Jeffrey Epstein files

Status
Not open for further replies.
Solomon2 said:

Rigid ideologies like DEI, climate dogma, and anti-Trump obsession keep collapsing under their own contradictions, leaving their loudest champions looking increasingly absurd.

By Victor Davis Hanson
Vth441YH_400x400-160x160.jpeg

November 20, 2025​

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is a euphemism for a rigid racialist theology.

It deductively postulates that a large percentage of the population is oppressed by racism and sexism, mostly by white males.

DEI makes no allowance for the class or wealth of the alleged victims or their supposed victimizers.

So once that rigid party line is set, it cannot account for tens of millions of affluent and privileged non-white Americans or like numbers of poor and non-privileged whites.

Absurdities and ridicule must then follow.

One example is the spectacle of former First Lady Michelle Obama on her current book tour.

Mrs. Obama cannot finish an interview without whining about the racism she allegedly encountered as the once most influential and powerful woman in the United States.

According to Michelle, she was not given the exemptions that other white first ladies received.

She did not get enough free stuff for the First Family.

She had to hire three stylists daily to straighten her hair to meet “white” expectations—as if also Asians and Hispanics do not have straight hair, or many whites do not have hard-to-comb curly hair.

Indeed, she now claims blacks cannot even swim because of white-induced pressures to maintain dry and straight hair.

Because her DEI creed ignores class and wealth, Michelle has no idea how absurd she sounds.

She and husband Barack Obama own three estates in addition to their former Chicago home, together valued somewhere around $40 million.

Their net worth is estimated at between $70 and $100 million. They fly private, surrounded by a throng of Secret Service guardians.

The more Michelle clings to the fossilized dogma of unchanging racial victimization, the more she becomes ridiculous or offensive.

Trump Derangement Syndrome is another rigid ideology that deductively mandates that Trump is evil and thus must be exposed as such by any means necessary.

Sometimes, such Pavlovian hatred so blinds the left to evidence that it becomes oblivious to its own suicidal choices.

Take the “Epstein files.”

For four years, the Biden administration had no desire to release any names that appeared in the thousands of the infamous Jeffrey Epstein’s emails and text messages under its control.

To the extent that Trump’s name leaked out of the files, most had agreed on the mostly innocuous circumstances of the references.

There was not just a lack of evidence that Trump was ever entrapped by the spider-like Epstein’s blackmail webs.

In fact, eventually, Trump ostracized Epstein well before he was convicted and jailed.

Had he been compromised, the Democrats—who raided the Trump home, tried to de-ballot him, and used lawfare to drag him into five different local, state, and federal courtrooms—would have released the files in a nanosecond.

So when Trump continued the prior Biden policy of keeping the files private, the left mindlessly shouted that the hated Trump must be hiding his own culpability.

They shrilly demanded that he release all the files—without a second thought about the reasons why their fellow Democrats had previously kept them private.

So a compliant but cagey Trump has begun releasing the trove of documents.

The evidence does not reveal any new Trump bombshells. Instead, there are lots of new references to the Democrats, like the former Harvard President Larry Summers.

A Democratic member of Congress, Delegate Stacey Plaskett of the U.S. Virgin Islands, is exposed in the files as a partisan, compliant tool of the predator Epstein.

In her hatred of Trump, the files show Plaskett texting for live prompts from the odious Epstein as he tutors her on how best to coax a congressional witness to demonize none other than Donald Trump.

Was there not a single cool Democratic head who could have seen where the party’s obsessions with Trump were headed?

Similarly, Democrats embrace climate-change orthodoxy—regardless of the obvious contradictions and paradoxes that follow.

Climate change religion exposes Democratic grandees like the shore-residing Obamas, the jet-setting Al Gore and John Kerry, and the multi-estate-owning Nancy Pelosi.

All fly on private jets. They heat and cool with fossil fuels their various energy-guzzling huge homes—while demanding hoi polloi turn down their air conditioners or give up their diesel pickups.

But even green guru billionaire Bill Gates has become conflicted and a climate apostate. Why?

Wind and solar “renewables” will never supply left-wing techies like Gates the additional 100 gigawatts of electrical generation per year that they need to fulfill their lucrative artificial intelligence dreams.

Nor does climate orthodoxy make allowances for vastly more U.S. oil and gas production to supply a left-wing, but energy-short Europe, or to flood the world with cheap energy to bankrupt Putin’s oil and gas exporting Russia.

