ShapurII
Trusted Member
Then they should drop their anti-Israel/anti-West rhetoric and follow the models of Saudi Arabia and Turkey.I.R doesn't believe in any cause , they just want to be in power.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then they should drop their anti-Israel/anti-West rhetoric and follow the models of Saudi Arabia and Turkey.I.R doesn't believe in any cause , they just want to be in power.
I will probably be the sole outlier here, but I think SNSC made the prudent decision here.
Iran needs every shot it can get to rebuild and re-arm.
Snapback sanctions would have been very damaging.
Iran needs to buy time.
This might delay an Israeli attack if the inspectors go there soon.
Yes, the E3 said they are no longer pursuing snap back.Will this allow for the snapback sanctions to be stopped ? Is that confirmed?
Yes, the E3 said they are no longer pursuing snap back.
They didn't say that. In fact, they said that Iran was not doing enough because the agreement with the IAEA did not include a deadline for Iran's obligations. And if Iran doesn't fulfill its obligations soon, they will still invoke the mechanism.Yes, the E3 said they are no longer pursuing snap back.
I think the point Afshin makes in a more extended version is that Israel eliminated Charlie Kirk because he started asking questions about Epstein and Israel's blackmail. He had a huge platform, but he used it many times to defend the genocide.So, Netanyahu bombed Tunisia, Qatar, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen but not Iran?
So, all of these countries matter but Iran who is sacrificing the most for a cause that is not even related to us does not?
it's part of being in power , for 4 decades they blamed all shortcomings and curroptions on the west ....Then they should drop their anti-Israel/anti-West rhetoric and follow the models of Saudi Arabia and Turkey.
the West won't fall for itAllowing the snapback to expire in October 2025 is the best outcome.
www.middleeasteye.net
My problem is not with the content. I mean he mentions every country that Israel has bombed but Iran.I think the point Afshin makes in a more extended version is that Israel eliminated Charlie Kirk because he started asking questions about Epstein and Israel's blackmail. He had a huge platform, but he used it many times to defend the genocide.
There are 3592 pages in this thread. There are only two state entities that have bombed Israel. Yemen and Iran. Iran is the only country that has laid to waste many critical areas, both economic and military (unknown in public, but with a high likelihood).
I will repeat it. Iran is a nuclear-weapon state. The mulla needs to make a decision, although with the recent capitulation, he seems less relevant.
The questions are, is the blackmail on IR officials about the embezzled dollars, and the threat of killing their families abroad( most likely), or honey trap sex blackmail, similar to Epstein.
Apparently, even the fake countries of PG leaders had visited Epstein, including Mohammed Bin Salman.
Yes, and it worked domestically but it's not working for them anymore. Their loud mouth has finally brought them to their final stage where large-scale war seems likely and inevitable.it's part of being in power , for 4 decades they blamed all shortcomings and curroptions on the west ....
Iranian foreign policy has bet on the wrong horse (the west) time and time again. I doubt that China will now come to the rescue.
@Persian Gulf