Iranian Nuclear Doctrine

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I'm surprised to say this, but Ahmadinejad was by far the best president of Iran.
Iran made tremendous progress in academic research, radars, metallurgy, nuclear science and ballistic missiles during his presidency. And it all slowed down as soon as he left.
 
I'm surprised to say this, but Ahmadinejad was by far the best president of Iran.
Iran made tremendous progress in academic research, radars, metallurgy, nuclear science and ballistic missiles during his presidency. And it all slowed down as soon as he left.
if you belive all that happened there was the result of one year of ahmadinejad work

Usually what is unveiledbin first term of a president is the result of the work previous president started
 
I'm surprised to say this, but Ahmadinejad was by far the best president of Iran.
Iran made tremendous progress in academic research, radars, metallurgy, nuclear science and ballistic missiles during his presidency. And it all slowed down as soon as he left.
His hig level of IQ, wisdom, great courage, and strong foreign policies remind me of the great kings we had throughout the 5000 year recent history of Iran

In my eyes he was second to Ayatollah Raisi
 
Last edited:
if you belive all that happened there was the result of one year of ahmadinejad work

Usually what is unveiledbin first term of a president is the result of the work previous president started
Sure, but why did it stop or significantly slow down after he left?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Trump suggests rebuilding nuclear sites at new locations, it could suggest that the current sites are too well protected for the US to destroy
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Trump suggests rebuilding nuclear sites at new locations, it could suggest that the current sites are too well protected for the US to destroy

Their own intelligence services suggested the strikes "delayed the program by some months"

They tried to counter the leak by saying "but it was a worst case scenario" or that "it's bullshit, the program has been delayed by 50 years". They destroyed the entrances, they can't destroy a single Yemeni underground complex, and they want to make us believe they completely destroyed 80+m deep Fordow and 200+m deep missile cities? GBU-57 FLOP isn't going to change anything, their top bombs have been proven to not meet at all the penetration that was advertised

Anything else is delusions and evangelical hasbara

Natanz-2 is going to be multiple times more protected than Natanz and Fordow
 

How does Iran plan to enrich to 90%? What are these empty threats?
 

How does Iran plan to enrich to 90%? What are these empty threats?
Probably Irán has small alternatives enrichment facilities out of the watchdogs of AEIA.
Irán has no a modern multimission operative Air force. It has no real a high seas Navy, and the missile stock have been affected. But for westeners the Iranian selfconfidence It is surprising or suicidal. And I choosed to believe that IRI has some unseen cards.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Trump suggests rebuilding nuclear sites at new locations, it could suggest that the current sites are too well protected for the US to destroy

Natanz-2 and Qazvin are under in progress and out of reach of GBU-57s

the question is just what centrifuges and centrifuge production capability is left
 
@shapurzolaktaf @ShapurII @FUB @muhammed45 @Mehdipersian

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


View attachment 136006

همه اینها رو هممون می‌دونیم اما راه چاره چیه؟
نظام پشت این داستان هست. وگرنه باید ظریف رو تیکه تیکه می‌کردن، نه اینکه برجام رو ۲۰ دقیقه‌ای تصویب کنن
برجام چیزی کمتر از ترکمانچای نداشت. ننگ تاریخی شد برای آیندگان که بخونند و ما رو نفرین کنن که چقدر اینها بی‌غیرت بودن هیچ کاری نکردن​
 
همه اینها رو هممون می‌دونیم اما راه چاره چیه؟
نظام پشت این داستان هست. وگرنه باید ظریف رو تیکه تیکه می‌کردن، نه اینکه برجام رو ۲۰ دقیقه‌ای تصویب کنن
برجام چیزی کمتر از ترکمانچای نداشت. ننگ تاریخی شد برای آیندگان که بخونند و ما رو نفرین کنن که چقدر اینها بی‌غیرت بودن هیچ کاری نکردن​
امیدوارم عبرت تاریخی بشه

و بهای سنگینش این نباشه که ما مثل لیبی و عراق و سوریه و لبنان و فلسطین و یمن و افغانستان، بخاطر کج فهمی، خیانت و نفوذ عده ای زیر چرخ های ظلم و استبداد و استعمار خورد بشیم

باید شیطانک های کوچک اطرافمون رو هم در نظر بگیریم نه فقط امریکا، صهیونیست و متحدانش رو
 
Last edited:
There are also non-nuclear hydrogen bombs



I have absolutely no clue how difficult it is to build these, but the nuclear path is obviously not the only path, and there is no international monitoring (like IAEA) required....so maybe Iran is also working on these, or on other types of hydrogen bombs (if they exist).
 
There are also non-nuclear hydrogen bombs



I have absolutely no clue how difficult it is to build these, but the nuclear path is obviously not the only path, and there is no international monitoring (like IAEA) required....so maybe Iran is also working on these, or on other types of hydrogen bombs (if they exist).

I searched for "Magnesium hydride Iran" and I found Iranian studies:

www.magiran.com/paper/1271155/modification-on-properties-of-magnesium-hydride-for-hydrogen-storage?lang=en


www.jamt.ir/article_70350.html?lang=en


I absolutely don't know if these have any importance for hydrogen bombs, but the topic "magnesium hydride" is not foreign to Iranians....so who knows what is researched/build secretely....

And again, maybe there are also other ways to build a hydrogen bomb...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top