Iranian Chill Thread

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


great workout music

But how can we dismantle the zionist regime without firing missiles? They have full economic and political support from the US. Maybe that support would be withdrawn once we are all dead and the next generation is old enough to become politicians.
 
But how can we dismantle the zionist regime without firing missiles? They have full economic and political support from the US. Maybe that support would be withdrawn once we are all dead and the next generation is old enough to become politicians.

Yeah I dont get this "lets sit on our hands and wait for them to destroy themselves" strategy. It's very expensive on human lives and time. There has to be some sort of skirmish.
 
Ehsan found something interesting.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


BA7DFEF6-4E0E-482E-ACF8-C54596557629.jpeg
 
Nuclear program since 1382

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Ehsan found something interesting.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


View attachment 32198

Okay so what are we looking at here and what is Ehsan trying to tell us? Bit confused here.
 
It’s airspace closures over Iran for next 2 days due missile firing.

I reckon it’s just missile testing though. I can’t see IRGC publishing any attack in advance.
 
Here is my take Iran should attack intelligently... And make Israel piss in their pants but don't attack with airstrikes or missiles it is irrelevance that will just give them the intention that it is not serious and tit for tat strikes which is bullshxt..

Learn from the Turks in this case........ make an agreement with Iraq and Syria to give you passage of land meaning threaten a conventional conflict.

Everyday Iran most start moving logistics, tanks, armoured vehicles towards the Iraqi border and thru Iraq's Abu Kamal into South Syria Deira area. Iran most mobilize approx 400.000 forces and bring them closer to the golan heights plus recruit from Iraq 400.000 volunteers and another 300.000 men from Lebanon and Syria that is over 1.1 mllion men if you add Hezbollah and Hamas cells in South Lebanon. Make sure everyday to post images of large conveys headed towards the front. Their throats will reach their mouths and they will call wastington crying.. It would be doomsday for them.

Now Israel will realize this is no joke and an existential threat of epic porportions if these forces move towards or inside Israel Wallahi they will not face defeat but overwhelm an already destroyed israeli armed forces. Iran should conduct from their strikes on Israel and if they respond move in but they won't respond when you are so close and just need an excuse to conduct an incursion.

1.1 Million forces armed to the teeth ready to throw down will be the worst nightmare ever.. They can't defeat Hamas conventionally who have destroyed nearly 90% of their forces do you think they can fight another conventional war of this porportions the answer is hell no.

Iran has this one thing Israel doesn't have which is scale and stragetic depth. Iran can effort war of attritution besides Israel is already fatigued. Iran has endless amount of cannon fodders a factory that doesn't run out. If Iran imposes themselves on Israel conventionally from South Syria I can assure you Israel's existence is over and if the Israel's use nukes then it would be worst for them just reply with 2 nukes and all Iran needs to do is hit Tel aviv and Haifa then it would be allover for Israel.

The Tiny Israeli states of the past have never been able to overcome the scale and vastness of the persians who have annexed them and enslaved them couple of times and if Iran came in with the right approch there won't be any difference they simply don't have the manpower, stragetic depth and scale to take on Iran if Iran approached this conventionally.. The Israelis only know tit for tat strikes which is child's play and not war at all just postering but they will shxt their pants if Iran does their due diligence and come Conventionally
 
Last edited:
But how can we dismantle the zionist regime without firing missiles? They have full economic and political support from the US. Maybe that support would be withdrawn once we are all dead and the next generation is old enough to become politicians.
? Haven't been watching the news the past 6 months?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


yet another deadly attack in Sistan and Balochistan, 5 more poor Iranian police officers martyred

this is a low level insurrection, General Pakpour told us only a few days ago that the area was returned to normal

it seems this is the new normal there

the police forces in this region are woefully unequipped to deal with this threat, in terms of equipment and training and everything else. Iranian Army or IRGC need to be deployed in big numbers to deal with this threat. this area is becoming lawless and we can't keep blaming Pakistan.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


yet another deadly attack in Sistan and Balochistan, 5 more poor Iranian police officers martyred

this is a low level insurrection, General Pakpour told us only a few days ago that the area was returned to normal

it seems this is the new normal there

the police forces in this region are woefully unequipped to deal with this threat, in terms of equipment and training and everything else. Iranian Army or IRGC need to be deployed in big numbers to deal with this threat. this area is becoming lawless and we can't keep blaming Pakistan.


If these terrorists are based in Iran, then no we can't blame Pakistan, but if they are coming from the Pakistani side, with weapons and training being done there, then why shouldn't we put some responsibility on Pakistan? Putting more people there would mean never ending deaths and skirmishes since the source of the issue is not being dealt with. Now building a wall may be an option.
 
If these terrorists are based in Iran, then no we can't blame Pakistan, but if they are coming from the Pakistani side, with weapons and training being done there, then why shouldn't we put some responsibility on Pakistan? Putting more people there would mean never ending deaths and skirmishes since the source of the issue is not being dealt with. Now building a wall may be an option.
even if they are based in Pakistan, we control our borders and we arm and train our police
 
even if they are based in Pakistan, we control our borders and we arm and train our police

You completely ignored the bit where I said that the source of the problem would still be untouched and there would be never ending skirmishes and deaths. Is that what you want?
 
You completely ignored the bit where I said that the source of the problem would still be untouched and there would be never ending skirmishes and deaths. Is that what you want?
I don't agree that sending better armed and better trained troops to have a more visible presence on the border region would have a negative effect on the security situation, this is illogical

secure the damn border and stop sending undertrained and under equipped 18 year olds to police that region when it is basically a low intensity war zone
 
I don't agree that sending better armed and better trained troops to have a more visible presence on the border region would have a negative effect on the security situation, this is illogical

secure the damn border and stop sending undertrained and under equipped 18 year olds to police that region when it is basically a low intensity war zone

No, we should definitely have better trained troops and have a similar focus of strength on the eestern border as we do on the western border. History has taught us that we face threats on both directions and they usually happen at the same time.

Having a human shield alone will not solve the problem though, if you want to see fewer deaths and skirmishes. There has to also be some sort of focus on the source of the issue, and if that means all we can do is apportion some responsibility on Pakistan to sort their side out then that should be part of the strategy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top