ShapurII
Trusted Member
I agree, let's think logically about it.Think logically about the sequence of events.
Iran has not been harmed by Pakistan since that first pact was penned. To believe the second pact is designed to harm Iran is your own baseless ideation.
When Pakistan signed the initial pact, Iran and Saudi Arabia were not directly involved in war against each other, right? So, there was no reason for the initial pact to impact Iran in any reasonable way. But now that Iran and Saudi Arabia are involved in hostilities, what do you think a second pact implies?
Because they see this as an opportunity to destroy Iran while Iran is at its weakest fighting the US and Israel. And why do we assume that's true? Well, MBS has literally threatened Iran with destruction when he came to power in 2018, and even before that, a decade before him, the Saudis constantly pressured Obama to "cut the head of the snake". MBS literally created propaganda videos about attacking Iran and publicly said that they would bring war to Tehran.Tell us why on earth Pakistan, KSA, or Turkiye should bother getting involved in open conflict with Iran anyway when this war is clearly - and you and I both know it - winding down like a damp squib? Iran's efforts now appear to lie in extracting some sort of financial leverage over the SoH through negotiation because it is plainly self evident that militarily, we are at an impasse, a point of military stalemate between the belligerent parties.





