Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[Beast89]

Iran had momentum last week, again failed to capitalise on it.

 

[Flotilla]

Iran had momentum last week, again failed to capitalise on it.

Are you sure;

Check americans panicking;

 

[KAL-EL]

Iran had momentum last week, again failed to capitalise on it.

Truth be told, Iran would have had momentum when the Israelis and U.S. first started bombing the hell out of them.
.
And what I mean is they should have struck back hard. Just a few missiles towards tel Aviv. Isn't striking back hard

 

[Immortals]

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Truth be told, Iran would have had momentum when the Israelis and U.S. first started bombing the hell out of them.
.
And what I mean is they should have struck back hard. Just a few missiles towards tel Aviv. Isn't striking back hard

thats suicidal

they would n**e IR, without second thought!

IR, it seems, is on the right path to 'cold boil' the enemy economically first, so, when the final fight starts, in return for a nuc***r strike, IR can hurt them economically more!

I mean, staying in the fight, opens up more options!


cold boil is behavior in thermodynamics, where cold ice boils water and not fire!

 

[KAL-EL]

thats suicidal

they would n**e IR, without second thought!

IR, it seems, is on the right path to 'cold boil' the enemy economically first, so, when the final fight starts, in return for a nuc***r strike, IR can hurt them economically more!

I mean, staying in the fight, opens up more options!


cold boil is behavior in thermodynamics, where cold ice boils water and not fire!

Suicidal or not. I'm trying to look at it from Iran's point of view. Two extremely powerful adversaries bombing the living hell out of me destroying infrastructure and killing many of my leaders and scientists

Could possibly be an existential threat. In that mindset, Iran has the right to do anything in its disposal to defend itself

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Suicidal or not. I'm trying to look at it from Iran's point of view. Two extremely powerful adversaries bombing the living hell out of me destroying infrastructure

Could possibly be an existential threat. In that mindset, around has the right to do anything in its disposal to defend itself

have you ever visited IR or met an Irani?

sorry, you are right, but your scope is very limited

 

[KAL-EL]

have you ever visited IR or met an Irani?

sorry, you are right, but your scope is very limited

Yes, I have met several Iranians here in the states. They're very proud people and even though they might not like some of what their government has been doing

They don't particularly like outsiders bombing the living hell out of their country and killing their leaders and scientists

 

[Immortals]

US Strategic Petroleum Reserves are at their lowest levels since 1982.

Erosion of US Strategic Petroleum Reserves will incease oil prices even further and this will have negative effects on US economy.

The SPR draw is less than 700K/barrels a week at this point. It is not the reason oil markets are stabilized. China oil imports are still 4MBPD less than pre war as China tries to save the West.

So your thesis is wrong at this point.

It is all false US propaganda that oil continues to flow from the Strait.

You sir are delusional. If there wasn’t 10MBPD (or more) of oil currently flowing out of the Persian Gulf region then oil would be much higher than $100 because you would be talking about a DAILY SHORTFALL of 10-15MBPD.

Think about that for a moment. The pre war flow was 19MBPD.

Otherwise how to explain the fact that oil prices continue to grow despite US, EU, Japan and China releasing oil from their Strategic Petroleum Reserves.

Can you prove that EU and Japan are still releasing meaningful quantities?

Oil supplies from the Persian Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz will never be the same again...

“Americans have the watches; Iran has the time”

You live in fantasy land, there is literally satellite photos showing VLCCs transiting IN DAYTIME. So clearly Iran doesn’t know the time.




Gulf of Oman’s there are dozens of STS transfers happening




But sure, the Strait of Hormuz is “closed”.

 

[PakFactor]

Truth be told, Iran would have had momentum when the Israelis and U.S. first started bombing the hell out of them.
.
And what I mean is they should have struck back hard. Just a few missiles towards tel Aviv. Isn't striking back hard

Kinda hard to do when you have the midget king of Jordan providing support to Israel & Co., in intercepting rockets and drones headed to Israel.

So, the next best option that Iran had was to hit U.S. assets in the regional Arab countries and where they are housing U.S. forces.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Yes, I have met several Iranians here in the states. They're very proud people and even though they might not like some of what their government has been doing

They don't particularly like outsiders bombing the living hell out of their country and killing their leaders and scientists

they can raise buildings at a fast pace, even under sanctions!

 

[KAL-EL]

Kinda hard to do when you have the midget king of Jordan providing support to Israel & Co., in intercepting rockets and drones headed to Israel.

So, the next best option that Iran had was to hit U.S. assets in the regional Arab countries and where they are housing U.S. forces.

For example, if Iran shot 100 ballistic missiles at Israel, no way in hell. Does any defense stop a lot of them

A lot of those ballistic mixals would cause a lot of damage to tel Aviv

Thus, thus raising the deterrence level

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Kinda hard to do when you have the midget king of Jordan providing support to Israel & Co., in intercepting rockets and drones headed to Israel.

So, the next best option that Iran had was to hit U.S. assets in the regional Arab countries and where they are housing U.S. forces.

attacking zios first, would have exhausted resources

OTOH, attacking bases in Arabs, had a financial motive.


that way, zios can leave the conflict and USA would come out in open support!

so, if USA is kept at bay, Zios would come out again to support Arabs!

thats how it plays, and, all time, economic suffocation goes on!

 

[UKBengali]

Truth be told, Iran would have had momentum when the Israelis and U.S. first started bombing the hell out of them.
.
And what I mean is they should have struck back hard. Just a few missiles towards tel Aviv. Isn't striking back hard

No idea why Iran did not carry on bombing the Zionists and simply offered a ceasefire with US. In the last two weeks 20%+ of Iranian missiles were getting through and interceptors stocks were at such low levels that even with then firing rate of 20-25 missiles a day, it would have taken maybe 3-4 days to totally exhaust any useful interceptors left(Arrow 3/SM-3 and THAAD).

It had plenty of missiles and Zio-US was desperate and now Zionists are sitting pretty in Palestine and seeing whether US can strangle Iran.

This is an existential war and Iran is acting like there is a "bargain" to be had with two adversaries that will lie and cheat when it suits them.

 

[PakFactor]

For example, if Iran shot 100 ballistic missiles at Israel, no way in hell. Does any defense stop a lot of them

A lot of those ballistic mixals would cause a lot of damage to tel Aviv

Thus, thus raising the deterrence level

The Israel and American's have a solid defense network from land, air and sea, and they've been able to successful defend Tel Aviv.

The other issue is Iran can't replenish it's BMs and drones as fast as the Israeli coalition are able to replenish bombs.

I'm sure the Iranian regime looked all options and the current fighting strategy is more optimal.