have been moved offshore as authorities assess the situation.
Each move by regional oil producers to find a way around Iranian blockades or attacks provides redundancy, but it also turns terminals, pumping stations, storage sites and cross-border links into potential targets that adversaries can threaten.

Saudi Arabia has become the clearest test of that problem. Since the war began, the kingdom has pushed more crude through its East-West pipeline to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, allowing exports to avoid Hormuz. Threats and attacks by Iran-aligned Houthi rebels in Yemen soon made the southern Red Sea more dangerous, so tankers began turning north through the Red Sea toward Egypt, while the national oil company Saudi Aramco offered more crude from the Mediterranean port of Sidi Kerir. Flows through the Suez Canal and the parallel Sumed pipeline rose as traders searched for a new exit from overlapping chokepoints.

Now, the Damietta incident, which took place less than 40 miles from the northern exit of the Suez Canal, suggests that energy infrastructure on Egypt’s Mediterranean coast may no longer be safely outside the conflict’s reach.


Elsewhere, the U.A.E. is accelerating a second pipeline to Fujairah, a strategic port city outside the Strait of Hormuz, that would double its crude-export capacity, even though Fujairah itself has suffered drone attacks. Kuwait, which lacks an independent bypass, has discussed connecting its exports to networks in Saudi Arabia, while Iraq is pursuing alternatives including northern pipeline exports.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Iranian media and leaders praised "al aqsa flood"

I agree it was something against Iranian interests.

But Iran government itself doesn't share that opinion
They praised Al-Aqsa Flood because it was spectacular

Not because its in Iran's interests
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

These sauds cant even beat an impoverished yemen that has been under blockade for the past 12 years and they needed help from a dozen other jokers to make sure the saud family can enjoy the lavish lifestyles in western capitals.
 
Some have been cursing China's role in this war. Below article explains how China is actually practicing foreign policy, while the US has degenerated into simple bullying, bribing and blasting all over the globe.

China cuts deal with Houthis, adjusts for long US war with Iran​

China is cutting its own deals and gaining wartime leverage as the Trump administration scrambles to contain the war and reopen Hormuz.​

As the US-Israel-Iran war enters its sixth month, China is working behind the scenes to mitigate its economic costs and adjust for a prolonged conflict. The disruptions at the Bab el-Mandeb and Hormuz straits have sent shock waves through global oil markets. China, however, has maintained access to Middle Eastern crude through two distinct channels: Saudi oil has reached China on Chinese-linked tankers transiting waters blockaded by the Houthis, while Iranian crude has moved toward China through ship-to-ship transfers and oil stored aboard vessels off Malaysia.

The result is a resilient supply network for Beijing that has helped keep Chinese refineries supplied even as other operators reroute vessels and absorb higher insurance costs.

Chinese-linked tankers pass Bab el-Mandeb. Two supertankers, the Xin Long Yang and Cosnew Lake, exited the Red Sea through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait on July 23 carrying a combined 4 million barrels of Saudi crude, according to Reuters, citing LSEG shipping data. Both vessels reported the crews as Chinese through their automatic identification system signals, although only the Cosnew Lake was Chinese-flagged.

Reuters said the vessels had avoided a Houthi blockade targeting Saudi oil shipments. Two other China-bound vessels subsequently used the route. The Hong Kong-flagged New Explorer exited the Red Sea carrying Saudi and Emirati crude for Ningbo, while the New Pearl carried 2 million barrels of Saudi crude toward Zhoushan, according to shipping data from Kpler and LSEG.

On Tuesday, Reuters reported that China has held direct talks with the Houthis "to enable its tankers to sail through the southern Red Sea without being attacked after the Iran-aligned militia pledged to prevent access to Saudi ports."

➡️ The tactic is systematic, not accidental. The Houthis previously established an application system allowing selective ship passage through the strait, with crews emailing requests days in advance; Iran is trying to impose a similar formalized system on traffic through Hormuz.

As of Tuesday evening, multiple oil tankers traversing Bab el-Mandeb were broadcasting their links to China on their automatic identification system transmitters. That came shortly after news surfaced that China has been holding direct talks with the Houthis to enable its tankers to sail through the contested waters of the Red Sea without being attacked.

With China particularly, there is precedent. Bloomberg reported in 2024 that the Houthis told China and Russia their ships could sail through the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden without being attacked, following talks with top Houthi political figure Mohammed Abdel Salam.

