Israel’s Genocide in Gaza | 2023- till present

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have nothing to achieve in this fight : I'm french and atheist....

I just have a look to the situation : Israel with the more effective army in the ME, with USA giving them weapons on a side, and 30.000 "soldiers", with now no more weapon supply, with nearly 45% of the gaza band under the israeli army rules.... No need to be a specialist to see who will win.

Civilian genocide? Ask Hamas why they made so many crimes mainly on civilians 7th october? Strangely There was not a single israeli settler in gaza band.
why israel made so many crime in last 75 years against civilians ? why specially targeting reporters in all their conflict , in all WW2 less reporter died than the last 6 month in Gaza and south of Lebanon.
 
I find it surprising that Israel utilized only 1/4 of its air force in Gaza. According to Jonathan Conricus during the peak of air attacks in Gaza, Israel employed only 1/4 to 2/4 of its air force. The explanation given is that the other half was kept on standby in case of a potential Hezbollah attack. Israel possesses a remarkably powerful air force. Once the Gaza conflict concludes and Hezbollah becomes the primary target, it will be a daunting experience for Hezbollah.

This is mainly because Israel can now focus all its air power on Hezbollah. I have been asserting for some time that a full out war against Hezbollah would be significantly less challenging than the Gaza conflict, primarily due to Lebanon's rugged terrain making it nearly impossible to hide effectively. Many individuals tend to overestimate Hezbollah and its capabilities.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

are you aware that Israel air-force consist of these strike planes
84x f15 A/C
25 F15I
175 F16-c/i
39x f35
48x AH-64

and add to that inventory of Israel drone

1/4th to 1/2 of Israel air force is 45 to 90 F-16 + 27 to 54 F-15 + 12 to 24 AH-64
Gaza Strip is 40km long and 6-12 km wide so please stop post nonsense . there is not enough space to operate more airplane otherwise they have done it.
the amount of bomb dropped on Gaza is near 40-50kton of bombs
 
Last edited:
Extremely flawed logic. Why would Pakistan help the Persians? If we follow your logic, we could also include other Gulf countries. Do you believe Saudi Arabia would assist Iran? Or that the United Arab Emirates would support Iran? Why and on what grounds?

I think it mainly reflects your desires and dreams of some unity among Muslims which in the real world doesn't exist. It's like me saying all Christians will unite because someone attacked Brazil, lol. Such thoughts are only entertained by religious fanatics.

Underground air bases are useless, especially if you have Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bombs in your arsenal that can easily penetrate underground military facilities. By the way this is one such underground air base.

View attachment 9507
View attachment 9508
What do you think Israel or the US would do in this case? Think...
Israel , probably nothing otherwise they didn't try to pull USA to a war with Iran
 



first strike option baby!

The effectiveness of a first strike is contingent upon the aggressor's ability to deplete its enemy's retaliatory capacity immediately to a level that would make a second strike impossible, mitigable, or strategically undesirable.

Israel together with the US, would use the 'first-strike option' launching an attack to erase 85% of all Iranian capabilities.

Anyways gotta go to the gym for a workout. Give some thought to what I've said. So far, yall provided weak counterarguments.
Look at the title - and look where you are. Last warning - i respectively ask you to stick to the topic or I will thread ban you again.
Now either post your dreams of Iran on a separate thread and analyse it by yourself or remain on topic on this thread…..
 
Underground air bases are useless, especially if you have Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bombs in your arsenal that can easily penetrate underground military facilities. By the way this is one such underground air base.
stay on topic
 
How can you so balantly put all the blame on israel on innocent killings in gaza what is the evidence for that??
What if hamas is using human shields against israel and causing innocent deaths??
Wait for all the evidences .
What kind of evidence? Babies heads chopped off? Please stop being so childish. The evidence provided historically by Israel has not been the complete truth - always selective.
Where in my posts have I ever supported or defended Hamas?
I don’t need any evidence showing us whose to blame and not to blame. The dead innocent bodies in hospitals and refugee camps of innocent children speak volumes.
Even the foreign secretary of the UK has said today - Israel is guilty of war crimes etc - now that’s the tide turning…..
 




Look at the title - and look where you are. Last warning - i respectively ask you to stick to the topic or I will thread ban you again.
Now either post your dreams of Iran on a separate thread and analyse it by yourself or remain on topic on this thread…..
What's not clear to you? A user asked me about Iran and I responded. If he hadn't asked I wouldn't have talked about it. This is the second time you've threatened me you did it to another user before. If you prohibit me from commenting in this thread I'll contact the owner of this forum.

At least I provide thoughtful comments and respond to questions seriously while others constantly post one-liners. You've been threatening me from the beginning do you really think your threats can intimidate me?

