Master Chief
Trusted Member
Interesting, but then the question is not about "culpability" for a surprise attack (since all is forgotten quickly as per your implication), but rather about the "capability" of that surprise attack to cause sufficient damage to the enemy while sustaining fewer damages oneself to make it a better option than the alternative (in this case, absorbing the first American attack and countering).counterpoint: Iran is going to get the blame anyway no matter what. Does anybody remember it was Israel that attacked Iran ? Nobody in the world seems to remember it and just blames Iran for everything.
It's a difficult calculus but if Tehran is doomed to be massively bombarded anyway, then it should perhaps strike first.