Across the Arabian Peninsula, the resumption of a US blockade and the threat of Iranian attacks have impeded tanker transits at the Hormuz Strait. That hasn’t stopped China from importing Iranian oil by drawing on a floating reserve off Malaysia that has been available throughout the war — an established channel that circumvents US sanctions, according to Reuters, Kpler shipping data and The Wall Street Journal.

Tankers from Iran unload oil onto vessels off Malaysia that continue onward to China. One Iranian tanker, the Humanity, arrived off Malaysia last weekend, according to ship-tracking data reviewed by Reuters.


➡️ Even with the Iran war, China is still the top customer for Iranian oil while also buying from Saudi Arabia. Iranian oil arriving in China declined from a high of 1.7 million barrels a day in March to 785,000 in June and 523,000 in July after the war, per Kpler. Yet the share of Iranian crude in China’s total imports climbed to more than 24% in May and 18% in June, according to Vortexa.

Beijing is preparing for a long war. Reuters reported on Wednesday that Iran is expected to receive its first shipment of up to 400 Chinese-made shoulder-fired air defense missiles within weeks under a reported $60 million to $70 million deal. The purchase would help Tehran rebuild its short-range air defenses after months of war with the United States and Israel. China denied the report, and a spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry called it "groundless."

Joyce's take: China’s ability to work around choke points shows the benefits of Beijing’s longtime position as both a financial lifeline to Iran and a critical customer of its rivals — for example, Saudi Arabia.

China is cutting its own deals and gaining wartime leverage as the Trump administration scrambles to reopen Hormuz. Beijing is securing safe passage through Bab el-Mandeb, snagging Iranian oil off Malaysia and preserving access to cheap crude in a manner that strengthens its strategic advantage.

After cutting imports during the war and helping the global economy weather Hormuz disruptions, China’s demand trajectory is now the key variable traders and policymakers are watching. In the coming months, all eyes will be on whether Chinese oil demand rebounds — and how quickly. Either way, Beijing’s next moves are poised to ripple through global markets, even as it continues to stay a step ahead.

Al-Monitor's Sam Wendel contributed to this newsletter.
 
Because they're stupid. Does that surprise you? They're the same people that spent over a trillion dollars of Iran's wealth on a useless nuclear program that was mostly destroyed in less than 24 hours. October 7th was clearly a move against Iran in the region, launched by Hamas. Iran learned about the attack after it happened. That should tell you everything you need to know about it.

The US and Israel had been preparing for a war against Iran for decades and they needed an excuse to finally launch a regional war and destroy/weaken Iran's proxies one by one to get to Iran in the end. Hamas gave them that excuse to launch the war.

If the Iranian leaders weren't retarded, they would've completely abandoned, and even punished, Hamas after they fought against Hezbollah alongside HTS and other CIA-backed terorists during the Syrian Civil War.
yeah, first thing I thought oct 7 was: this will end in Israel attacking Iran.

Like 9/11 ended in USA attacking Iraq

Even when they were not the authors at all, but it was the needed excuse of USA/Israel aggressor to deploy war machine.

By the other side, I think a government can't say something against opinion of majority.

If all people are celebrating oct 7, it's hard for gov avoid the trending.

But yes, I think they should restraint more.

Anyway it would have changed nothing.

Israel would have taken advantage of oct 7 to attack Iran anyway, even with Iran government refusing oct 7.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
yeah, first thing I thought oct 7 was: this will end in Israel attacking Iran.

Like 9/11 ended in USA attacking Iraq

Even when they were not the authors at all, but it was the needed excuse of USA/Israel aggressor to deploy war machine.

By the other side, I think a government can't say something against opinion of majority.

If all people are celebrating oct 7, it's hard for gov avoid the trending.

But yes, I think they should restraint more.

Anyway it would have changed nothing.

Israel would have taken advantage of oct 7 to attack Iran anyway, even with Iran government refusing oct 7.
Nobody in Iran celebrated October 7th. Iranians are not very fond of Palestinians, no matter what others tell you :)

The Iranian regime is composed of a bunch of fools. You do not support a group that is linked to an ideology opposing yours and has only recently betrayed you. That's just like Politics 101. Many Palestinians consider the Shiite people to be Rafidhi. Not all of them, of course. There are secular and less radical Palestinians as well, but they do have a lot of that type of people among them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top