I think you both mean well but if you saw the history of this conflict then that would leave you in no doubt that the Arab countries are a beaten force; they tried multiple times but failed. They have too heavy odds against them.
The United States not only won World War II but also a few decades later prevailed over the Soviet Union Superpower. And since the early 90s, the Americans have been prevalent and unchallenged. Lot of countries, including even China and Russia, heavily invested their fortunes in America and its rich powerful allies. Compared to them, the Arab countries are small fries for the Americans to freeze their assets, expel from the SWIFT banking system, and even carpet bomb them using the American attack dog Israel and the American vassals in Europe. It would be a war Americans could afford to lose more than the regional countries: Americans can always go back to their distant island nation which is blessed with lots of abundance and geographic protection. The wreck will be in the Middle East and Europe. You don't want a war where Americans would be forced to 'mobilize' their immense resources.
So... once again, the way forward is bleeding Israel through prolonged wars of attrition without involving the Americans directly. Israel's very own geography and its pampered dual-citizen population makes Israel especially vulnerable to any conflict, especially the prolonged ones. And we can already see the fleeing Zionists, a divided political class, a deeply worried society, and uncertainty about Israel's very survival. All that when the Resistance has barely used its resources against Israel.