It doesn't really take a genius to figure out that the failure of international law and justice in the face of openly declared genocide could have been used as a justification of why nuclear weapons are necessary to defend oneself.
It's a shame Iran's leaders have shown such terrible judgement, both in identifying the nature of the US-"Israeli" relationship, and in pursuing a nuclear program and suffering the decades of sanctions as a result, only to end up with one 915MW power plant (a quarter of UAE's only NPP) and a declared fatwa against nuclear weapons. When the US strikes Iran's nuclear sites, what will have been gained after these many decades and what leverage do you have left for removal of sanctions? We have already seen Iran's ballistic missiles will be left to rust in silos and are not intended to be used after "Israel" struck Iran and killed Iranians to no response, so it is a matter of when, not if the strike will come. I suspect historians will be baffled by this strategy when looking back at these events in the future.