Joint Defense Agreement: Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, news & updates

That this agreement poses a threat to Israel and that we will not permit it?
Do you really think so ? that Turkey poses a threat to israel?

historically the only nation that posed threat on israel among the 3 is just pakistan when they sent some of their pilots to Egypt during 1973 and before it.

Saudia (was) a threat during Faisal era until he was assassinated and now Saudia just pays yearly bribe to the U.S ( trillions) for protection of Al-Saud throne.

what Turkey has done ? absolutely nothing.
 
Perhaps with Saudi funding they can help fund projects for Turkiye and Pakistan that will enable them to produce more deadly advanced weapons systems that can help all 3 nations become major global military powers in the future?
The West/NATO has become Türkiye's largest customer of defence products.

chart.png


Due to this trend, a majority of Turkish firms have established production facilities and manufacturing plants in Western countries. This serves as strong evidence of the quality of our products, I think.

This trend can only be reversed if the Saudis demonstrate genuine ambition and encourage Turkish companies to invest in Saudi Arabia by injecting billions of USD into the Turkish Military-Industrial Complex.

I have my doubts and hope tge Saudis surprise me because historically, Riyadh doesn't commit but rather buys security from other countries.
 
Saudi will try to bring in jordan and egypt down the line. Turkey will try to bring in azerbaijan and Syria. After that it could expand into North Africa like Algeria.
Won't matter unless Iran joins in which I anticipate will eventually happen, likely in a couple years.
 
Devils lie in the details. And, the details are chalked out by the folks like the Pak Chief (a former ISI and MI head), Turkish FM ( a former intelligence chief), Turkish intelligence chief (a former professor of Islamic theology) etc.....

Hence, the Bharati NSA Doval isn't the only "Devil" in the town. The stick of Hazret-i Musa (PBUH) turned into a bigger snake to gobble up the Pharaoh's delusional snakes. Similarly, these bigger intellectual "Devils" have turned the table down for that uncouth and dirty smaller terrorist Devil immersed deep into delusion of grandeur....
 
What is the reason behind the frequent quoting of this Tweet? What do you anticipate him to express publicly? That this agreement poses a threat to Israel and that we will not permit it? Ofc, given that all three nations have formal ties to the US in various capacities, he will argue that this alliance serves the best interests of the US. He has no alternative but to publicly support this agreement.

Time will tell what the US really thinks of this pact.

The only way to effectively gauge the thinking is to see what the FDD and others from the neocom lobby think.

I haven't seen anything yet, but from the Israelis on twitter they are looking at it with hostility, so no doubt the neocon lobby will think similarly.
 
Saudi will try to bring in jordan and egypt down the line. Turkey will try to bring in azerbaijan and Syria. After that it could expand into North Africa like Algeria.

Azerbaijan is not going to join this deal. Syria maybe but even Syria is unlikely for now. Egypt is the next likeliest, it really was surprising that they weren't initially included considering meetings were happening in a quadrilateral format.
 
Do you really think so ? that Turkey poses a threat to israel?

historically the only nation that posed threat on israel among the 3 is just pakistan when they sent some of their pilots to Egypt during 1973 and before it.

Saudia (was) a threat during Faisal era until he was assassinated and now Saudia just pays yearly bribe to the U.S ( trillions) for protection of Al-Saud throne.

what Turkey has done ? absolutely nothing.

The zionist entity says Turkey poses a threat and a challenge to it and outlines it as such, so by that basis alone its a threat.

History is irrelevant. No point in discussing Nasser and whatnot, when Egyptian military officers are stationed in Tel aviv.



 
The zionist entity says Turkey poses a threat and a challenge to it and outlines it as such, so by that basis alone its a threat.

History is irrelevant. No point in discussing Nasser and whatnot, when Egyptian military officers are stationed in Tel aviv.



So let's remove history just because you say so ? let's say it's irrelevant .. alright.

