Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Zio-US would have had a choice:

1. Waste all remaining intereceptors to try to stop this salvo.

2. Take crippling damage.

Either way Iran wins.
waste 2 thaad missiles each 14million dollars on a 30k shahed lol

I wonder if a shahed drone can even do 28million dollars worth of damage but it can definitely knock out israeli energy grid and critical infrastructure in enough numbers

big ballistics are the ones that take down sky scrapers if you hit them at the right spot so the floors fall on top of one another in a domino effect
 
waste 2 thaad missiles each 14million dollars on a 30k shahed lol

I wonder if a shahed drone can even do 28million dollars worth of damage but it can definitely knock out israeli energy grid and critical infrastructure in enough numbers

big ballistics are the ones that take down sky scrapers if you hit them at the right spot so the floors fall on top of one another in a domino effect


Zio-US won't waste Arrow-3/THAAD-SM-3 on Shaheed and so only a large scale ballistic missile would force them to use them or take crippling damage.

Iran now has optically guided Qasseem Bassir that can hit with pinpoint accuracy.

Fire off some older missiles first to waste interceptors and then let the modern ones do the real damage.
 


...(continue)...
Iran offered to mediate between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis. It was represented by President Pezeshkian, SNSC chief Mohsen Rezaei and senior IRGC officials. Turkish intelligence chief Ibrahim Kalin and Pakistan's army chief Asim Munir were also taking part.

This is one of the biggest concessions from the Saudis yet.

$1bn from Saudis is not a big concession because it doesn't cost them much to give Ansarallah,since they have many billions (and unfortunately for Saudis, Iranias and Yemenis are some of the last people to see or hear of such large sums and forget their values ,goals or common sense)on hand.
In the first place. It's even little if it's a trick/bait/bribe to buy some time or lure Ansarallah into a militarily disadvantageous position in its war against KSA. US and Ukraine are some of the sneakiest negotiator nations out there and KSA is working with both of them, go figure.

Saudis must lift the blockade or risk losjng territory and global influence and business that'll take years to recover.
 
Last edited:
$1bn from Saudis is not a big concession because they doesn't cost them much to give Ansarallah,since they havesny billions (and unfortunately for Saudis, Iranias and Yemenis are some of the last people to see or hear of such large sums and forget their values ,goals or common sense).
In the first place. It's even little if it's a trick/bait/bribe to buy some time or lure Ansarallah into a militarily disadvantageous position in its war against KSA. US and Ukraine are some of the sneakiest negotiator nations out there and KSA is working with both of them, go figure.

Saudis must lift the blockade or risk losjng territory and global influence and business that'll take years to recover.
Take the money, tell saudis to chill and then attack them harder then ever lol

a play out of trumps book
 
Yeah launch 300 shaheds to waste the interceptors and let those big ballistic missiles to wreak havoc
All dem muzz-Limmz are keenly watching Iran retaxis, fully aware their own gubments suck dick daily for survival no?.......theys dhunn't know what to make of dis drama no? Cuzz theys poor tribal people, perpetually colonized no? Its a sad situ bruh........

Iran needs to be cognizant of this fact and not rock da boat too much or else these guys will quit supporting Iran.

Eeeeezy does it..........Eeeeeeezzy now.

Eeeejy Peeejy like Hendu lady taking a shit in her backyard, despite having a toilet in her home.
 
All dem muzz-Limmz are keenly watching Iran retaxis, fully aware their own gubments suck dick daily for survival no?.......theys dhunn't know what to make of dis drama no? Cuzz theys poor tribal people, perpetually colonized no? Its a sad situ bruh........

Iran needs to be cognizant of this fact and not rock da boat too much or else these guys will quit supporting Iran.

Eeeeezy does it..........Eeeeeeezzy now.
Iran is just waiting for a big attack and already have its response ready.

Without sending ground troops any attack US does is ultimately meaningless

Trump just wants to do some more bragging infront of the camera and say how he won again and again
 
Iran is just waiting for a big attack and already have its response ready.

