My reply was strictly in context of those 130 odd fighters that needs to be replaced and crux of my argument is PAF can retire all these with induciton of fewer number of more high tech fighters (as you originally said that we don't need to replace them one-on-one basis) to which I agreed consider current situation but pointed out the need of maintaining a balance of power for future. Now you read too much into it. I never points out any timeframe but just to clarify I was talking about post 2030 scenaio. 40 J-10C and 36 J-35 would be indeed a great power boost but tell me one thing objectively. While IAF has signed deal for 114 Rafale, has PAF signed a deal for either these J-10Cs and J-35 as of now? Has any PAF official gave a statement confirming any such plan? So no officially confirmed, government approved acquistion plan. It's all chatter right now or proposal at best. I will certainly believe PAF's acquistion plan when I will see one. I will factor both in my discussion when there will be a confirmed formal deal with clear timeline of induction. Plus, IAF is already worried about sqn strength and once they do that (even with Tejas) that will be time for PAF to worry about because even with lower squadron strength IAF has numerical advantage which is to increase further if IAF just meet its sanctioned sqd strength without increasing their number. Now, I know this is not going to happen tomorrow or in 2028. PAF is comfortable position till 2030 even with current inventory but that scenario will begin to change rapidly once IAF will begin induction of both Rafale and Tejas MK2. (I don't consider Tejas MK1A a very credible threat). That's all I was pointing out. Peace.