Egypt hasn't fought israel 6 times , Pakistan hasn't participated with its pilots in 1973 against israel , Faisal didn't cut off oil to help Egypt in 1973 etc etc.

but somehow , mighty turkey poses a threat to israel because the zionist entity SAYS SO.

ok good argument bro.
 
Okay man, chill the f#*k out.

You've been posting like a mad man for someone that doesn't really care about this alliance.

Question is, would that of actually been your stance had Egypt been part of it...?


I'm chilled , you are the one who needs to calm.
people posting about Egypt and I reply them , I didn't speak about any other country.

and about your question , ya , i would actually reject Egypt being part of it , we are no mercenaries to al-saud.

Well, @Desert bro, with same logic you are "mercenary" to al-emirates.


Did Pakistan or Turkey took any single 'mercenary action' yet? If we were truly mercenaries then we literally had so many instances where we should have joined war against Iranians or houthis. But we are NOT mercenaries and the alliance is NOT called mercenaries. Do you call same to the NATO too?

and BTW, we even mediated instead becoming a party to the war. We wanted peace to prevail between Iran/its proxies and arabs. On other hand Egpyt deployed fighter jets at height of attacks. This is the reason you are not part of alliance. Because you have already chosen a side. Egypt don't have permission from uae to join this pact.

Block-1: KSA, Turkey, Pakistan, (Qatar maybe too in future)
Block-2: Greece, Israel, India, UAE

If you look honestly then Egypt is much more aligned to block-2.

I hope & Pray that KSA and UAE relations go back to strong relations as they were. They ditch Israel and so Egypt and UAE becomes closer to block-1. But my wishes are different than reality (so far).
 
Well, @Desert bro, with same logic you are "mercenary" to al-emirates.

Bro, i've really answered that thing about the Egyptian rafales many times.
YES SISI is a UAE puppet , no doubt about that. but the rafales aren't there anymore.
 
The level of dysfunction amongst Muslims is really sad to see guys.

Please refer to the good book.

It's literally telling us what to do.

Yet we refuse to follow.

This Sunni-Shia. Arab, Persian, Turk, Desi stuff needs to stop.

The other side sees you all as the enemy.

Full stop.

The quicker we realize this the better off the Ummah will be.

Anyways, this agreement is a good start God willing.
 
Before people get carried away with this latest "Muslim Nato".

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


I didn't get it?
You really want that escalation?
You think Houthis cannot be defeated?

It'd be better if this is contained and not escalated. It is a humanitarian crisis that will only perpetuate further. Houthis have a constituency, the area holds the plurality of Yemeni population. There are similar issues impacting Pakistan, though not on this intensity... both with Afghanistan and internally. Turkiye managed both Kurds for decades inside and Syria... ideally Pakistan would have been better served with having shall we say a pliant regime in Afghanistan. The regional security architecture has not been fully established... as it is in North America or Europe... the Ukraine quagmire is a cultivated insecurity after the fall of Soviets to push the empire to the borders of Russia and beyond. Similarly, zion and India push their paths of instability to further their causes. India follows Chanakyaniti and zion playing it's own long con.

Therefore, it is prudent to solve the instabilities by reaching solutions that recognize due rights... provide safe space where due, shield some and push back against unfounded exaggeration. There is no good in perpetuating this conflict...
 
Perhaps with Saudi funding they can help fund projects for Turkiye and Pakistan that will enable them to produce more deadly advanced weapons systems that can help all 3 nations become major global military powers in the future?
The idea only works once the Arab world drops this old ego that they “lead” anything. For decades they genuinely saw themselves as above non‑Arab Muslims and almost equal to Western powers — until Iran shattered that illusion and Pan‑Arabism collapsed. That’s the part people always forget.

If they’re serious about any trilateral defence axis, they’d have to invest heavily into Turkish and Pakistani defence industries. Otherwise, why would anyone die for them? Especially when the likely scenario is the West quietly backing Iran or Israel to drag the region into another Muslim‑on‑Muslim conflict.

Let’s see how this unfolds, but the days of Arabs assuming automatic leadership are over. Any future alignment only works if they recognise that reality first.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top