My point is Ukraine "surrendered" and was rewarded with racial annihilation as the generation of reproductive age and working age Ukrainian men were annihilated for nothing in return. Not exactly a model for Iran to try to follow.
And you think Russia is innocent in that? I don't get your comment at all. How did Ukraine surrender?
Ukraine made a choice to stop the Russian interference in their country. People wanted to approach the West for more opportunities. Russia had committed genocide in Ukraine during Stalin. Russia used ethnic Russians to create a civil war in Ukraine. If anything, Ukraine refused to surrender to Russia. It's funny how you're trying to twist facts.
They're not asking, PGCC lazy and degenerate sheiks don't want to lose their life of luxury and debauchery to some bearded headchopper. Groups like ISIS who only target the west's enemies almost certainly are getting direct western support.
The ISIS has targeted Europeans too. Al-Qaeda targeted Americans in 9/11. Radical Islam is a threat to the Western values. Much of the Western support for radical Islam in recent years has been as a counter-balance to Iran's growing power in the region.
I think people overestimate the amount of foreign investment Iran would see if sanctions were removed. There was minimal european investment after JCPOA and I don't think we would see much diaspora investment either.
That's your opinion. It goes against nearly every economic theory though. Sanctions on Iran have caused over 1 trillion USD of damage to our economy. That's 3 times our nominal GDP.
Iran followed "neither east nor west," lack of development of relations with China (who cares about zio Russia) is mostly Iran's fault.
Iran followed an anti-West/anti-Israel approach. Iran has been with the Eastern bloc since late 90s. The only exception is a short period of maybe 3-4 years after the JCPOA where Iran tried to be less dependent on the East. But other than that period, Iran has always been leaning towards Russia and China.
I don't understand what your point is here.
My point is that nearly every country that has tried to use the Eastern bloc as some sort of counter-balance against the West has turned into a failed state. The Eastern bloc will never help you or save you the way that the Westerners have supported their friends in the past.
Yes probably, but that would be the wrong move.
They may claim the same thing about your idea. It's wrong in your opinion, and they think you're wrong.
This is a historical fact, what is the alternative explanation you are providing?
Both Japan and Germany were great global powers before the war. The difference is quite clear. Eastern Germany was a miserable hell that people tried to escape from, while Western Germany was free and prosperous. This is a historical fact. The Eastern bloc weakened their part of Germany and turned it into a failed vassal state. The Western bloc helped Western Germany to prosper. Same thing goes for North Korea and South Korea.
Ask nearly every citizen in Iran and the world: North Kora or South Korea? Which one do you prefer to become? The answer is clear.
Since the Cold War ended, it's not really possible to name a country that turned west and benifitted from it. Armenia lost NK, Syria is still being bombed, South Sudan is the poorest country on Earth, Ukraine was used as cannon fodder. If there is an example I don't know about feel free to tell me about it.
Iraq, for example. People feel much happier under the US control compared to when Saddam ruled over there. So, stop spreading misinformation.