Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The strategic targets to be hit must be factories, air bases, fuel tanks, facilities or sites that would take a long time or some time to repair, so that it would leave Israel open to Hezbollah bombardments for many weeks and make it easier for them to win.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Instead of hitting that many targets IMO, perhaps a precise, concentrated attack and decimation of a forward base could be considered - escalation ladder and true deterrence maintained.
If retaliation happens, another base is chosen and destroyed completely.
 
Instead of hitting that many targets IMO, perhaps a precise, concentrated attack and decimation of a forward base could be considered - escalation ladder and true deterrence maintained.
If retaliation happens, another base is chosen and destroyed completely.

I think it just means they have 80 potential targets they are considering hitting. That is not the same as they intend to hit all those 80 targets.

Iran may want to destroy some ABM radars and also raze one or two weapons producing factories to the ground, as proportional retaliation to the last Zionist attack.
 
Israel wants to cut off the flow of weapons from Syria to Hezbollah and has threatened to assassinate Bashar al-Assad if he does not agree

meanwhile, Ali Larijani is admitting that there is a very serious infiltration problem in Iran, after Israeli agents managed to launch at least dozens of military grade quadcopters at sensitive targets from inside Iran

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Israel wants to cut off the flow of weapons from Syria to Hezbollah and has threatened to assassinate Bashar al-Assad if he does not agree

Assassinating Assad would not be as simple as how they did it with Nasrallah as Assad has decent air defences from both Russia and Iran.

They even have batteries of the long range Khordad 15 which is one of the most advanced systems that Iran has and better than anything they have from Russia.

That is the reason why they can no longer drop bombs on targets in Damascus but need to rely on stand off weapons.

Assad will be well advised to be spending most of his time now in underground bunkers.

Edit - The attack on the Iranian consular building even with F-35s relied on stand off missiles. The days of Zionist planes overflying Damascus at will is long over.
 
Last edited:
Israel wants to cut off the flow of weapons from Syria to Hezbollah and has threatened to assassinate Bashar al-Assad if he does not agree

meanwhile, Ali Larijani is admitting that there is a very serious infiltration problem in Iran, after Israeli agents managed to launch at least dozens of military grade quadcopters at sensitive targets from inside Iran

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Israeli taking out Assad doesn’t make sense since his brother Maher (Commander of a Republican Guard division) would likely take over and he is more hardline than Assad.

Regarding Iran’s infiltration, in a country the size of Iran, it is not hard especially for a nation state to smuggle in quadcopters and weapons into the country.

If Iran can smuggle weapons into a blockaded Gaza, then of course Israel/US can smuggle weapons into Iran given its long porous borders.
 
Israeli taking out Assad doesn’t make sense since his brother Maher (Commander of a Republican Guard division) would likely take over and he is more hardline than Assad.

Regarding Iran’s infiltration, in a country the size of Iran, it is not hard especially for a nation state to smuggle in quadcopters and weapons into the country.

If Iran can smuggle weapons into a blockaded Gaza, then of course Israel/US can smuggle weapons into Iran given its long porous borders.
They can kill Maher too, they already hit his house a few months ago as a warning

The smuggling is understandably difficult to stop but the use of dozens (if not hundreds) of local agents is more unusual and unacceptable. we don't see that in other countries
 
The smuggling is understandably difficult to stop but the use of dozens (if not hundreds) of local agents is more unusual and unacceptable. we don't see that in other countries

Other countries aren’t under economic warfare and their populations experiencing hardships. Nor does their government keep certain regions underdeveloped (example Baluchistan and Ahwvaz provinces) which causes their population to sway towards extremism out of desperation and lack of education/work opportunities.

If Iranian economy was stronger and Iran was launching more projects in its underdeveloped regions you would have less people turning to crime and espionage. This is basic nation building 101.

You have 50%+ of country living in bad or poverty conditions and now you are shocked you got “hundreds” of vatan foorooshes running around?
 
Other countries aren’t under economic warfare and their populations experiencing hardships. Nor does their government keep certain regions underdeveloped (example Baluchistan and Ahwvaz provinces) which causes their population to sway towards extremism out of desperation and lack of education/work opportunities.

If Iranian economy was stronger and Iran was launching more projects in its underdeveloped regions you would have less people turning to crime and espionage. This is basic nation building 101.

You have 50%+ of country living in bad or poverty conditions and now you are shocked you got “hundreds” of vatan foorooshes running around?
What a stupid comment you made.
First, where did you get this 50%? Second, in terms of economic progress, all regions of Iran are getting better every year.
Third, terrorism is regions like kurdistan and Baluchistan are made because of Wahhabism and separatism It has nothing to do with the economy
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top