Jeffrey Epstein Files Part II - news and discussions

[KingQamaR]

To me it all looks and feels like watching? The old order is dying and the new world struggles to be born. Now is the time of monsters.

 

[FarhanSiddiqui]

Everyone and his dog knew what Mandelson was so how did Starmer miss it? He didn’t . He had known.

Starmer, Mandelson and Epstein were all Jewish Mossad agents. Same mission different roles.

 

[Hussain]

Lord?

He meant Lund Epstein

 

[dbc]

@Muji.Iqbal please don't spam and stop using a childish reaction emoji to mock mods. Respect is a two way street, follow the rules and respect members and mods.

 

[PakFactor]

Its utterly shameful that people are worried about their favorite leaders are in Epstein list or if they are than what are they for.

Truth is we need to ask real questions.

1. How compromised upper management is ?
2. Who is next Epstein since he is gone, Peter Thiel man of Palantir Tech.
3. Is there any other Epstein doing the dirty deeds and Epstein was not the only weapon Zionist used
4. Does this mean that we the ordinary people are experimental and sacrificial goats for them ?
5. with only limited docs revealing that much, imagine what rest of 4 million docs contain ?
6. We need to rethink how we think. The Baluchistan issue, MQM and Jeay Sindh Issue and rest of the issues that only are damaging the Pakistan and making life living hell for ordinary people.
7. Are the people that are running our countries in these pizza parties and then do their bidding keeping us in poor state ?

So many questions coming in mind. with so much compromised I dont think anyone is saint in upper hierarchy, Anyone means anyone including our favorite people if we have any.

To answer your central question: there will always be another Epstein. Every country has its own Epstein, as they can be central to keeping some gears greased and moving.

 

[PakFactor]

I know them very well

Check my wall;

 

[WildApache]

UK folks, how significant is Angela Rayner over there?

Angela Rayner leads Epstein 'cover-up' revolt against Starmer

Angela Rayner was among MPs demanding that the Intelligence and Security Committee oversees what material is released about Mandelson vetting process.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Angela Rayner , my gosh ..
Can't be surely ?

Just watched PMQS and the tory lady Kemi did well . He is defo gone

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

One thing , it shows how much better British system is to Amercas.
Starmer looks like getting booted out for this whilst Trump is actually mentioned thousands of times in the files and he just carries on.

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

@Muji.Iqbal please don't spam and stop using a childish reaction emoji to mock mods. Respect is a two way street, follow the rules and respect members and mods.

Mocking mods is a sure ticket to a time out.

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

Have you heard her talk? Listen to her talking....

With respect to your other observations

- Mandelson was instrumental in getting rid of the popular labour leader Jeremy Corbyn....he was our Bernie Sanders. A genuinely decent fellow.

- prior to that, he meddled in the affairs of Gordon Brown, a half-decent fellow however more "centrist"....

- Kier Starmer is Mandelsons invention....he was put in place to replace Corbyn in order to serve insidious interests. I won't go in those as I'll probably bore you with my "same old" shit....

Mandelson and Starmer are linked very closely. However, they'll scapegoat Mandelson....it's dog eat dog now.

Moreover, the opposition who are more politically aligned with the likes of Mandelson, Trump etc are now pretending to be appalled by this.....

Parties like Reform, who liked what Epstein did, will also pretend and use this in their own interests.

Gotcha'.

Same story repeated world over. Not surprised.

 

[Hussain]

This clip is currently the most popular in the United States, and it shows the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (Kash Patel) reading some papers and then showing signs of panic.

He appears to have been shocked by information in those papers and tried to issue secret signals to someone off camera.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

he is not panicking, he is just high on coke, I had a colleague who behaved just like him

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

he is not panicking, he is just high on coke, I had a colleague who behaved just like him

I don't know about that. Then again, not much surprises me anymore.

Other than the names of victims, would like to see some of the other redacted names unredacted. And then ask the hard questions of what was their involvement.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Dalit]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[ghazi52]

Who is in the Epstein files?​

Brandon Drenon
BBC

L-R: Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Sarah Ferguson and Ehud Barak

The list of some of the world's most rich and powerful people with ties to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has lengthened, after the US government released millions of new files from its investigation into the disgraced financier.

The latest drop of material - dubbed the Epstein files - on 30 January included three million pages, 180,000 images, 2,000 videos, and a number of household names like Richard Branson, Bill Gates and Elon Musk.

There is no suggestion that appearing in the documents implies any wrongdoing. Many people who have featured in previous releases have denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein.

The release came weeks after the deadline set by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which was signed into law by US President Donald Trump in November. It required a full release of all Epstein-related documents.

Democratic lawmakers and some Republicans say the Trump administration has still not met its obligation and is holding back additional documents.

Who is in the Epstein files?

Millions of Epstein-related documents released by the US justice department include the names of the world's rich and powerful.

www.bbc.com

 

[Psyko70]

To answer your central question: there will always be another Epstein. Every country has its own Epstein, as they can be central to keeping some gears greased and moving.

Blackmailer yes but epstein ? I dont think so. Not every country has such man who has child sacrifice activities.