Israel’s Genocide in Gaza | 2023- till present

Status
Not open for further replies.
So what is superior intellect combined with a declining political and military power looks like ?

When the Mongols conquered Persia in the thirteenth century, theywere themselves entirely uneducated andwere obliged to depend wholly on nativePersian officials to administer the countryand to collect the revenue. They retained aswazeer, or Prime Minister, one Rashid alDin, a historian of international repute.
the Prime Minister, when speaking to theMongol II Khan, was obliged to remainthroughout the interview on his knees. Atstate banquets, the Prime Minister stoodbehind the Khan’s seat to wait upon him. Ifthe Khan were in a good mood, heoccasionally passed his wazeer a piece offood over his shoulder.
So it doesn't matter if the West continues to print more nobel leaurate every year or how many top universities are located in the West. The moment their military and political power decline relative to their opponents, or even worse collapses. These intellectuals, just like the Persian intellectuals under the Mongols, will be to the use of the new conquering race (which are mostly backward).

So just how far has the West declines ?
The high point of the West should be considered the Belle Epoch


The Belle Epoque coincided with what people call the great divergence, the socioeconomic phenomena where the White race eclipsed everyone and anyone on earth including past mighty states (Ottomans, India, China).

480px-Maddison_GDP_per_capita_1500-1950.svg.png


This is the time where Europeans could just walk into Qing's capital city and divided the city into neighborhoods for whites.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


or even put humans in zoo.


This is the high time of the Western civilizations.

But WW1 came .The result ? 3 mighty christian European empires cease to exist, in their place, small nation states (Russian empire, German and Austrian empire broken up to form the likes of Czechia, Ukraine, Poland etc.)

WW2 follows up, and Europe lose almost their entire sovereignty and a huge chunk of their people and industry in the process. Germany no longer a proud militaristic society, now divided into two, they're still and economic and intellectual power, but again they have lost the political and military power (reminds you of the Arabo-Persians in the 13th century).

Then what's left in Europe is the UK and France, and they only figured out they no longer pulls the string during the Suez crisis (1956). Where they fail to subdue newly independent Egypt. Other colonial power like the Netherlands caved to former colony Indonesia in the contest for Papua, while Portuguese lose Goa to India.

It would took another 40 years before Britain accepts the fate that they're no longer an empire with the handover of Hong Long to Communist China in 1999.

Hong-Kong-Handover1.jpg


They try another war in the Middle East but even that they fail. Afghanistan falls back to taliban rule in 2021, while the war in the Middle East resulted in the return of Islamism, even though the Americans engineered war in these region to introduce liberal democracy.

If Suez in 1956 is humiliating enough for the French and the UK, for failing to perform against newly independent Egypt. Then 2024 saw the combined West failed to compel Houthis to open the Red Sea, and the Houthis aren't even a nation state, but an armed group hailing from the mountains of Yemen.

So we're already the relative decline in capacity of the West to impose their will using the political and military tools. It will continue to decline, I guess the upcoming war in the Pacific with China will be the main blow to the West's ability to shape the world to their whims.

So be patient. Soon enough, the host in which parasites like Israel land on will be subdued by time.

@Meengla @LeGenD

Thanks for tagging me. My response will be strictly neutral and not aimed to judge any party morally.

Western powers fought and destroyed each other.

The first blow to the British Empire came from the American Revolution in the (1763 - 1783) period. The British Empire also had enemies in Europe that sought to weaken it such as France and Germany and created war on a scale never seen before.

The US stem from American Revolution and wanted to expand its lands. The US destroyed the Mexican Empire in the (1846 - 1848) period, and delivered a major blow to the Spanish Empire in 1898. The US also created a coalition of Western powers to defeat Germany in World War Two. The British Empire lost its military strength and ability to hold foreign lands in World War Two and the US took its place to unite and rebuild the West.

The US made it possible for the Soviet Union to overwhelm Third Reich from the East in World War Two but the two became rivals in subsequent years and were locked in a struggle to create a suitable World Order in Cold War that latest 43 years with following outcomes: (1) US-led forces preserved South Korea in the Korean War (1950 - 1953); (2) The Soviet Union abandoned Cuba in 1962; (3) The US abandoned South Vietnam in 1972; (4) The Soviet Union abandoned Afghanistan in 1988; (5) US-led forces preserved Kuwait in the Persian Gulf War (1991); and the US managed to split the Soviet Union via Color Revolution in a remarkable American strategic victory in 1991.

The US became the sole superpower of the world in 1991 but 9/11 in 2001 disclosed a new reality - the rise of powerful non-state actors (NSA) in Islamic countries that sought to challenge the US and its allies in the Pan-Islamic World. Enter War On Terror.

