Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Jt was that Or no deal and every body in Iran accepted it .
Only two group were against it . Israel and their agents inside iran
You're a fool if you think Israel was against the JCPOA. lol
Real Israeli agents are the people that stopped Iran's ICBM and nuclear programs. That includes Khamenei as well. He's proven to be more loyal to Putin than Iran and Russia is best buddies with Zionists.
 
That doesn't make him any less of a treasonous c*nt that he is.
We are in this situation now because of the JCPOA and the snapback mechanism that Zarif negotiated and signed with the approval of Khamenei.

JCPOA set Iran's nuclear program back by 10 years without a single bullet and nearly zero gains for Iran. Again, I blame Khamenei more than I blame Zarif.

Zarif is a role model as much as Yazdgerd III or Naser-eddin Shah was a role.
Iran nuclear program was neverset back 10 year since 13 year before jcpoa no nuke program existed in Iran.
And jcpoa didn't limit research and development.
 
You're a fool if you think Israel was against the JCPOA. lol
Real Israeli agents are the people that stopped Iran's ICBM and nuclear programs. That includes Khamenei as well. He's proven to be more loyal to Putin than Iran and Russia is best buddies with Zionists.
Iran ICBM program stopped by Mr. Khamenei .
Iran Nuke program stopped by Mr. Khomeini and Mr. Khamenei .

If you really believe in what you said they I have doubt about your real purpose.
 
Iran nuclear program was neverset back 10 year since 13 year before jcpoa no nuke program existed in Iran.
And jcpoa didn't limit research and development.
You're clearly misinformed, or you are lying through your teeth.
Iran's nuclear program started in early 1990s and it peaked in 2003 (12 years before the JCPOA). It's quite ignorant to say that Iran didn't have a nuclear program.
IR-40 was filled with cement. 10 years later, as of today in April 2025, we do not have another nuclear reactor.
13 tones of 3.5% enriched uranium + 20% enriched uranium were either sent abroad to Russia or convert into fuel cells. It took us over 6-7 years to recover from this alone.
 
Iran ICBM program stopped by Mr. Khamenei .
Iran Nuke program stopped by Mr. Khomeini and Mr. Khamenei .

If you really believe in what you said they I have doubt about your real purpose.
Read what I wrote again. I am blaming Khamenei too, not just Zarif.
 
You're clearly misinformed, or you are lying through your teeth.
IR-40 was filled with cement. 10 years later, as of today in April 2025, we do not have another nuclear reactor.
13 tones of 3.5% enriched uranium + 20% enriched uranium were either sent abroad to Russia or convert into fuel cells. It took us over 6-7 years to recover from this alone.
Why they didn't restart that project later can you explain to me?
Enriching that amount of uranium won't take that time.
And from the start the goal was to turn that uranium into fuel cell
 
Why they didn't restart that project later can you explain to me?
Enriching that amount of uranium won't take that time.
And from the start the goal was to turn that uranium into fuel cell
The parliament passed a bill to restart the program in 2018, by designing a new reactor which produces less amount of plutonium as a biproduct, but the system is corrupt to the bone at this point. IR-40 was one of the key cards of Iran in JCPOA and it was given in return for nothing.

Enriching 13 tones of uranium to 3.5% wont' take that much time with Iran's 10,000 SWU/kg? lol Again, either you are absolutely misinformed about nuclear technology or you're lying through your teeth as usual (speaking like a true reformist in Ahvaz).

Isn't Ahvaz the same city where they chanted "اگر هوا نداریم اما هوات رو داریم"? Pathetic. Ahvaz is like the California of Iran. Full of liberals who don't understand they're being played by the system.
 
Last edited:
By the way, if anyone cares for actual numbers, it takes 88 tones of UF6 gas and 104K SWU UF6/year to enrich 88 tones of uranium into 3.5%

So, with 10K SWU UF6/year, it would take more than 10 years. The JCPOA limited Iran's enrichment power to below 5K SWU UF6/year. With that restriction, it took Iran 20 years to recover from handing over our uranium to Russia.
 
Oh man, your words are strange.
Who put Jalili and Ghalibaf against each other to pave the way for Pezeshkian's presidency? While everybody knew that Jalili had zero chance of winning the election :)

Who put a limit on Iran's missiles, knowing full-well that the Europeans would jump on any chance to bomb Iran if the US ordered them to do so? Who constantly insists that we don't need nuclear weapons when the country is in serious danger from all sides now?
 
The deal deal accepted by parliament , supereme national security Council, guardian counsel and government and everybody else . Let blame Mr. Zarif for it .
Unfortunately true but still doesn't relieve Zarif and the Rouhani administration from their responsibilities in negotiating a bad deal. The JCPOA is a horrible agreement because it placed all implementation responsibilities on Iran alone without assigning a mechanism to hold the rest of signatories to account if and when they absconded on their obligations.
 
Trump signed an executive order to reimpose 'maximum pressure' against Iran and drive Iran's oil exports to 0

now we discover Iran's oil exports to China last month (March 2025) reached 1.9 million b/d, the highest level for several years

failure of maximum pressure sanctions

oil.jpeg
 
That doesn't make him any less of a treasonous c*nt that he is.
We are in this situation now because of the JCPOA and the snapback mechanism that Zarif negotiated and signed with the approval of Khamenei.

JCPOA set Iran's nuclear program back by 10 years without a single bullet and nearly zero gains for Iran. Again, I blame Khamenei more than I blame Zarif.

Zarif is a role model as much as Yazdgerd III or Naser-eddin Shah was a role.
No, Article 37 of the JCPOA allows any participant in the agreement (U.S., UK, France, Russia, China, Germany + Iran) to automatically reinstate UN sanctions against Iran if it violates the treaty. However, this only applies if the treaty is still in effect. In August 2020, the U.S. attempted to trigger the mechanism but was ignored by the Security Council because it had withdrawn from the agreement in 2018. Can the remaining members activate the snapback? They could try, as the U.S. did in 2020 (and failed), but it would likely be blocked before even reaching a vote—since the agreement was already violated by the U.S. (which is why the U.S. failed to trigger the snapback in 2020). Even if it passed this initial stage, it would then need full unanimous approval from the UN Security Council. In this case, China and Russia would veto it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top