Flotilla
Trusted Member
That´s suggestion it is just a endorsement to all iranian nuclear ambitions.
Iranian Nuclear Doctrine
- Thread starter jauk
- Start date
Nightlamp
Registered Member
Israel razed Gaza to the ground and murdered over 50,000 civilians, you think they are not seriously contemplating using such weaponry ? It’s a real risk in the conflict between Israel and Iran.
Flotilla
Trusted Member
They (Israel) knows that if they just attack any nuclear site (even with conventional bombs) Dimona will be just received some hundreds of weapons. I am pretty sure they won´t use nuclear weapons because Iran will build in some days nuclear warheads for fitting over very well known missiles.
Khorasan Black Flags
Trusted Member
shapurzolaktaf
Registered Member
Yes in the case that we don't create at least 500 nuclear bombs long term, 50 short term.
BHAN85
Trusted Member
North Korea was threatened by USA and survived thanks to nuclear weapons.
Iraq/Lybia was threatened by USA, not had nukes, and they were destroyed.
Iran is threatened by USA, so they are doing the only possible way of survival.
Kyussis
Trusted Member
Iran is not Iraq of 2003 and Lybya was not invaded by the U.S so it wouldn't have made any difference if Gadhafi had Nuclear weapons or not. Was Gadhafi gonna nuke the U.S or E.U to "save" his a$$ if he had Nukes? Libya would have been incinerated in return!
DavidKhoresht
Registered Member
I think the ship has sailed for Iranian nuclear weaponization. There are too many Mossad and CIA moles in the IR. Khamenei and the pure IRGC (not the moles within the IRGC) would be assassinated if they decided to gun for the bomb. I believe Iran's government is even more compromised than Hezbollah was. It's the head of the snake and it just makes sense Israel would have invested most of its intelligence there.
The best time to bumrush for the bomb would have been right after October 7th as the Israelis and West were scrambling to put things on the ground to launch their offensive. Ideally, even before Oct 7th. Iran's mistake is that it never took weaponization seriously. It needed the bomb because at any moment its non-Hezbollah proxies could have gone rogue, especially Hamas, and that would have put the Axis of Resistance to the test and required them to intervene.
The best time to bumrush for the bomb would have been right after October 7th as the Israelis and West were scrambling to put things on the ground to launch their offensive. Ideally, even before Oct 7th. Iran's mistake is that it never took weaponization seriously. It needed the bomb because at any moment its non-Hezbollah proxies could have gone rogue, especially Hamas, and that would have put the Axis of Resistance to the test and required them to intervene.
DavidKhoresht
Registered Member
Iran has about 10,000 missiles of all sizes. Any more and Iran wouldn't be able to afford the maintenance or find places for storage. Missile cities are enormously costly.
What's more is that these missiles are Iran's sole source of deterrence outside of the proxies, which were rendered toothless over the past year. Iran cannot afford to saturate Israel the way people think, lest it leave itself absolutely naked and entice Turkey and Azerbaijan to go for a land grab. And definitely considering how the entire region, the US, the UK, the Dutch and others coalesced to protect Israel from Iranian missiles. In the event of a mass retribution or attack by Iran, they will invest enough to put the American economy into a tailspin, that's how much Israel controls U.S politicians.
Tijani
Registered Member
Khorasan Black Flags
Trusted Member
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
maximalist position from USA will not yield any results
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
lol
Mehdipersian
Trusted Member
Earthquakes happen a lot in Iran
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
Latest Posts
-
-
-
‘Indians taking over’: How hate campaigns are targeting diaspora from Singapore to US (15 Viewers)- Latest: Dalit
-
-