Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

muhammed45 said:
Undoubtedly, Iran's armed forces owe a special debt of gratitude to their Sunni brothers in Jordan—as previously acknowledged in earlier statements. We thank our Sunni brothers in Jordan for their intelligence assistance and for revealing the hideout of the American terrorists, and we regard this as an example of brotherhood among Muslims across Islamic nations.
Click to expand...
They are always avant-garde in that domain, they are first Arabic nation that not only made deal with zionists and pentagon, they made Jordan private land of Hashemitic dynasty...

They are proudly worse than Saudis for a full point, and that means something...
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Saudi Arabia used about 86% of its stockpiled 2,800 Patriot PAC-3 interceptors in the first 38 days of combat in the Iran War - Reuters/CSIS

After firing roughly 2,400 PAC-3s, the country was reportedly left with only 400 interceptors by April.

--

2,400 in 38 days ?!
Click to expand...

I dont get this, iran didnt even fire that many projectiles at ksa, maybe less that 100 in the entire war.

Were these saudi patriot missiles wasted to intercept missiles which were going to israel?
 
030292 said:
I dont get this, iran didnt even fire that many projectiles at ksa, maybe less that 100 in the entire war.

Were these saudi patriot missiles wasted to intercept missiles which were going to israel?
Click to expand...
Yeah, weird. Iran fired approx. 300 missiles and drones at KSA during the war.

Are they using 7-8 interceptors per target? Lol.
 
Persian Gulf said:
Yeah, weird. Iran fired approx. 300 missiles and drones at KSA during the war.

Are they using 7-8 interceptors per target? Lol.
Click to expand...

You are forgetting Saudi’s likely had to protect Bahrain as well. And many attacks against KSA INTIALLY likely went under reported to save face.
 
vizier said:
Possibly Saudi would prefer to make other two countries join against Yemen campaign at first step.

Pakistan refused to join the Saudi led 2015 Yemen campaign and officially does not recognise Houthis as terror group. Turkiye also does not recognise Houthis as a terror group. The situation did not change much but only a fragile ceasefire that is somewhat broken now and all issues unresolved.

So it would contradict Pakistans previous refusal to join Yemen campaign in 2015. Also all of a sudden recognising houthis as terrorists etc and would again be somewhat illogical for Turkiye and Pakistan as well. So the issue is complicated for Saudi-Yemen conflict and logically the countries wont be involved in this conflict for the sake of Saudis want it or for financial benefits I think/hope
Click to expand...
Pakistan and Turkey would join in a defense role against the Houthis. I dont see Turkey sending its navy to confront the houthis near the yemeni coast for example.
 
For the first time Saudi oil export to American mainland reached zero bpd.

The route that bypassed Persian Gulf in the red sea and enabled Saudi oil export to the US mainland was closed by Ansrallah.

Outcome: The importance of America's long-standing regional ally—the House of Saud—diminished significantly for the Americans.
 
Persian Gulf said:
Yeah, weird. Iran fired approx. 300 missiles and drones at KSA during the war.

Are they using 7-8 interceptors per target? Lol.
Click to expand...
They fired 20 interceptors against one missile once. I have to find the video but generally the gulf states unload dozens of interceptors against a single target.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


People don’t realize it’s easier to destroy a PIPELINE than it is to destroy a fleet of 100 tankers.

All Iran had to do is hit a few pumping stations with drones and missiles and suddenly 10MBPD of pressurized flow stops. That is a lot easier then having to hit 30 tankers everyday to keep a strait closed.
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Saudi Arabia used about 86% of its stockpiled 2,800 Patriot PAC-3 interceptors in the first 38 days of combat in the Iran War - Reuters/CSIS

After firing roughly 2,400 PAC-3s, the country was reportedly left with only 400 interceptors by April.

--

2,400 in 38 days ?!
Click to expand...


At 4 million each, that make's it $11 billion in missiles alone to defend the Americans on Saudi land, where were there to "defend them originally"..

The US refers to "its costs" to fight Iran, but maybe the total for what all of the US "allies" spent defending the Americans maybe should be factored in as well? In addition to the cost of the destroyed bases.
 
Immortals said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


People don’t realize it’s easier to destroy a PIPELINE than it is to destroy a fleet of 100 tankers.

All Iran had to do is hit a few pumping stations with drones and missiles and suddenly 10MBPD of pressurized flow stops. That is a lot easier then having to hit 30 tankers everyday to keep a strait closed.
Click to expand...

That can be repaired quickly as well. Meanwhile Replacing Tankers is not only difficult but also unsustainable.
 
030292 said:
I dont get this, iran didnt even fire that many projectiles at ksa, maybe less that 100 in the entire war.

Were these saudi patriot missiles wasted to intercept missiles which were going to israel?
Click to expand...
Only the payment part is belong to KSA , the usage right is in USA hand
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 2 more.
    • Total: 231 (members: 13, guests: 218)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top