Master Chief
Trusted Member
Sir, as always, I do love your hussle, but this idiom has left me with more questions than answers.you bite what you chew!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sir, as always, I do love your hussle, but this idiom has left me with more questions than answers.you bite what you chew!
Sir, as always, I do love your hussle, but this idiom has left me with more questions than answers.
You would be crying if a couple of bombs fell that close to Karbala...
Here comes the self-victimization.dude, Karbala has been bombed quite a few times!
BTW, I'd crying if any bombs go near Madina...or Makkah or Jaddah or any civilian area
seems, very hard for you to do the same!
Here comes the self-victimization.
you idiot I posted the pic with caption that its too close to Medina, it was you who started with bite and chew statements, shows the double face hypocrisy of the sect you belong unfortunately, now shooo and go cry or beat your chest somewhere else.right! show 'satellite' image of a military target with a black smoke, near a holy city!
and when told that target was not the holy city, far or near does not matter (which should not be question as, it is a satellite image, which can shorten large distances!)
and you end up being called for 'self victimization'!
are you retarded ?!
you idiot I posted the pic with caption that its too close to Medina, it was you who started with bite and chew statements, shows the double face hypocrisy of the sect you belong unfortunately, now shooo and go cry or beat your chest somewhere else.
My apologies. I get it now. A good one! It's the way you say things sometimes that makes me wonder if I even understand you correctly. Carry on.Have you ever seen an animal take a bite and then struggle to chew it because the bite was bigger than its mouth?
unlike Anaconda, which can take in prey larger than the size of its mouth, dog or cat, can make a bite, bigger than the mouth (bec. of greed)
And whether or not its true for anyone you quote here - that is the real problem.You would be crying if a couple of bombs fell that close to Karbala...
Bombs have not only fallen close to Karbala and Najaf multiple times since the American attack on Iraq in 2003 , even important mosques have been blown up by Alqaeda in Iraq and ISIS several times in the 2000s and 2010s. Why do you think all these militias for self defense exist in Iraq ??You would be crying if a couple of bombs fell that close to Karbala...
Mulk kai khilaf aur Establishment kai khilaf do mukhtalif cheezain hain.bhai ye bachgana harkat ha. mujhy ye pasand nahn k aik mulk jang main ha us k khilaf memes banaun . apni ego thandi karne k liye ..han but dukh hota ha jab apne bhi sath mil k wah wah karty hain apne mulk k khilaf material dekh k .
Ibn Saud was literally on the payrolls of the British and was instrumental in the destruction of the Khilafat. In fact, he won Arabia by outdoing the Hashmites in their loyalty to the British.Incorrect.
House of Saud, with military campaigns & partnerships unified all that land which is called KSA today in 1930s. This whole territory was divided, independently ruled by small tribes. The whole land was vulnerable and open to be attacked by any power. Imagine if House of Saud would not have succeeded, Islam's holiest sites would be among various tribes. Most likely it would be actual territory of Zionists or Americans instead just being allegedly "influenced" by them.
I see lot of unjust criticism on KSA mostly by people who have sectarian hatreds built into them. They can't even see that what else would have been the greatest opportunity for KSA to openly join the war. They decided not to participate with their own airforce and own money in this war (except some american controlled and american operated bases, for which they have no authority over). KSA didn't go into war against Iran despite MASSIVE pressure by the US. The dead Lindsey Graham was publicly scolding KSA to join the war. So just imagine how much pressure they sustained privately.
Lastly, House of Saud has been one of the closest and sincere friends of Pakistan. We have been robbed by our own leaders but Saudis kept funding whenever state needed it. Not to mention most amount of Pakistanis work there and send money back home.
Now coming back to Israel. Think for yourself with all honesty and tell me who has final and absolute say in KSA ? Is it democracy ? Not at all. MBS is absolute monarch in KSA and no one in KSA would have been able to say a word against him if he'd have decided to go into Abraham accords. The man has resisted entire pressure of US & West and always says about Palestine before joining any accords. Trump sits besides him and tells him to join Abraham accords and he replies that first issue of Palestine needs to be resolved. So Israel always wants its all neighborhood to be divided, like what it did in Syria, a divided, broken saudi will be absolutely beneficial for Israel. However fortunately, KSA's internal security & Intelligence is top notch. One language, one sect and one culture in all of the country. Unlike other countries like ours where separatism can be fueled based on ethnicity. So KSA is firmly united today.
Now you guys who out of sectarian hatreds always cry against Arabs and God given wealth to them always find lame excuses. What do you expect Saudis to do ? They are a small population country. They have small military, they are not a super power. They have to keep things balanced, they are also making partnerships and relationships with Russia and China. They have to carefully maneuver. In contrast, what us Pakistan has done for Gaza or for anything else?
Hillariously, I even see some people saying that KSA was a british project LOL!... even though it was military / strategic genius of house of saud to unify all the territories. Yes they were smart and make friendship with britishers. Britishers also sensed that they are most powerful tribe on rise, so be their friends. It was largely local arab movement. It wasn't a "british project". Infact Division of India is mostly acknowledged everywhere as "Project of britishers". Britishers felt that united india could become a great power and threat to west. So we should understand that its too easy to throw accusations. People can accuse things the way they think, not neccessarily those are true.