Russian hypersonic ballistic missile RV impact velocity visibly significantly faster than Iranian MRBMs
That’s an incomplete statement, ergo irrelevant.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Russian hypersonic ballistic missile RV impact velocity visibly significantly faster than Iranian MRBMs
Now that statement is more thoughtful. Speed is irrelevant if precision is unaccounted for. Speed is irrelevant if a certain speed overcomes what minimum speed is needed to escape ABMs.The Iranian missiles seemed to manoeuvre, and some appeared to speed up prior impact?
Plus they utilised several decoys...different methodology.
Ummm—incorrect and without rationale.View attachment 82908
I don't know how much we need to pay North Korea for this technology transfer but we should pay it no matter how much it is
What are we going to do with it? Fire at Europe? The US?View attachment 82908
I don't know how much we need to pay North Korea for this technology transfer but we should pay it no matter how much it is
Russians have basically handed everything to them on a plate.View attachment 82908
I don't know how much we need to pay North Korea for this technology transfer but we should pay it no matter how much it is
the comparison is clearThe Iranian missiles seemed to manoeuvre, and some appeared to speed up prior impact?
Plus they utilised several decoys...different methodology.
the comparison is clear
russia showed us what IRBM warheads impacting at mach 10+ look like ...
most of Iran's MRBMs impact at mach 3-5, we did see some faster warheads used likely impacting above mach 5 but nothing close to mach 10 yet
the comparison is clear
russia showed us what IRBM warheads impacting at mach 10+ look like ...
most of Iran's MRBMs impact at mach 3-5, we did see some faster warheads used likely impacting above mach 5 but nothing close to mach 10 yet
This is a view of the landing of a missile that Ukraine claims is a Russian ICBM.
It appears to be on a different level of speed and power than the missile used by Iran.
In comparison, the Iranian missile looks like a miniature.
If Iran had such weapons, the attitude of the U.S. and Israel toward Iran would surely be different.
Iran's missile industry still has a lot of work to do.
The U.S. has pointed out that this missile is actually an MRBM.
This difference in power is quite striking, as the missile belongs to the same MRBM class used by Iran in its attack on Israel.
the comparison is clear
russia showed us what IRBM warheads impacting at mach 10+ look like ...
most of Iran's MRBMs impact at mach 3-5, we did see some faster warheads used likely impacting above mach 5 but nothing close to mach 10 yet
what was the distance travelled?Russia said their missiles travel time was 7 minutes. So their faster speed was only in terminal phase.
This is a view of the landing of a missile that Ukraine claims is a Russian ICBM.
It appears to be on a different level of speed and power than the missile used by Iran.
In comparison, the Iranian missile looks like a miniature.
If Iran had such weapons, the attitude of the U.S. and Israel toward Iran would surely be different.
Iran's missile industry still has a lot of work to do.
The U.S. has pointed out that this missile is actually an MRBM.
This difference in power is quite striking, as the missile belongs to the same MRBM class used by Iran in its attack on Israel.
I disagree.I agree
unfortunately there is too much uncritical fanboy hopium here that prefers to find excuses or explanations
I agree
unfortunately there is too much uncritical fanboy hopium here that prefers to find excuses or explanations
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.