I save every comment because I know your intentions from the start. Stop threatening users no one is afraid of you or your badge. Be honest, and there won't be any issues. Show me a comment that you find objectionable.

Every day at least 20% of the comments are at least partially off-topic and you don't threaten anyone else like you do to me.

And you've been doing this since the first day you became a moderator, literally! Stop with the threats!

@Truth @samejjangir
 
Last edited:
What's not clear to you? A user asked me about Iran and I responded. If he hadn't asked I wouldn't have talked about it. This is the second time you've threatened me you did it to another user before. If you prohibit me from commenting in this thread I'll contact the owner of this forum.

At least I provide thoughtful comments and respond to questions seriously while others constantly post one-liners. You've been threatening me from the beginning do you really think your threats can intimidate me?

I save every comment because I know your intentions from the start. Stop threatening users no one is afraid of you or your badge. Be honest, and there won't be any issues. Show me a comment that you find objectionable.

Every day at least 20% of the comments are at least partially off-topic and you don't threaten anyone else like you do to me.

And you've been doing this since the first day you became a moderator, literally! Stop with the threats!
How is this post related to the topic in question yet again? Stop being off topic. You have a problem with me please take it to management but stay on topic. I will leave this one up to show how off topic you are consistently
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
And how would you generate hundreds of sorties, you forget Iran will carry out saturation attacks on all IDF air bases.

Iran doesn't need to do anything directly. The militias in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen provide the 'plausible deniability' to Iran--with a 'cover' to not be 'involved'--and thus Americans don't have to engage directly against Iran--leaving the tiny little puppy Israel fend for itself while hated by EVERYONE in that region and with a creeping naval blockade.
I am still intrigued by the American carrier moving away from the eastern Med. Sea... A subtle message to Israel to dial down or some diabolical ploy to let the regional players take the bait and start a regional war which suits Israel.
 
In this part of the video, the great diplomat Alastair Crooke starts talking about the Israel-Palestine conflict. His position is different from Prof. Sachs: Crooke is saying that, due to Biden's own pro Zionist leaning, America is only doing lip service about limiting the conflict but otherwise wouldn't mind a regional conflict. Interesting take!
When you compare Israel and US's comments about/in relation to the war and regional tensions from it, you notice they are not in line with Israel's actions- for ex., we were told that US apparently told Israel not to "provoke" Hezbollah too much because it needs time to prepare for a potential regional conflagration, so if this is true, why did Israel still go ahead and kill Al-Arouri and Wasssim the HEzbollah commander of Southern LEbanon? US didnt complain about it publicly, so i agree with Alastair Cooke on this.

Also- its obvious ISrael has started its active campaign to assisinate top resistance commanders and leadership, the war and its risk of expanding are obviously increasing.
 
When you compare Israel and US's comments about/in relation to the war and regional tensions from it, you notice they are not in line with Israel's actions- for ex., we were told that US apparently told Israel not to "provoke" Hezbollah too much because it needs time to prepare for a potential regional conflagration, so if this is true, why did Israel still go ahead and kill Al-Arouri and Wasssim the HEzbollah commander of Southern LEbanon? US didnt complain about it publicly, so i agree with Alastair Cooke on this.

I am not sure what's the real American position. Prof. Sachs, Prof. Mearsheimer, Col. Larry C. Johnson and Alastair Crooke --all very very respectable in my eyes--are providing slightly different narrative. But all agree that it is only Israelis which want a regional war. But is America onboard for that?? That's where they disagree.
As to the bolded part... I think America is almost certainly much more harsh in private to the Israelis than in public. One of the esteemed analysts even said that Lloyd Austin was blunt with Israelis, telling them that if Israel continues with the Gaza assault and/or attacking Hezbollah then Israel is going to face a 'strategic defeat'. And, considering Israel's tiny size, population size, hostile neighborhood, dual nationalities/option to flee to Europe, a pampered, soft population, a 'strategic defeat' is not like most other countries' similar defeats--it would mean an end of Israel itself as we know it.
 
Israel's 'strategic defeat' in this conflict is not going to be similar to something like Pakistan faced against India in 1971, leading to the formation of Bangladesh, or the formation of South Sudan from Sudan, or East Timor from Indonesia or the various countries formed out of Yugoslavia. All those parent/original countries still stand, albeit in reduced / different ways. Israel will be drastically different in case of a strategic loss, if it would even exist, for the reasons I had given above.
 
A shocked Palestinian boy convulses after suffering an anxiety attack due to the constant bombing of his home by Zionist warplanes in southern Gaza.

This is the terror that the Zionists instill in Palestinian civilian families every day in Gaza.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top