The idea of peace in South Asia died upon independence 1947. When Hindu and Sikh fanatics decided to try to cleanse places like Punjab and Kashmir of Muslims, while the Indian government captured withheld funds to Pakistan, thinking they'd be able to strangle the country upon inception, choke it by capturing additional territory, and coerce it into joining India.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem or something? It's enclave exclave situation where a small piece of land maybe surrounded by India, or Myanmar basically having a Myanmar inside India or India inside Myanmar and most of it is some forested land. These are survey issues that are easily settled and not a border dispute. Is that the big find of "border dispute".
Not really, anyone can raise a border dispute like Nepal did but have since backtracked. As I said Indian border with Nepal is the same since 1947. We ratified a treaty with them in 50's making it legal. The rest are noises by Nepali politicians which changes with government. Chinese have border disputes with every one of its neighbours so paint me surprised they are an irrendentist power.
Lol.
ukhrultimes.com
Finds some opinion crap from a rag paper and starts jumping up and down. Lol! Indian Myanmar border is getting fenced up and we are going to settle border points of any issues. Someone wrote up a fictional story that India is going to exchange land with Myanmar and people ran with the story.Lol.
You're such a Copeistani. If you disagree with my assertions, simply ignore them! Meanwhile I shall post away..
India-Myanmar Boundary Agreement: Why the Mistakes of 1967 Must Not Be Repeated
On 5th August 2026, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) was asked to clarify reports suggesting that India and Myanmar were considering a territorial
"Between the 1960s and 1970s, the border dispute became more visible, especially around Border Pillars (BPs). 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 21, and 23 in Manipur. For Manipur, shifting the border meant the potential loss of substantial areas of land. Moreover, after the Sino-Indian War, 1962, China pressured the Burmese government on the boundary agreement and to shift the border westward. In India, the parliamentary representatives from the Northeast, including Hem Barua and George Gilbert Swell, questioned the “technical accuracy” of the 1967 boundary map and the alignment of the boundary pillars that could result in territory loss.
What initially appeared to be a “technical accuracy” issue over maps and boundary pillars gradually became a question of territorial loss. By 1970, the Ministry of External Affairs was aware that the boundary needed to be resolved diplomatically, as India faced potential territorial losses in the sectors of BPs 6-10, 21, and 23. Then, India proposed adjusting BP 33 west of Tuipang and shifting BP 34 about 200 yards south, giving Burma approximately 0.7 sq. miles in exchange for avoiding changes to BPs 6-10, 21, and 23. Burma rejected the proposal, seeking a further westward realignment that would also transfer Bongmal Thampak to Burma, which India feared would provoke public opposition. A 1974 Survey of India assessment further estimated that relying solely on the 1967 map positions would result in a net loss of approximately 1.4 sq. miles for India between BPs 1 and 39.
In a confidential letter to J.C. Ajmani, the then Director of the North-Eastern Circle, Colonel M. M. Datta, military surveyor, pointed out that India could lose around 1.58 sq. miles by accepting the existing positions of 31 boundary pillars. He noted that, along with the disputed areas around BPs 6-10, 21 and 23, India could lose territory of approximately 2.60 sq. miles due to errors in the 1967 map. He therefore suggested that India should not be put in a position of “losing territory twice”. However, the issue remained unresolved, and the planned boundary treaty was never concluded. In fact, India was willing to cede some territory. However, admitting mapping errors and accepting Burma’s demands risked public opposition."
..."Losing territory twice"....to effing Burma, the military junta.
Lol, a lie being told by Indians repeatedly for a million times is still a lie, an Indian lie.
"going to settle", as in, there is an "issue" that is yet to be resolved.
We had unresolved border issue with Bangladesh as well. Which was settled after "exchanging" territories. These are not worth spending much energy over. You bring it up as if we are in some war like situation like you have it with Afghans. Lol!
What dispute India has with Sri Lanka or Bhutan Maldives? Or Bangladesh?India is the country which indeed has disputes with every neighbor.
Meanwhile two coast guard Chinese "one child's" died trying to ram their boats at a Philippines vessel, they fumbled and collided with their own ships while the Pinoys dodged and made a fool of you.
Do you know land neighbors? if you count in the ocean, suddenly the whole world is your neighbor, China has 14 land neighbors and India is the only country which China has murderous border with, all the other 13 countries enjoy peaceful and prosperous border regions with China.
