Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Iran shouldn´t rule out attacking them first preemptively to carry out an operation when Iran has restocked their missiles.

Just keep them hot for few days.

Or alternatively deliver all the best missiles to the Houthis to just keep bounding on them, Imagine if the Houthis missiles could inflict the damage the Iranian once have done.. Entire districts of Tel aviv would have rubbled
Iran will not be the first to deploy those weapons
But once zions arrogantly assume victory and dare to use any nuclear-related device, Iran will strike back with surprise weapons and catch them completely off guard

Changing the map from zion to Palestine

This is what Iran has planned to do

I'm not making up stories about Iranian weapons that are extremely more advanced than nuclear weapons 🔥🔥

My words will be proven in 5 months
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Qalibaf claims Khamenei was active in the war room personally (on at least two occasions) and Iran launched 150 missiles and 350 drones within 17 hours

he also claims Iran killed 500+ Israelis. which is obviously ludicrous and shows IRI has learned nothing from its decades of lies (just like 75% of missiles during TP2 accurately hit their target... and then they show Pezeshkian print outs of the same off target impacts that we all saw months earlier)

Much more than 500+ Israelis were killed
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.




People were arguing, IR was firing missiles at low rate!
And, specifically, some 'analysts/commentators' who have years of experience were hell bent on proving strikes were lame....

please question your sanity!
 
Snapback is not as simple as they thought because the US already left the agreement first and violated it, so this can be vetoed by Russia, China, etc.

What they will try to do is the following: send the snapback to the UN, and use the Zionist lobby in Russia (mainly) with the promise of a veto if Iran abandons its nuclear program, etc.
you don't understand how snapback works

any country can invoke it and once invoked you need unanimity to prevent it happening
 
Iran will not surrender—she will deploy a hyper-advanced weapon against Israel, completely wiping them out without resorting to mass destruction
we cannot keep our chief of staff or scientists safe but you think we have a super secret fantasy weapon that can completely wipe out our enemies (without resorting to mass destruction as well!) that IRI out of its good hearted nature did not use before?
 
well its actually what supreme leader said why blame him for that
show me where Khamenei said publicly that Americans can invest in Iran and that Israel not the USA is the problem

I don't care if 100 other people said it as well. Pezeshkian said it so he can be criticised for his words. you are very reactionary in defending everything the reformists do.
 
I think Iran definitely has game-changing advanced weapons like Plasma Weapons and Advanced Anti-Gravity Craft(utilizing Plasma and Zero-Point Energy/Free Energy) but they have kept it in reserve when they have to fight an all-out war with USA(since USA has many Black Project Anti-Grav Craft too)......
 
show me where Khamenei said publicly that Americans can invest in Iran and that Israel not the USA is the problem

I don't care if 100 other people said it as well. Pezeshkian said it so he can be criticised for his words. you are very reactionary in defending everything the reformists do.
and pezeshkian didn't said khamenei publicly said that:
by the way many people said khamenei support negotiation
you think what the result of those negotiation is supposed to be
 
and pezeshkian didn't said khamenei publicly said that:
by the way many people said khamenei support negotiation
you think what the result of those negotiation is supposed to be
I prefer to only judge people by what they say not what other people say they said

if you can find me Khamenei saying something like that we can talk about it, until then we only have Pezeshkian's statement

why are you so keen to deflect from Pezeshkian's statements? even if other people are bad, it means he is not?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Now i highly doubt that anyone at the range of our SRBMs will dare to attack us directly. Deterrence has been achieved for the countries at range of our SRBMs
 
I prefer to only judge people by what they say not what other people say they said

if you can find me Khamenei saying something like that we can talk about it, until then we only have Pezeshkian's statement

why are you so keen to deflect from Pezeshkian's statements? even if other people are bad, it means he is not?
wait and see if the claim will ever get denied.
 
and pezeshkian didn't said khamenei publicly said that:
by the way many people said khamenei support negotiation
you think what the result of those negotiation is supposed to be
Mr Khamenei said there are ten(s) of more important (foreign policy) issues than negotiation with US.

Government wanted this path ,Mr Khamenei even objected to it publicly like JCPOA (this time even bolder objection) , government forced their opinion and people paid for it with their lives as the result.
 
wait and see if the claim will ever get denied.
I don't really care if he denies it, unless he says it publicly it's irrelevant and I am talking about Pezeshkian. he is important enough to judge his words alone without having to deflect to someone else
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top