The US deemed Al-Qaeda Network responsible for 9/11 and struck its networks in a number of countries such as Afghanistan [related information in here, here, here, here, here and here], Iraq [related information in here], Somalia [related information in here], Pakistan [related information in here and here], Yemen [related information in here and here], and Libya [related information in here] in a prolonged conflict [see photo below]. Interestingly, Trump accepted Taliban's deal to conclude the war in Afghanistan in Doha Accords in 2020 in line with Pakistan's regional interests [related information in here, here, here, here, here, and here]. Taliban recovered and returned to power in Afghanistan consequently.

But US-led forces dismantled Saddam regime to reshape political landscape of Iraq in the (2003 - 2011) period [related information in here and here] followed by Qaddafi regime to reshape political landscape of Libya in 2011 [related information in here, here, and here]. US-led forces also fought to dismantle the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (ISIL) across Iraq and Syria in recent years [related information in here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here].

War On Terror casualties.png

The US can use advanced technology to conduct operations with surgical precision and defeat opposing forces in different regions but these outcomes do not necessarily lead to stability in volatile regions. This is apparent in Iraq, Libya, and Syria as Iran found a way to create a powerful Axis of Resistance comprising Houthi in Yemen, Special Groups in Iraq, Hezbollah in Syria, Hamas in Gaza, and Hezbollah in Lebanon. This shows how much religio-political sway Iran has in the region.

Houthi toppled Saleh adminstration of Yemen in 2014 and prevented a Saudi-led coalition from restoring Saleh administration to power in Yemen in recent years [related information in here, here, here, here, and here].

Hamas and Hezbollah are locked in a prolonged conflict with Israel since 2006. This conflict has left Gaza in ruins [related information in here, here, and here], and Israel is also attacking Hezbollah positions in Syria [related information in here, here, here, here, and here] and also in Lebanon. Houthi in Yemen and Special Groups in Iraq are also taking their chances with Israel but have limited reach in this matter.

Biden is old and have no energy. He is not interested in degrading the Axis of Resistance in the Middle East. He allow proportional responses to attacks on American troops and ships in the Middle East at most. This is what you see in the present.

Netanyahu's refusal to accept Two-state solution has undermined Israel's reputation in recent years. The US might be holding back due to this factor.

There is another angle to these developments. The US does not want any country to rule the Middle East. The US has War Profiteering considerations in fact. The statusquo continues.

These developments also show that an NSA can be well-funded, well-equipped, and well-prepared for war and can influence regional geopolitics in profound ways. Proliferation of sophisticated weapons and parts and focus on studying the art of war can make things possible.

However, I wonder about the future of the Middle East. The Euphrates River is drying up as foretold in hadith. This development might set the stage of a devastating war in the region. The intensity of this war will be such that 99 out of 100 participants will die in it.

"Ninety-nine out of one hundred will die (in the fighting) and every man amongst them will say: 'Perhaps I may be the only one to remain alive."

I see over-confidence and arrogance in regional powers and relevant discussions. Every side assumes that it will prevail. There is gross underestimation of capabilities of the other side and less focus on how to settle problems in sensible ways. Tragedy awaits as Allah Almighty dislike corruption and arrogance.

Now what is the future of the US? Some claim that the US is in decline but this is not a new claim but a frequently repeated claim. Subjective judgement is a common theme, my friend. The US is a land of immigrants and can adjust and reshape its policies in view of global developments, this is apparent in American history. I don't think that the US has lost its military strength and ability to hold foreign lands but it does not apply its power in a big way in every conflict, there is no need to. American leaders have not considered the Pacific War template in regional conflicts around the world. It will be interesting to see how the US will fight a well-armed country, if necessary.
 
Last edited:
Hezbollah reveals for the first time the features and capabilities of the Qadir 1 missile

The Qadir 1 ballistic missile was used this Wednesday morning in an operation targeting the Mossad headquarters in the suburbs of Tel Aviv, which is the headquarters responsible for assassinating leaders and detonating pagers and radios.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Most people now get their news from independent media.

Zionists control corporate media NOT independent media.

Most people now get their news from places like this:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Jake Tapper and Dana are part of the club
 
Israel's ABM inventory, which receives unlimited supplies from the US and EU, is unlimited and will never be depleted.
Expensive ballistic missiles have little effect and must be overwhelmed by launching as many rockets and drones as possible from bordering Lebanon into populated areas.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


He's done for

We know yous not Chinese. No Chinese here talkin ta you no? Yous way outta your depth here. You need to admit your Bangladeshi credentials.

Thank you.
 
