Iranian Chill Thread

Pakistan isn't admitting that it was cooperated because of political reasons

This is my 2cents about it, Iran held naval drills and FM was in Pakistan recently, this has no sense, also if it wasn't i think they would have retaliated quickly, the communiqué from Pakistan FM says itself that they are not going to retaliate, not "we will".

Exact same for Iraq.

Iran had a lot of work for the terror attack that killed 94 people last week, this is a rebranded Jundallah that killed hundreds of people in 2010s and killed 11 border guards to then hide in Pak balochistan, they said themselves they have been struck

It is in Pakistans interest to have Jaish destroyed, but Iran wasn't just going to wait indefinitely. What's amazing is all this gets overlooked, and all they want to now see is retaliation against the victim, which in this case was Iran. Seeing people's true Iranophobic colours on this forum was the real eye opener.
 
There are unofficial report that the target of Pakistan attack was hideout of a guy called "abdo-l-ghaffar naqshbandi" he is wanted in Iran for several terrorist acts
 
It's also low IQ derangement syndrome. They think Iran can't build nukes in short period of time.
Man, Iran derrangment syndrome is real here. It's okay to call for nuke strikes on Iran, but Iran is bad for retaliating. Madness!

Both calling for nuclear strike and retaliating is useless, provoking and borderline call and suppqrt for war crime as it's against forum rules.
On side not both provoking and against the rules and both the one who started it and the one who respond in such manner are punishable.
 
Both calling for nuclear strike and retaliating is useless, provoking and borderline call and suppqrt for war crime as it's against forum rules.
On side not both provoking and against the rules and both the one who started it and the one who respond in such manner are punishable.

Yeah I meant retaliating to this terror attack, I should have been more clearer there.
 
Good news.

Jews openly attacked Iran. We should respond to them openly too.

strategic Patience is enough
 
Last edited:

Good news.

Jews openly attacked Iran. We should respond to them openly too.

Enough strategic Patience

Ah but "Iran doesn't fight against Israel" apparently! Some people are so blind...
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Saudi-Iran FMs meet in Davos
 
Pakistani media reports Pakistan conducted airstrikes 50km inside Iran
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


If true, this is a massive **** up and embarrassment for the IRGC/Iran.

Hajizadeh / highest levels of Iranian military always emphasised that our red line was our sovereign territory. Well that red line just got violated. What are they going to do about it?

I at least hope Pakistan's strikes were more successful than our own, and did not kill any children.
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


But we can't let them think that IRGC or Iran has been attacked as these are the same terrorists who have essentially taken over Balochistan on both sides of the border. The thing is if Iran did nothing it would have got blamed for inaction against the terrorists. Honestly we need to stop putting our military between rock and hard place.
 
But we can't let them think that IRGC or Iran has been attacked as these are the same terrorists who have essentially taken over Balochistan on both sides of the border. The thing is if Iran did nothing it would have got blamed for inaction against the terrorists. Honestly we need to stop putting our military between rock and hard place.
read this

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


IRGC 1) damaged relations with Pakistan, 2) damaged Iranian sovereignty by inviting and tolerating Pakistani airstrikes inside Iranian territory, 3) killed Pakistani children, 4) potentially suffered and tolerated the killing of Iranian civilians by Pakistan in response and 5) destroyed IRGC/Iran's credibility by undermining everything they ever said about our red line being attacks on our territory as a lie

I wonder what the next move in their masterplan is
 
read this

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


IRGC 1) damaged relations with Pakistan, 2) damaged Iranian sovereignty by inviting and tolerating Pakistani airstrikes inside Iranian territory, 3) killed Pakistani children, 4) potentially suffered and tolerated the killing of Iranian civilians by Pakistan in response and 5) destroyed IRGC/Iran's credibility by undermining everything they ever said about our red line being attacks on our territory as a lie

I wonder what the next move in their masterplan is


Iran was forced to do something for years now. The Pakistanis were dragging their feet for reasons we all know for a proper cooperation with Iran, something that is needed to solve the issue as the tweet says at the end. Maybe this will be a new chapter that forces these two nations to cooperate and deal with the problem, because the alternative was to just sit and do nothing while our police get blown up or IRGC get assassinated. Pakistan have lost their fair share of soldiers to these kharijee groups.

1) relations can be mended but if the relationship was abusive and condusive to terrorism then who needs these kinds of relations?

2) is it really our land or their land when these groups have it on lock down and can kill people at will. It might as well be an autonomous enclave or a rump state.

3 and 4) that was regrettable, but even we have said this is part and parcel of military action. Do you think that no civilians would perish if Iran and Pakistan held hands and did the most wonderful allied coordinated attack on these groups?

5) this would be true if Iranian military or Iranian establishment was targetted. Should we have the same gheyrat for BLA terrorists?
 
Thread

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


damage to residential houses is large. families are reportedly trapped under rubble. significant number of civilian casualties is expected
 
Last edited:
Thread

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


damage to residential houses is large. families are reportedly trapped under rubble. significant number of civilian casualties is expected


They seem to be disproportionate, these ablah are moving just like their masters in the west and Israel.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top