Hinduism is a disgusting vulgar cheap culture,
Millions of people dumped it, move on, why are you obsessed about this
We couldn't care less about Hinduism
Call Hinduism “disgusting, vulgar, cheap” all you want. The record of the Indian subcontinent itself exposes that claim as empty noise.
Look at the actual condition of those who left it. In the same land, under the same climate, the same historical pressures, and with the same human material, communities that abandoned Hinduism en masse did not produce superior societies. On the metrics that matter—social cohesion, institutional continuity, gender balance, economic dynamism, and civilizational output—the results are often inferior, not superior. If dumping Hinduism were the great liberation you claim, the evidence on the ground would show it. It does not. That is the uncomfortable fact you keep dodging.
Hinduism is not some cheap imported cult. It is a civilizational operating system—scientific in its observation of nature, adaptive in its social structures, and tailored over millennia to the specific ecology, demography, and complexity of the Indian subcontinent. It integrated astronomy, medicine, mathematics, ethics, and social organization without needing a single prophet, a closed book, or a mandate to conquer. That is not “vulgar.” That is high-order civilizational engineering.
Millions left it. So what? People have abandoned every tradition under conquest, pressure, or incentive. Volume of exit is not proof of superiority of what replaced it. The real test is results. And the results in the subcontinent itself do not flatter the leavers.
You say you “couldn’t care less.” Fine. The data still does. The condition of those who left is visible. The continuity and adaptability of the system they abandoned is also visible. Mocking it does not erase either.
