Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[BigMela2onin]

People are too emotional to see it today because they have personal reverance for khamenei. Thats why i said history will judge him poorly.

Because once you remove emotion, and look at his policy decisions in an objective manner, there is nothing but to conclude he was one of the worse leaders in modern Iranian history.

He is one of the worst leaders in not just Iranian history, but human history. Akin to Nero who watched Rome burn, he could not be bothered to do anything but sit and read as bombs rained down on his own head.

 

[Abdul q]

Why is there no noise!

 

[Ravenman]

Worldwide outage with Microsoft Outlook and Teams in more than 74 countries.

Preparing the world for a nuclear bomb and EMP. Iran is a target.

The date is 17 november (exactly 666 days afters Trumps inauguration).

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

BREAKING: Israel says the U.S. is secretly preparing for a renewed war with Iran, with Israel’s UN Ambassador Danny Danon revealing that Washington is moving large numbers of troops into the region and placing its embassies on high alert, per i24NEWS.

“We’re seeing extensive preparations by the US: it is moving large numbers of troops into the region and putting its embassies on high alert,” Danon said.

The U.S. reportedly has around 200 refueling aircraft deployed and is preparing to bring a third aircraft carrier into the region, alongside two already operating there.

Comes as Trump has completely ruled out negotiations with Iran saying “We don’t need a deal with Iran. Those days have long since passed.”

 

[hasn2009]

BREAKING: Israel says the U.S. is secretly preparing for a renewed war with Iran, with Israel’s UN Ambassador Danny Danon revealing that Washington is moving large numbers of troops into the region and placing its embassies on high alert, per i24NEWS.

“We’re seeing extensive preparations by the US: it is moving large numbers of troops into the region and putting its embassies on high alert,” Danon said.

The U.S. reportedly has around 200 refueling aircraft deployed and is preparing to bring a third aircraft carrier into the region, alongside two already operating there.

Comes as Trump has completely ruled out negotiations with Iran saying “We don’t need a deal with Iran. Those days have long since passed.”

Gotta give it to Israel on the truthfulness of their media, they just don't hide, I mean, the western media will do everything to hide Gaza/Iran genocide and white wash Israeli crimes, but, Israeli media will openly say we will kill all Palestinians, destroy Iran, kill all muslims, and USA is our slave.

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

Trump says they don’t need a deal with Iran

View attachment 222684

Iran’s botched handling of this war will be studied for decades as prime example of incompetent statecraft by China, Russia, and North Korea and other countries.

This evil warlord and Trump's handler on behalf of Likudniks gave Trump his final orders. She made it clear to him yesterday that he (Trump) has his remaining two years to bring a change in Iran.

As the puppet who heard from his puppeteer, Trump humiliated his VP and is implementing Miriam Andelson's orders.

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

Trump’s statements that America does not need to reach an agreement with Iran mean that the military option has reached a dead end and has not achieved its objectives.

And that is exactly what I said today: the third option is to keep Iran under siege, and this option does not serve any country in the region. It serves America at the expense of its neighbors.

Disrupting oil and gas exports and halting trade in our region means opening the door for America to take over energy and trade markets, while the Gulf states and the rest of the region bear the losses and pay the price.

In short: what serves the American economy does not necessarily serve our interests, and the countries of the region need to pay attention to this.

Keeping Iran under siege means keeping the Strait of Hormuz closed, continuing to disrupt maritime navigation, targeting ships, and paralyzing trade and energy flows in the region.

The countries of the region must realize that allowing this situation to continue is not in their interest, and that they must take a clear and firm stance and use every means to pressure for an end to the siege of Iran.

Iran cannot be asked to open the Strait of Hormuz while it remains under siege and pressure. Anyone who wants to open the strait and restore the security of navigation must first work to lift the siege and end the causes of the confrontation.

The equation is clear: continuing the siege means the crisis continues, and lifting the siege is the necessary path to opening the door to a solution. The countries of the region must not allow their interests, security, and economies to become bargaining chips in a conflict that serves others’ interests.

And some people still do not get the picture, no matter how much you explain it to them! They come out and say: we support Iran, and we want the siege lifted!

Folks, stop talking nonsense and understand what is happening. The siege of Iran is not limited to Iran. In practice, it means choking the region’s ports and disrupting its trade and the flow of oil, gas, and goods through the Strait of Hormuz.

And what you need to understand clearly: as long as the siege continues, do not expect the Strait of Hormuz to open, and do not expect shipping to return to normal. Threats, attacks on ships, and economic losses will continue, and the countries of the region are the ones that will pay the price.

We are not defending Iran or its regime. We are defending our security, our economy, and our countries’ interests. Do not mix things up!

Someone calling for the siege to be lifted is not necessarily supporting Iran, but they understand that continuing the siege means continuing to choke the region along with Iran. And for anyone who still cannot grasp this equation, the problem is not with the explanation. The problem is with understanding reality.

 

[OldTwilight]

Trump’s statements that America does not need to reach an agreement with Iran mean that the military option has reached a dead end and has not achieved its objectives.

And that is exactly what I said today: the third option is to keep Iran under siege, and this option does not serve any country in the region. It serves America at the expense of its neighbors.

Disrupting oil and gas exports and halting trade in our region means opening the door for America to take over energy and trade markets, while the Gulf states and the rest of the region bear the losses and pay the price.

In short: what serves the American economy does not necessarily serve our interests, and the countries of the region need to pay attention to this.

Keeping Iran under siege means keeping the Strait of Hormuz closed, continuing to disrupt maritime navigation, targeting ships, and paralyzing trade and energy flows in the region.

The countries of the region must realize that allowing this situation to continue is not in their interest, and that they must take a clear and firm stance and use every means to pressure for an end to the siege of Iran.

Iran cannot be asked to open the Strait of Hormuz while it remains under siege and pressure. Anyone who wants to open the strait and restore the security of navigation must first work to lift the siege and end the causes of the confrontation.

The equation is clear: continuing the siege means the crisis continues, and lifting the siege is the necessary path to opening the door to a solution. The countries of the region must not allow their interests, security, and economies to become bargaining chips in a conflict that serves others’ interests.

And some people still do not get the picture, no matter how much you explain it to them! They come out and say: we support Iran, and we want the siege lifted!

Folks, stop talking nonsense and understand what is happening. The siege of Iran is not limited to Iran. In practice, it means choking the region’s ports and disrupting its trade and the flow of oil, gas, and goods through the Strait of Hormuz.

And what you need to understand clearly: as long as the siege continues, do not expect the Strait of Hormuz to open, and do not expect shipping to return to normal. Threats, attacks on ships, and economic losses will continue, and the countries of the region are the ones that will pay the price.

We are not defending Iran or its regime. We are defending our security, our economy, and our countries’ interests. Do not mix things up!

Someone calling for the siege to be lifted is not necessarily supporting Iran, but they understand that continuing the siege means continuing to choke the region along with Iran. And for anyone who still cannot grasp this equation, the problem is not with the explanation. The problem is with understanding reality.

This good llti6if Iran goes back to steratic patient policies which due the pressure from within is not sustainable for IR ....
The moment Iran unveiling it's nukes our neighbors will have too choose between nuclear Iran with more than 6000 years history or 200 years old USA and the answer would be clear for logical individual ( if USA could not defeat non nuclear Iran , it won't have any chance against nuclear Iran)


Mean while we are investing on new anti ship ballistic and cruise missiles which will end the west 500 years hegemony on the sea