Baadil
Registered Member
The USSR found a peer in its internal strife. The US is also following a path to implosion.The Soviets had US, a peer in many ways, and a superior in many other ways.
So far, we have not found any peer, let alone superior.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The USSR found a peer in its internal strife. The US is also following a path to implosion.The Soviets had US, a peer in many ways, and a superior in many other ways.
So far, we have not found any peer, let alone superior.
Why would any country trust Iran? Iran has history to create chaos and proxies in frendly countries. Take Pakistan for example. In 2020, Iran FM in India says that Pakistan is unsafe country and China should bring its investment in Iran port and should stop investing in Pakistan. That is why in real terms even China and Russia did not come in support of Iran because it has a rich history of Backstabing countries that helped Iran in tough times. Any way here what Iran is now thinking.
Actually, American Gen Z seems to be turning conservative.The USSR found a peer in its internal strife. The US is also following a path to implosion.
That's true, the cooperation is multifaceted. Gwadar is a good port for transporting Chinese goods from Xinjiang to Mideast, Africa and EU.One of China’s biggest strategic advantages is its ability to take the long view. The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) not only enhances China’s energy security, but also gives it a direct outlet to the Arabian Sea.
And if China wants to build real influence in the Islamic world, it needs a close and friendly partner — and Pakistan is perfectly positioned to play that role. There are also other factors, like counterterrorism cooperation and regional stability. So I don’t think China’s interest in Pakistan is solely about energy security — it goes much deeper than that.
How did you come up with these numbers? Do explain.Yes, only about $500 billions, but probably one trillion, and about 10 yrs of labor -- gone.
Not extensive at all.
Putin is a zionist cuck and was told by them to keep his hands off Zelensky, otherwise if Ukraine had been attacked by Western genocidal savages, he'd be dead with the opening hours of the conflict.Honestly, after witnessing this conflict, I’ve slightly revised my opinion of Zelensky, whom I used to dislike.
Despite losing vast territories in just a few days, facing an onslaught on his capital, and enduring intense airstrikes, he chose to fight relentlessly, mobilized his forces, and launched a counterattack without retreating a single step.
If Zelensky had been as cowardly as the Ayatollahs, he would have surrendered immediately, and Ukraine would have been occupied by Russia almost without a fight. And he would have justified it as a rational choice.
In the end, more than equipment or national strength, it's the leader’s will to fight that matters most. When the leader is gripped by fear and on the verge of surrendering, no soldier wants to die in a futile battle.
How did you come up with these numbers? Do explain.
I did something call 'keywords search'.Any proofs or reports to back up your claim Mr Gambit? Otherwise keep these figures to yourself. They seem very exaggerated.
Truckload of embarrassment for p.a.j.e.e.e.t.s. and Afghans in Iran.
What a shame!!!
That doesn't answer my question.I did something call 'keywords search'.Any proofs or reports to back up your claim Mr Gambit? Otherwise keep these figures to yourself. They seem very exaggerated.
In 2015, Sadjapour estimated that the cost to Iran would soon reach $500 billion.
Maybe you have heard of it? This is waaayyy before AI came along.
Try it. You may learn something.
Japan and Nazi Germany were two twin brothers in war crimes matching in every sense. The Imperial Japanese Army conducted live Chinese human experiments using germs and the like just as the Nazis used gas chambers. Any country in the world that china will have no moral hesitation to use nukes in war is Japan.In war crimes of modern warfare Japanese were at top in my opinion what they did to kids and woman for just time passing between soldiers was beyond r**** or murder. For me I believe I never wanna be woman, kid or prisoner of war to imperial japan.
USSR had Zionists devouring it from inside and US has a far worse infestation...The USSR found a peer in its internal strife. The US is also following a path to implosion.
If it's different location, different geographic made up, then it would be a different setting, Japan used to have a highly enriched facilities with JAEA (Sindai IIRC) and was since decommissioned in 1996, and the fuel transferred to Y-12 National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, it take about 2008 until the transfer is complete and it started to reintegrated into Y-12 last year. And you are talking about 2 established nuclear power, granted, it's intercontinental, but it's not going to be a quickie swap and go.....Well I’m guessing if Iran has another enrichment plant as they say they do operational won’t take as long to do what they need to if they decide to go ahead with a bomb right asking a real question your trying to be center for the most part and I actually appreciate that
Their zionist gods told them and they have received the truth being a loyal goy...That doesn't answer my question.
There's no official assessment either by Iran or the IAEA about the damage done to Iran's nuclear program. So, even if we believe that $500 billion dollar figure which is extremely ridiculous for two nuclear facilities, how did you realize how much of our nuclear program has been destroyed?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.