Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[lightning f57]

Ironic US is using shadow fleet tactics to get oil out.

 

[Flotilla]

One of reason, its strange but Iran can bring the Egypt and UAE in this treaty. Rest , if you research you will find the answer.

Even if finally Egypt and UAE doesn't join, the Entity will be closed like a canary in a cage.

But just wet dreams. It is a long way to... Mecca.

 

[HAIDER]

A big test expected today, when US announce new embargo... Pak and Turkey will be asked to fully close Iranian borders, for China, companies and banks will blacklisted who will deal with Iran.

 

[Desert]

... Pak and Turkey will be asked to fully close Iranian borders,

And if they don't?

 

[Watandar]

We hear so much boasting from GCC countries and yet they cannot even build a simple drone interceptor for themselves. The UAE is paying every tom dick and harry under the sun to build anti drone and missile interceptors.

Powerus to protect oil and gas infrastructure in the Middle East from UAS threats - Unmanned airspace

Autonomous Power Corporation (Powerus) has secured a contract valued at approximately USD 22.3 million to provide networked counter-uncrewed aircraft system (C-UAS) detection, tracking, classification and early-warning capabilities to help protect critical oil and gas infrastructure in the...

www.unmannedairspace.info

 

[Immortals]

One of reason, its strange but Iran can bring the Egypt and UAE in this treaty. Rest , if you research you will find the answer.

Maybe we can also bring Israel also into the alliance since you live in the land of Narnia and fantasy.

Arabs will never ally with the Persians. They would rather submit to Jewish and American rule before that day.

 

[Immortals]

 

[Immortals]

Rezai continues reiterating his redlines and threatening to enforce them (again). I don’t think Trump is listening or cares.

 

[Flotilla]

And if they don't?

Obviously he will do like with Putin

 

[Immortals]

 

[Immortals]

Marandi has made prior warnings in the past that never materialized so grain of salt on his predictions

 

[Immortals]

 

[Shags101]

Marandi has made prior warnings in the past that never materialized so grain of salt on his predictions

I’m thinking it is I’m thinking Iran has been quiet for a reason we might see something very soon

 

[Shags101]

Bombshell WSJ Report Reveals Iran’s ‘Secret Plan’ to Expand War With Trump: ‘Main War Has Not Yet Begun’ - AOL

The WSJ added that Iran may even go so far as to conduct ground incursions into nearby countries as part of its plan to escalate the war and prolong economic instability.

www.aol.ca

So I don’t have access to the main Wall Street journal article but I honestly believe Iran is about to something big will they keep meeting a larger amount of ships to enter maybe with naval escorts than strike as hard possible in multiple waves I’m thinking this could definitely be a possibility but Hezbollah Iran and Houthis now have gone extremely quiet and since they haven’t waved the white flag of surrender it’s extremely ominous

 

[FIsa]

!!!!Scott Bessent Just Dropped an OPED in Financial Times!!!

"Scott Bessent: an economic D-Day is coming for Iran"

LLM Summary Below:



The piece is essentially a declaration of maximum economic warfare against Iran, arguing that the US should now try to financially isolate Tehran completely, including punishing third countries that continue doing business with it.

The core argument is:

• The author says Trump has already weakened Iran militarily, damaged its nuclear programme and pushed its economy into severe distress. The next phase should be an “economic D-Day”: an unprecedented sanctions and enforcement campaign designed to sever virtually every remaining Iranian connection to the global economy.
• The real target is therefore not just Iran, but Iran’s remaining economic enablers — countries, banks, exchanges, shipping registries, airlines, free zones, oil traders and intermediaries that facilitate Iranian petroleum exports, payments or sanctions evasion.
• The warning to those countries is unusually explicit: choose Iran or choose access to the US-led financial system. Continuing to facilitate Iran could mean financial isolation, loss of investor confidence and being treated by Washington as a “global pariah”.
• Conversely, countries that cut Iran off are promised greater access to global capital, stronger market credibility and closer integration with the international financial system.
• The author argues previous US administrations mistakenly tried to manage Iranian aggression indefinitely. Trump, by contrast, supposedly intends to eliminate the threat rather than contain it.
• Importantly, the piece presents financial strangulation as an alternative to a larger American war: completely isolating Iran economically could theoretically force the regime into capitulation or destabilise it without requiring extensive US military action.
• But it couples the economic threat with an explicit military deterrent: if a weakened Iran attacks US forces or Gulf neighbours, Trump will respond “swiftly and decisively”.

What is really significant​

The most consequential passage is not the rhetoric about Iran itself. It is the threat of secondary sanctions on an unprecedented scale:

Any country or entity maintaining meaningful economic links with Tehran could itself become a target.

That implies the strategy could move beyond conventional sanctions against designated Iranian companies toward aggressively targeting the entire ecosystem enabling Iranian trade — potentially including Chinese oil buyers, regional banks, UAE or other Gulf trading intermediaries, shipping companies, flag registries and financial centres.

So the article is effectively signalling:

“Iran is going to be subjected to near-total financial quarantine, and neutrality will no longer be tolerated.”

The Tehran/D-Day/Pascal references are mostly rhetorical packaging for a very straightforward doctrine: Washington believes Iran is vulnerable enough that crushing its remaining external economic lifelines could become decisive, and it is prepared to impose large costs on countries that refuse to participate.

If implemented literally, the biggest question becomes how aggressively the US is willing to sanction major countries such as China and important Gulf financial/trading hubs, because that determines whether this is genuinely different from previous “maximum pressure” campaigns.

​