We know yous not Chinese. No Chinese here talkin ta you no? Yous way outta your depth here. You need to admit your Bangladeshi credentials.

Thank you.
🤣 I dont speak Bengali. U are funny what are u ? Iranian? Egyptian? Lebanese? I don't know how u come up with me being Bangladeshi u smooth 🧠 what are u gonna accuse me next?an afghan taliban pashtun??? Lol
 
CNN: American officials hope to announce tonight a framework for a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon

@AsharqNewsBrk
Americans the biggest warmongers are working on ceasefire???? while at the same time supplying and supporting Israel with billions $ and weapons of mass destructions which they use indiscriminately killing Palestinians and Lebanese women and children mostly.
I personally hope that Hezbollah continues to hit Israel really hard to least settle the score.

Americans may also seek to divide Lebanon to say that it’s Hezbollah at fault and not the Lebanon.Israel is fighting Hezbollah and not Lebanon and it’s people.

American have shameless foreign policies they couldn’t care about human rights when it suits them.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



Unique view of Chinese , their Citizen (researcher) with Israel never seen this view point before

The part about Israelis paying slave salary to Thailand people and claiming they have perfect communism in country , quite hilarious to hear , they got exposed by the Chinese researcher

This inner working of their society can only be experienced by None Muslim , as they often keep their inner stuff well hidden
 
Washington trying to , re-supply Israel with more bombs that is why they need the 4 extra week

a) Either move more war ships in regions
b) Resupply Israel with more SAM missiles which have clearly run out
Do not trust the the American as they themselves occupy the land of others.
 
Only time will tell what Democrats would do. I am well aware of the AIPAC control over both parties but I also think the Democratic cadres is slowly, but surely, moving away from Israel while the Republicans are much more in embrace of Israel. As a corollary to that: It is a fallacy to think that in a democracy like America things would stay the same. Just recently in your own country, the UK, electoral politics partly influenced by the demographics and Israel-Palestine conflict gave rise to the Labor after decades of the Tory control and the Labor is slightly less pro Israel--they may even arrest Netanyahu if there is some binding ICJ ruling.
I have been following the chatter both here in America and in Israel about the Nov. elections in America and there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Israelis are wary of a Harris' Presidency. She is very much constrained by the AIPAC till the elections but IF she wins then I am nearly-certain she's going to be more fair then Trump would be.
There's a saying ! Americans always do the right thing after they exhaust all other options .
 
Wow, only 2-4 weeks of fighting Hezbollah (and apparently destroying it and many people and children in Lebanon through the mass pager attacks) and Israel and US have both first mentioned the word "CEASEFIRE".

They use all kinds of other words to make it look like they dont want it, but they do, because they are the first to mention the word "ceasefire" in the conflict against Hezbollah. Has Israel already taken that much damage from Hezbollah that it has to offer a ceasefire masking as a "framework for stopping the violence"(or wtf the US embassy said or worded it as)??
Kill ratio of 1000 gazan and hezbulla killed versus 1 Israeli killed , are you declaring victory ?
 
As long as your "side" of the narrative is: "kill all the Jews!", the world will not buy your legitimacy. At its heart, that is your side's narrative. Hence the Jews will fight until their deaths. Of course, a lot of "martyrs" on your side will join them in this process.

Our narrative is "kill anyone who takes my house and kills my family". If that person happens to be Jewish, then that doesn't get them off the hook. The narrative would apply if the abuser were Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, atheist, or even another Muslim.

The fact remains that Jews have so completely brainwashed the Western psyche with their victimhood narrative (some of it justified, as in the Holocaust) that normal rules don't apply to them any more. If someone robs a bank or commits a crime, we don't shy away from calling them a criminal just because they are Jewish, but most Western people would be scared to do just that.

In this case, we have a military colonialist entity founded on the principles of racial and religious superiority. If anyone else did that, they would be called out but, since these racial supremacists are Jewish, we can't call a spade a spade.

The pager attacks are another example. They are clearly a war crime (aka terrorism) because the trigger was pulled indiscriminately. The person holding the pager could have been someone's child, a reservist noncombatant, or even someone flying a plane or driving a bus at the time. If a Muslim had done this, the Western media would be calling it terrorism but, since Israel did it, it is being glorified as a James Bond style masterstroke.
 
Our narrative is "kill anyone who takes my house and kills my family".
This is a false narrative. The 1948 Israelis did that to very few local Muslim Arabs, probably no more than the reverse was done. That narrative does not explain Iranian, Yemeni, and Lebanese attacks on Israelis. The only thing that explains what is going on is that Shia powers are using Palestinian grievances in an attempt to gain prestige in the Muslim consciousness, in hopes of dominating Saudi Arabia and other Sunni societies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top