Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

Xerxes22 said:
I don't expect you to understand. It's indefensible to ally with a group with such disregard for human lives regardless of the objective. They are not even humans. You can even ally with backstabbers if it serves a purpose but not these murderers
Click to expand...

Hypocrisy sir.

Russia under Stalin murdered far more population of the world than US in past century.

China under Mao murdered far more powerful population of the world than US in past century and as we speak their concentration camps murder incalculable # of Sunni Muslims. Yet no word from Iran.

Saudi Arabia/Kuwait/etc murdered far more Iranians in the past half century by bankrolling Saddam’s war than anyone else. Again we have diplomatic relations with Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and refer to them as “brotherly nations”.

Yet we deal with all these countries, why?

The US was relatively isolationist until WW2. And only came in because Japan gave them a rally around the flag moment.

Fast forward to the 2000’s when it came to sanctions yes U.S. was the leader, but Europeans went along and sometimes pressed a harder line (UK/France) and our own “allies/friendly nations” like Russia and China voted for security council sanctions/resolutions as well.

Yet we continue to deal with all nations (friendly or otherwise) except the one that sets the rules (US).

How does that make sense?

What have we done in past 45 years to make US bend to our will or treat us as equal? We are no where near closer than we were in the 90’s. We just have more domestic weapons and a latent nuke capability….against a country that spends $1T a year on its military.

Iran can get its fair share of punches in a direct conflict, but U.S. would absolutely decimate Iran’s core areas (military, energy, infrastructure, etc). Then you get someone that will scream “we will use nukes”. Yeah doubtful and all that will do is get Iranian cities wiped off the map. “Well if we have nukes then U.S. won’t dare hurt us”. And yet Russia and North Korea both get hurt (just indirectly) and both have nukes.

Iran is stuck in a riddle it cannot solve. Or solving it requires events to occur that may never occur.

This plan to outlast America is not a plan any more than a gambler planning to outlast his loan sharks.
 
Last edited:
mangekyo said:
I honestly believe that those who are gloating IRIs incompetence are more likely to be zionists.
Click to expand...

I have similar thought. Or at best they are fragile fanboys who think this is Xbox vs PlayStation or Persepolis vs Esteghlal. They cannot tolerate criticism in any fashion as it feels like they personally “losing”. When in reality many have zero skin in this game. Their lives will not change meaningfully from any of the outcomes. Only those in Iran.

Objective criticism is what holds leaders accountable. Or else the rosy or plain Baghdad Bob approach just masks the inefficiencies then everyone acts shocked when collapse happens (Assad, Soviet Union, Afghanistan circa 2022).

The problem is despite our criticism as human beings, Iran continues to not adapt to recent developments.

So Occam’s razor says we must conclude either

A) Iran refuses to adapt

B) Iran cannot adapt

The arrival of Trump in 2017 sparked the start of aggressive containment of Iranian expansion that continued relatively unabated from 2001 to 2016.

The start of the Iran-Israel Shadow war from 2012-Present also marked a shift as Israel was given a green light by U.S. to “mow the grass” on Iranian expansion efforts beyond its borders.
 
Mr Iran Eye said:
I am waiting for proof of Israel's successful super attack with dozens of radars and many air defense systems destroyed. I want to see and not read fantasies about the IDF
Click to expand...
There isn't any, it didn't happen. If they did, like they did in Syria, they would have already struck weapon stockpiles, nuclear sites, anything they view as a threat. Like they are doing in Syria now.
Immortals said:
The US was relatively isolationist until WW2. And only came in because Japan gave them a rally around the flag moment.
Click to expand...
Very weird statement, as if the Monroe Doctrine didn't exist and that the US wasn't constantly at war and aggressively expanding throughout the 18th and 19th centuries. But even then when they weren't busy in the half of the planet they claimed as theirs, they had time to stop by and occupy the Phillipines, intervene in Russia and China, and of course take part in WW1. Are we forgetting "Israeli" settler colonialism is based off the US model and served as an inspiration for Nazis?
 
Last edited:
R2D2 said:
Enemy of an enemy (US) is a friend.
Click to expand...
Moral arguments aside. There are multiple historical precedents that suggest that arming a group that fundamentally hates you just because you have mutual enemies results in long term blowback. Any support Iran theoretically sends them would likely be used to harm Iranians in the future.
 
Last edited:
Immortals said:
Hypocrisy sir.

Russia under Stalin murdered far more population of the world than US in past century.

China under Mao murdered far more powerful population of the world than US in past century and as we speak their concentration camps murder incalculable # of Sunni Muslims. Yet no word from Iran.

Saudi Arabia/Kuwait/etc murdered far more Iranians in the past half century by bankrolling Saddam’s war than anyone else. Again we have diplomatic relations with Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and refer to them as “brotherly nations”.

Yet we deal with all these countries, why?

The US was relatively isolationist until WW2. And only came in because Japan gave them a rally around the flag moment.