The problem with a party line is that it is deductive, not inductive.

Ideology makes facts fit dogmas, rather than evidence leading empirically to conclusions.

So inflexible cults like climate-change orthodoxy, DEI, and Trump Derangement Syndrome make their adherents look utterly ridiculous.
Click to expand...
the Mossad agent is here to rescue his operatives? Stay out of this, I don't care if my very own father is on the Epstein list. I don't care if they're democrats, republicans or a one of a kind rare three eyed unicorn. We need to find these people, lock them up and purge their names and legacies from society. Sir, you are on notice to not push an agenda on this thread.If you do I will ban you from this thread.
 
Davey Crockett said:

Jasmine Crockett Shares List Of Republicans Who Took Money From Epstein - Only Problem - It Was A Different Epstein!​

View attachment 160791

Jasmine Crockett Shares List Of Republicans Who Took Money From Epstein - Only Problem - It Was A Different Epstein!<!-- --> | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com
Click to expand...
It's not a good idea to confuse Jasmine Crockett with actually being smart. She's not. She's an admitted DEI hire. If you look at her legal CV, it's nothing to brag about. If anything, it's yet another demonstration the standards for law school admission are too low.

Same with passing the Bar.
 
muhammed45 said:
This is a death knell to Israelis.

So far, Mossad had been able to impose its dictates on Trump administration through this leverage.

Trump has been abused by Israelis and looks he is running out of patience.

Agreeing on F-35 sales to KSA is an other sign of Trump being fed up with Mossad threats, despite Israeli opposition to challenging Zionist aerial dominance in the region.

KSA after normalisation with Iran, doesn't consider Iran as a threat anymore, on the contrary, they have deeply felt the Israeli threat in their northern borders after Israeli invasion of Syria.

Trump throwing Epstein files away, means not only the greater Israeli plan is under threat but also existence of Israel goes under threat also.
Click to expand...

Systems override morality! By that I mean we are predisposed to look at the goodness of heart and expectation of doing the right thing. Ones leveraged by the Systems use that as a crutch to not do the right thing.

What you're seeing is the system seeking levers to propel a discourse. Saudis are not offering balance they're offering a bridge. Ones playing cover for zion are effectively at a loss here... the way you understand a conduit or tool is by their approach. Only zion is running with an agenda and the long con! So they'll eat it all up... any space offered.
However all is not right ... way too many heads have popped out for this whack a mole to be handled simultaneously...
See how system handles
 
Davey Crockett said:
View attachment 160900
Click to expand...
Frankly, knowing just how far the government has been penetrated by adversaries, how much more damage to national security could there possibly be?

Or, is the Speaker afraid of the revolt by the people once they finally learn the truth what has been going on and covered up?
 
I used to watch this kids streams during the last election cycle a devout Trumper ..and MAGA both him an his mom. He interviewed Epstein's neighbor ....

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
dbc said:
MTG just resigned.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Do you want to know why MTG resigned from Congress?

Because she wants to run for President......
 
MTG resignation is disappointing and unexpected. She was really making waves last six months.

Any criticism of Israel is kryptonite for politician careers in America.
 
The Epstein files—the government’s data and physical evidence related to the Epstein investigation—have everyone all fired up, including Epstein’s brother, Mark. On Tuesday, right before the House and Senate passed a bill to compel the Department of Justice to release the cache, Mark Epstein claimed in an interview with NewsNation that the head of the FBI, Kash Patel, was leading a “coverup” of the Epstein files. He added that a “pretty good source” told him the files were being scrubbed of any “Republican names” in “Winchester”—the Virginia city where the FBI’s main records-processing facility is located.

There’s no evidence to back up any of Mark Epstein’s allegations. But his remarks were shared in a Reddit post that day that led a handful of commenters to suggest if the files are being sanitized then perhaps people should protest outside of the bureau’s Winchester building, known as the Central Records Complex, where the Epstein files were processed earlier this year and are stored. Another commenter asked “at what point do we go from protesting to the next logical progression?” Elsewhere on social media, some people suggested that they should go and get the Epstein files themselves.
According to two people familiar with the FBI’s operations who requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak with the media, the bureau interpreted the comments as potentially threatening and took action. The FBI sent its uniformed police officers to the Central Records Complex to guard the facility. The officers, who normally patrol the FBI’s headquarters in Washington, were also assigned to protect top officials and staff at the Virginia facility, the people familiar said.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top