Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[BananaRepublic]

This paradigm, while entirely valid, only functions within the context that interception equipment is actually being targeted.

How is deploying khat chewers to hit Riyadh Airport part of that calculus?

Riyadh airport is being used by Zio-US for military purposes.

And why should Iran only hit military installations when Arabs are facilitating the attacks on schools and hospitals?!!!

Sounds very entitled, bro!

 

[Master Chief]

Riyadh airport is being used by Zio-US for military purposes.

And why should Iran only hit military installations when Arabs are facilitating the attacks on schools and hospitals?!!!

Sounds very entitled, bro!

Hajj pilgrims were hit. And I am not stating Iran directly hit anyone. On the contrary, their proxy is out of control and targeting civilians willy nilly. You will recall Iran's actions against numerous Arab states earlier in the year, when they too could easily have hit a number of civilian targets but they actually very reasonably targeted military airbases and radar installations, with varying degrees of success.

It is a different equation entirely if some reckless entity chooses to attack civilians at an airport. You tell me what distinguishes such an entity from the Tel Aviv regime that they repeatedly claim to be the world's no.1 adversary of? It remains noteworthy in this context that - as we have been told - the Houthis have a non-aggression pact with the Americans, which the Houthis will not dare break themselves. You will most probably see Trump break this agreement soon enough though.

Nobody's hands are quite as clean and magnanimous as they themselves make them appear in front of the cameras. What goes on in the background is far messier than any of us would care to acknowledge.

 

[Flotilla]

The rest of your post is mere rant, Israelis obliterated your launchers and your air defense and had a field day over your skies, took out your whole leadership, including the supreme leader, and you are shamelessly beating your chest here like it's some sort of medal.

So basically they won the war, right?

They have no Navy, no Air Force, no Air Defenses and no missiles, right?.

Please change your name to IceBrain.

 

[mangekyo]

 

[Ali_Baba]

Latest katz remarks and this plan is connected. When isreal attacks Iran energy infra like pushing a button they will aim to make Iran react by attacking saudi-uae energy-oil sites . In that case which is when only isreal is involved Iran should focus only on isreal, jordan(more focused and extensive bombing without ceasefire until jordan regime changes their stance that no defense will be done to protect isreal by their own assets or usa assets like thaad) and maybe kuwait opening their airspace for attacks. Taking jordan out of the equation is more important against isreal than attacking energy infra of other countries as retaliation.

If Iran reacts to isreali energy infra attack by attacking saudi - uae- qatar energy infra then the psy ops will start to create a larger scale shia-sunni conflict. Iran is working with isreal against sunnis type of psy operatives will bombard the masses. Only if usa gets directly involved in the next strike then uae-saudi-qatar is directly accountable. israel doing this without usa hardware support is also difficult this should be observed as well.

It is like pushing buttons. They create events to create a reaction they want in others to shape the politics-psychology of the masses according to their agenda. Resisting those reactions and thinking before taking action is key.

The goals of Iran and Israel are both the same, that is the political and economic destruction of the middle east. In the case of Iran, it is to establish more proxy groups to undermine Governments and establish Shia/Iranian control and for Israel it is Greater Israel.

As you say, taking out the military capability that forms a shield for Israel should be the focus, not airports in Saudi etc.

 

[Master Chief]

Perhaps you are too young to remember the first leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

What exactly do you think the crusader-zionist axis had in mind when they groomed a certain Ayatollah to take over from the senior Shah (with whom Pakistan had a perfectly strong and healthy relationship btw, and India were hardly even lukewarm with - a point not to be overlooked if we are to indulge in a deeper analysis of this century old great game)?

Now it can certainly be argued that Islamic fundamentalism had a role against Soviet influence in the Middle East and Iran but it is not without basis that the same proponents of this strategy also felt a sunni-shia schism would further enable Israel's supremacy in the region.

The only question to ask therefore, in this context, is whether the actions of certain parties are further enabling this plot or not. A sunni bloc should never be seen as a threat to Iran. Clearly, not one of these sunni nations has fired a single shot in anger at Iran. I'm not at all sure though that asking the Sanaa horde to go out and do a number on your behalf is helping anyone other than your supposed enemy no. 1.

 

[Professor Jiang]

The goals of Iran and Israel are the same, that is political and economic destruction of the middle east. In the case of Iran, it is to establish more proxy groups to undermine Governments and establish Shia/Iranian control and for Israel it is Greater Israel.

How does this explain Bahrain or other Gulf countries, where the main Shia opposition groups have been actively ignored by Iran and instead look to scholars that are either under house arrest in Iran or have been outwardly hostile to Ali Khamenei?

 

[Professor Jiang]

Clearly, not one of these sunni nations has fired a single shot in anger at Iran. I'm not at all sure though that asking the Sanaa horde to go out and do a number on your behalf is helping anyone other than your supposed enemy no. 1.

Everything we've seen and heard so far indicates that Yemen (or "Sanaa hordes", as you describe them) has done exactly what it has wanted to do despite Iran attempting to broker some kind of settlement between them and the Saudis. This is not the behaviour of a proxy, but of a sovereign government with its own interests, and one that is seemingly immune to Iran's strategic patience nonsense.

 

[vizier]

The goals of Iran and Israel are the same, that is political and economic destruction of the middle east. In the case of Iran, it is to establish more proxy groups to undermine Governments and establish Shia/Iranian control and for Israel it is Greater Israel.

As you say, taking out the military capability that forms a shield for Israel should be the focus, not airports in Saudi etc.

I dont think they opt for influence but rather survival. If Pmu didnt exist in Iraq there would be secterian extermination after isis takeover of Iraq. That possibility still exists today.

In Labennon Hezbollah has power but does not make a coup or confront the government rather gets along with it in a troublesome way while fighting for survival against israel. In Yemen there was civil war which saudi is responsible for many civilian deaths. We cant unsee civilan deaths in Yemen including the famine resulted from the blockade when the responsible is sunni and has huge money.

Houthis also made warning to evacuate the airports prior to the attack. Saudi govt is partly responsible of not taking measures protecting their citizens. The interceptors-sirens also didnt work at the airport attack. why? Was there a human error or deliberate lack of responsibility from the saudi side and was it investigated?

2 operations could yield more support for the saudi side if public is convinced that it is true. One is if Houthis attack closer to the holy sites and the other is umrah pilgrims getting killed. Even warning the targets priorly and their airports attacked priorly by saudis, Houthis were careless to do this kind of attack.

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

View attachment 219826

Bibi has something on him. No other explanation for this nonsense.