Fast forward to the 2000’s when it came to sanctions yes U.S. was the leader, but Europeans went along and sometimes pressed a harder line (UK/France) and our own “allies/friendly nations” like Russia and China voted for security council sanctions/resolutions as well.

Yet we continue to deal with all nations (friendly or otherwise) except the one that sets the rules (US).

How does that make sense?

What have we done in past 45 years to make US bend to our will or treat us as equal? We are no where near closer than we were in the 90’s. We just have more domestic weapons and a latent nuke capability….against a country that spends $1T a year on its military.

Iran can get its fair share of punches in a direct conflict, but U.S. would absolutely decimate Iran’s core areas (military, energy, infrastructure, etc). Then you get someone that will scream “we will use nukes”. Yeah doubtful and all that will do is get Iranian cities wiped off the map. “Well if we have nukes then U.S. won’t dare hurt us”. And yet Russia and North Korea both get hurt (just indirectly) and both have nukes.

Iran is stuck in a riddle it cannot solve. Or solving it requires events to occur that may never occur.

This plan to outlast America is not a plan any more than a gambler planning to outlast his loan sharks.
Click to expand...
The Jewish dirty business has been around for centuries. Since before the time of Napoleon when these Jewish financiers used to blackmail Royalties and marry their children to European royalty and then infiltrate them.

Jewish dirty business is wat caused both the world wars. Jewish dirty business is what caused the stir in Germany which paved the way for Hitler's rise. It could even be that the whole thing of Jewish mass murder was orchastrated by elite Jews in order to have all Jews migrate to the middle east for the establishment of a Jewish state.

So the point is that these people have fed on not on a certain nation or a group but the entire world for the last 500 years. And they run America. This is not conspiracy theory, that's a fact when you know who owns the financial institutions.

Iran can only make agreements and treaties with America but can never ever be in an alliance with them. Because America is run by Jews. But even if they are not And Barron Trump cleans the swamp one day, I wonder who's worse? The evangelical wannabe christian Zionists or the Jewry?

In case the Jews are cast away and America made free, you have zealots who love Israel for the fake gospel known as the bible. The sun worshipping religion of Christianity "Luuuwwwvvzzz" Israel, and Israel if it retains state hood will always try to destroy Iran, it's them against the world always.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


We have heard many times about an impending ceasefire, but if this time it is true, I would bet against TP3 ever happening.
 
Immortals said:
I have similar thought. Or at best they are fragile fanboys who think this is Xbox vs PlayStation or Persepolis vs Esteghlal. They cannot tolerate criticism in any fashion as it feels like they personally “losing”. When in reality many have zero skin in this game. Their lives will not change meaningfully from any of the outcomes. Only those in Iran.

Objective criticism is what holds leaders accountable. Or else the rosy or plain Baghdad Bob approach just masks the inefficiencies then everyone acts shocked when collapse happens (Assad, Soviet Union, Afghanistan circa 2022).

The problem is despite our criticism as human beings, Iran continues to not adapt to recent developments.

So Occam’s razor says we must conclude either

A) Iran refuses to adapt

B) Iran cannot adapt

The arrival of Trump in 2017 sparked the start of aggressive containment of Iranian expansion that continued relatively unabated from 2001 to 2016.

The start of the Iran-Israel Shadow war from 2012-Present also marked a shift as Israel was given a green light by U.S. to “mow the grass” on Iranian expansion efforts beyond its borders.
Click to expand...

There are fanboys on each side:

If you think that attack on Shahrood hampered solid fuel production to one missile a week, you are a fanboy too.

Houthis make multiple missiles a week despite all attacks. How can you believe such story.

If you think all S300 radars were hit, you are a fanboy. Most S300 radars were in Natanz and Fordow.
 
Fact is:

Attack on Shahrood can barely touch solid fuel production no matter how many tweets you see.

Leave the twitter and think for your self.
 
Do I have any problems with mullahs and TP2?

Yes for example
Why did they hit taxiways with precise missiles? They had to go for more important stuff.
 
مهم‌ترین ایراد من
به جای خرید از صاایران‌ رفتند و خارجی خریدند

اونقدر شلخته بازی در آوردند که همه روسا لو رفته بودند

چرا این ترورها در یمن انجام نشد
چون‌ ما خیلی به حزب الله مغرور شدیم و‌نتیجه رو‌دیدید
 
Immortals said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


Why not - keep them on a leash. If Syria does not pay, then who else will invest in Syria. The debt is country to country, not goverment or individuals.
 
Shawnee said:
مهم‌ترین ایراد من
به جای خرید از صاایران‌ رفتند و خارجی خریدند

اونقدر شلخته بازی در آوردند که همه روسا لو رفته بودند

چرا این ترورها در یمن انجام نشد
چون‌ ما خیلی به حزب الله مغرور شدیم و‌نتیجه رو‌دیدید
Click to expand...

تا اونجایی که من میدونم این پیجرا چند با از لحاظ فنی چک کامل شده بودن، ولی یه مشکلی تو باطریشون وجود داشت که نمیشد بهش پی برد
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 9 (members: 0, guests: 9)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top