Without sending ground troops any attack US does is ultimately meaningless

Trump just wants to do some more bragging infront of the camera and say how he won again and again
I's said it years ago, attacking Iran is just idiocy.

Only way to destroy Iran is to invade it.......then yeah, Iran will fall.

And the only way to accomplish that, today, is to ask all them surrounding failed states to invade Iran.

Thats it.

Asking these surrounding failed states to invade Iran is a tall order bruh.
 
Iranian intelligence haven't quite been successful in preventing assassinations on their leaders so there is a question mark.
Iranians do not want to admit but that was a colossal fuk up intelligence failure. Remember the first attack by Israel came from within Iran that knocked out Iranian air defenses.
 
$1bn from Saudis is not a big concession because it doesn't cost them much to give Ansarallah,since they have many billions (and unfortunately for Saudis, Iranias and Yemenis are some of the last people to see or hear of such large sums and forget their values ,goals or common sense)on hand.
In the first place. It's even little if it's a trick/bait/bribe to buy some time or lure Ansarallah into a militarily disadvantageous position in its war against KSA. US and Ukraine are some of the sneakiest negotiator nations out there and KSA is working with both of them, go figure.

Saudis must lift the blockade or risk losjng territory and global influence and business that'll take years to recover.
shared companies in each other soil is what avoid future wars, not just money.

ksa should invest in houthi civilian economy.
 
zioelections today

israelis can choose among warmongers or very warmongers

👍😂

Netanyahu is 200 x more dangerous than Eisenknot, who's just a natural apparatsjik, a regular bureaucrat with experience in the army but without the leverage and smalltalk of the sewerjew Bibi.

Netanyahu has the patriottic symbolism (his brother died during Operation Entebbe), he has propaganda power (since the 80's he is talking in English before commissions about Iran, Iraq, Turkey etc), he has the lines with AIPAC inside the US, he has the connections with the High Rabbe and he is highly involved in the Epstein blackmail infrastructure hence why all the Gulfstate leaders are bowing for him.

Eisneknot must win with all means.
 
shared companies in each other soil is what avoid future wars, not just money.

ksa should invest in houthi civilian economy.
There is no ROI for the GCC to invest in businesses in muzz-Lim countries. Only ROI worthwhile is funding deobandi/ wahabbi madarsay/ jihadi tanzeem etc.

They invest hundreds of billions in countries like India where they can get some of the hard currency earnings back by selling oil n gas/ petchems etc.

Rest of the maany stays in BOA in NY and that is used by US corporations on construction/ infra/ weapons/ servicing/ support contracts.

GCC is under western financial management, in case you didn't know.
 


They will abandon the GCC states eventually and it really doesn't matter if Iran is 'defeated' or not. I just wonder how these artificial Kingdoms will treat Iran once the reality kicks in.

Find just two differences between a Russian or North Korea dictatorship and Middle East ones...
One is related to the color of their skin and the other related to fission devices...
 
This basically shows that our guess about war starting last weekend was actually right. The reason it didn't happen was because Iran decided to hold back and not respond to the Israeli attack instead of fighting back.

I've mixed feelings about this. It is true, Netanyahu didn't end up getting what he wanted, but Iran's current deterrent capability is essentially absent now. It appears Tehran will remain inactive unless the Israelis surpass a specific threshold of actions, which effectively means the Iranian leadership is permitting all sabotage, operations, and attacks that stay below this critical line.
No.
Irán did It well.
Netanyahu wanted to rid off the elections by accusing Irán of attacking first (basically Irán cannot make surgical attacks because they don't have such fighters and precisión small long range munitions like ice breaker).

If Irán would respond the only real answer would be big and politically contundent ballistic missiles and Irán would be used as an excuse for keeping Netanyahu in power.

Immortal pointed that Israeli command staff disagreed with Netanyahu just 48 hours ago.

Even Trump avoid carefully to join Netanyahu's iniciative.

So instead of being surprised or conclude a Iranian weakness in my oppinion, the Iranian self restrain should be interpreted like a form to avoid falling in the Netanyahu 's trap.

IMO It should be interpreted also like a weakness of Netanyahu. Nobody followed him and even military high rank was reluctant.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top