Iran Pakistan Relationship / News

At least @muhammed45 is already aware of Indians.
But all Iranians on PDF and elsewhere could benefit from the Indian channel video I posted above where the anchor said 'Thief' to describe both Iran and Pakistan.

at the end of the day, India has $600 billion in FOREX to pay for petroleum purchases. Say what you want, countries and their elites like to get paid for petroleum exports. a deadbeat like Pakistan has little leverage.

You can say Muslims should not care about economics, bla bla bla. When was the last time Pakistanis cared about Somalia, Niger, or Mauritania?
 
Whether India lost in May 2025 or not is largely immaterial: The world, perhaps even the Israelis, know the outcome of that conflict. A much weaker country in terms of population, economy, and military might like Pakistan stood its ground; even a 'stalemate' under those odds is a perceived 'victory'. And the global community is noting that. And thus I see Trump constantly heaping insults on India and I see Pakistani top leadership very active in international diplomacy since May 2025. And at least some of that will translate to tangible gains in economy and for Pakistan's defense.
All Pakistan needs now is stability, focus, and continuation of policies for the next 10-15 years. If Bangladesh achieved significant progress under a so-called 'Authoritarian', 'Corrupt' Hasina Wajid's 14 year rule then so can Pakistan. The major problem for Pakistan is not the military, or the politicians, or the corruption: It is the lack of peace and stability. One govt starts something and few years, another comes and stops that. Like starting to build a bridge and leaving it half done. Imagine the losses accumulated over the decades.
My focus for years, from the old PDF days, is a certain strategy for Pakistan: Stability, focus and continuation of policies. The rest will fall in place as Pakistan is put on that path. And I remain very optimistic that Pakistan is on that path in this 'do or die' situation.
You have the right ideas. The difference between Bangladesh and Pakistan is simple - Bangladesh did not have a bloated military. Under Hasina, Bangladesh had a working relationship with India and for that matter, China.

Pakistan went to the IMF in 2025.

In a world of tariffs, the risk to economic growth and investment is huge. you are being naive and optimistic here.
 
at the end of the day, India has $600 billion in FOREX to pay for petroleum purchases. Say what you want, countries and their elites like to get paid for petroleum exports. a deadbeat like Pakistan has little leverage.

You can say Muslims should not care about economics, bla bla bla. When was the last time Pakistanis cared about Somalia, Niger, or Mauritania?
If we cared that much about economy then supporting anti Zionist elements would have become the greatest stupidity of whole Iranian history past 7,000 years.
 
If we cared that much about economy then supporting anti Zionist elements would have become the greatest stupidity of whole Iranian history past 7,000 years.

If you cared about fighting Zionists, you would cease your oil exports to the rest of the world. It is the easiest way to remind the world.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
This whole narrative being built that a pro Zionist Iran will somehow be a threat to Pakistan is bogus. For 40 years Iran was under a highly pro Zionist shah and guess what we had a great relationship with that Iran ..we were strategic partners under Cento. Hamid mir et al have been pushing this narrative . I don’t think regime change in Iran will have any impact in Pakistan if you look at history
 
Last edited:

Dar expresses hope for peace, stability in Iran in phone call with Araghchi: FO


News Desk
January 17, 2026

Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar expressed his hope for peace and stability in Iran on Saturday, the Foreign Office (FO) said.

According to a post by the FO on X, Dar spoke with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in a phone call in which the two diplomats discussed the current situation in Iran and the wider region.

Dar “expressed hope for peace and stability, and both sides agreed to continue bilateral consultations on matters of mutual interest”, the statement added.
 
On Thursday, Pakistan had expressed hope at the United Nations Security Council for an early normalisation of the situation in Iran, which saw its largest demonstrations in years, challenging the country’s government.

Ambassador Asim Ahmad described Iran as a “brotherly country”, saying that the people of the two nations share deep-rooted historical, friendly, cultural and reli
gious bonds.

Protests have taken place across Iran in a movement sparked by anger over the rising cost of living, leading to authorities imposing internet restrictions.

US President Donald Trump had repeatedly threatened to intervene in support of protesters. However, monitors reported that the protests have subsided after a crackdown by security forces, while Trump declared that he had decided not to attack the country.

Meanwhile, the same day, FO spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said that instability in neighbouring Iran did not suit Pakistan, underscoring that calm and stability in Iran were directly linked to Pakistan’s own interests. He also said that Pakistan was engaging with Washington on the issue of tariffs being imposed on countries conducting trade with Iran.
 
I truly hate this poster I mean the tread-starter. You have been undoing Pakistan´s regional footing.

Iran never wanted to be friends with us period. Hence you doing the wrong azz kissing.

The Saudis, Gulfies, The Arabs and Turkey understand Iran and what it is all about but the Pakistanis do not somehow
 
1775397455936.png

President of the Islamic Republic of Iran Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, accompanied by Pakistani President General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq (on his left) and Prime Minister Mohammad Khan Junejo (on his right), salutes on January 13, 1986 upon his arrival in Islamabad, Pakistan, where he is to sign an Iran-Pakistan trade agreement.
 

In phone call with PM Shehbaz, Pezeshkian confirms Iran’s participation in Islamabad talks

News Desk
April 8, 2026

Iran President Masoud Pezeshkian has confirmed Tehran’s participation in Pakistan-offered peace talks with the United States in Islamabad to finalise a peaceful settlement to their conflict, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) said on Wednesday.

The confirmation came during a phone call with PM Shehbaz Sharif this afternoon, which lasted for over 45 minutes, according to PMO.

The US has not yet confirmed its participation in the talks, the invitation of which was extended by PM Shehbaz for April 10 (Friday). White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said earlier on Wednesday that “nothing is final until announced by the President or the White House”.

According to the PMO statement, Pezeshkian “confirmed that Iran would be participating in the negotiations in Islamabad”.

Terming the conversation “warm and cordial”, the PMO said the premier conveyed his “deep appreciation for the wisdom and sagacity of the Iranian leadership in agreeing to the ceasefire and for accepting the prime minister’s offer to host negotiations between Iran and the US in Islamabad later this week”.

The prime minister also conveyed his respects to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei.

According to PMO, President Pezeshkian thanked PM Shehbaz and “appreciated the efforts of the Pakistani leadership to bring about a temporary ceasefire between Iran and the US and conveyed his best wishes for the people of Pakistan”.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
PM Shehbaz also invited delegations from both sides to Islamabad on April 10 to “further negotiate for a conclusive agreement to settle all disputes”.

US President Donald Trump, responding to Pakistan’s request to “extend the deadline for two weeks”, had announced he would suspend the bombing of Iran for two weeks if Tehran fully reopened the vital Strait of Hormuz.

In turn, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi shared a statement on behalf of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council declaring that if attacks against the country were halted, it would cease its defensive operations.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top