Makkah Defence Alliance: Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, news & updates

Same thing applies to Iran, When KSA led Govt in power no bloodshed no war but since Iranian rabid Mullahs are in power every where is destruction and death so choice is yours.
It all started with the so-called Islamic revolution in Iran in 1979. The new sectarian rulers of Iran started exporting that revolution in many other regional countries. They started by creating their proxies, consisting of sectarian fanatics and terrorists, and provided them with all kinds of active support. As a result, the world saw states with states being created in the form of Hezbollah and Houthis. Multiple proxy groups were created in Iraq too. In countries like Pakistan, their proxies were unable to create a state within a state but they are able to cause instability in parts of the country (including GB, FATA, Balochistan, etc.)

These terrorist Irani proxies pose a serious threat to the regional security and global trade. World cannot simply over look or ignore the existence of these terrorist proxies and the threats that these proxies pose to the civilized world.
 
To me feels like things are getting blown out of proportion and reality.

Will we see PAF, TU AF bomb Yemen or send ground forces operate from Yemen highly unlikely, will they help with coordinating offensive against Houthi positions possibly. Defence of Key facilities very likely.
 
Like they united against Gaza, Lebanon. Clap Clap for the wahabi and zionist logics.
Gaza? No. The whole world was condemning Zionist war criminals, except Iran's Hindutva ally Modi's India, and terrorist Taliban.

For Lebanon, yes. Not even a single country voiced in support of a terrorist group Hezbollah. World community recognizes terrorists very well.
 
I dont know if there is a meltdown.

It seems US+Israel+Turkey+Pakistan+Saudi+Gulf-States+Greeks+British+Colombians (Blackwater) +Sudanese+Egyptians+Moroccans+Jordanians+Yemeni Mercenaries+EU operation Aspides were/are not able to defeat a bunch of poor, malnourished, sanctioned, bombed Yemenis who are fighting a 12 year blockade.

Is this considered a meltdown nowadays? I don't see pro-resistance people creating memes. It seems more that the memes are the outcome of a meltdown reaction?
There is no "defeating" a non-state entity. They will continue to operate centrally or on the fringes just as the Taliban does.

Pakistan+Turkey surely cannot be clubbed into the same league as US, Israel and EU etc. Respectfully, for you to club everyone together like this is intellectual laziness.

Pakistan and Turkey have their eye on the ball on the emerging threat. That emerging threat is not Iran or Houthis. In reality, Iran war and the conflict with Houthis has become a distraction.
 
It all started with the so-called Islamic revolution in Iran in 1979. The new sectarian rulers of Iran started exporting that revolution in many other regional countries. They started by creating their proxies, consisting of sectarian fanatics and terrorists, and provided them with all kinds of active support. As a result, the world saw states with states being created in the form of Hezbollah and Houthis. Multiple proxy groups were created in Iraq too. In countries like Pakistan, their proxies were unable to create a state within a state but they are able to cause instability in parts of the country (including GB, FATA, Balochistan, etc.)

These terrorist Irani proxies pose a serious threat to the regional security and global trade. World cannot simply over look or ignore the existence of these terrorist proxies and the threats that these proxies pose to the civilized world.

As I said just say anything!
Mods giving pro a long leash...

Anyhow... 1979 could have gone either way... communist or Clerical. It was US that suffered blowback of an earlier regime change that accepted to work with a Clerical Iran instead of a communist one... perhaps because they new that with Soviet backing that would tilt the balance of power in the region to pro Soviet. That sanctioned and isolated regime has been having the better of the collective?
Does Iran posses more resources, more bases, more proxies, more weapons, better technology?
None of it!

So shut up already!
That terror moniker is for the proxies of Saudi regime... the throat sliters, and takfiris they spawned!
In Yemen, they have these mercenaries fighting Houthis...
Mercenary is just the new jargon of the same old jaish regime... propped up all across the world...
Right after the revolution, they attacked Iran to undo the revolution and fragment the state... Saddam afterall wanted the Arab populated areas of Iran... the oil rich provinces.
Before that the collective was just strengthening zion to counter all Arabs... one defeat at a time and guess what Iran was another supporter in line along with puppet sheikhdoms... the statlets had just gotten their supposed freedom in early 70's and since then for one reason or another the Brits were swapped with American presence.
 
Is that even a new development? Hasn't there been Pakistani security forces stationed there already from before?
yes is always been nothing new development here . just Ispr confirm it to Cnn
 
  • Like
Reactions: Haz
As I said just say anything!
Mods giving pro a long leash...

Anyhow... 1979 could have gone either way... communist or Clerical. It was US that suffered blowback of an earlier regime change that accepted to work with a Clerical Iran instead of a communist one... perhaps because they new that with Soviet backing that would tilt the balance of power in the region to pro Soviet. That sanctioned and isolated regime has been having the better of the collective?
Does Iran posses more resources, more bases, more proxies, more weapons, better technology?
None of it!

So shut up already!
That terror moniker is for the proxies of Saudi regime... the throat sliters, and takfiris they spawned!
In Yemen, they have these mercenaries fighting Houthis...
Mercenary is just the new jargon of the same old jaish regime... propped up all across the world...
Right after the revolution, they attacked Iran to undo the revolution and fragment the state... Saddam afterall wanted the Arab populated areas of Iran... the oil rich provinces.
Before that the collective was just strengthening zion to counter all Arabs... one defeat at a time and guess what Iran was another supporter in line along with puppet sheikhdoms... the statlets had just gotten their supposed freedom in early 70's and since then for one reason or another the Brits were swapped with American presence.
I know some mods cannot take the reality and would try to silence such voices by blocking or banning members. It feels more of a sectarian forum than a forum for Pakistan. That's a separate issue though.

However, what I said is just the recent history. No one can deny the existence of Irani proxies of Hezbollah and Houthis. Same applies to several Irani proxies in Iraq too. People of Pakistan already know pretty well what terrorist Iranian proxies have done in Pakistan.

You can keep keep crying of anything and everything else but cannot deny or defy the ground realities.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top