Meengla
Elite Member
Assad was indeed a 'liability': A minority rule over majority but from what I have seen, the Christians in Syria trusted him more than they trusted what's coming. Tells you something. Alastair Crooke saying when the rebels controlled Idlib, they shown great brutality and primitive behavior which is a hallmark of ISIS. Are we going to see a repeat of that in Syria? I hope not then otherwise people, like in Iraq, would start to see that it is the Assads and Saddams and the Qaddafis which are needed to stabilize some countries until they march into the next stage of human awareness and political understanding.As for Syria, part of me is also just glad that Assad is finally desposed of. In the retrospective lens, Assad was a major liability. Partly because he and his generals were inept, incompetent and corrupt.
I know some may not believe this but he was also a reliability on the account of him being a minority sect ruling over a majority. Iran discredited itself when they propped up his regime in the syrian war. I think mostly it was on strategic grounds, and not religious/ideological one. I know many will strongly disagree with this and thats fine. Anyway, its over and done with.
But its at least good that Iran cut their losses now and realigned with the new reality.
Who knows, maybe Iran can reenter the Syrian arena and establish a relationship with the new government and cooperate strategically in Lebanese and Panestinian arena. I doubt the other side will want to do that for the foreseeable future, but in time it could happen if Syria can pull itself together and does not descend into Libya/Sudan-style chaos. Despite everything that has transpired, we still have a common enemy. For a period we saw a unification of Shia/Sunni to combat this common enemy.
I think Iran's version of the Great Game started after 1979 is ending. It will be very interesting to watch what Turkey does, though I have low hopes...





