Martial Law in Disguise 10 Years Imprisonment for Political Rallies in Pakistan

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cash gk

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Messages
5,958
Reaction score
5,775
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
Pakistan has taken a dark turn by passing a law that imposes a 10-year punishment for holding a political rally in Islamabad. This isn’t just an attack on freedom of expression; it’s a blatant declaration of martial law in disguise. Silencing political dissent and criminalising peaceful assembly are tactics of authoritarian regimes, not democracies. The government’s move to crush political opposition reveals the erosion of civil liberties and the rise of an unaccountable power structure. This is not just an assault on political activists but a grave threat to every citizen’s fundamental rights. Such draconian measures show a complete disregard for the rule of law, signalling that the voices of the people no longer matter. Pakistan’s leadership is taking the nation down a dangerous path where fear and repression replace dialogue and democracy. This is a clear warning: if we don't stand up now, the freedom to speak, protest, and demand change could be lost forever.
 
Source:
New law passed in senate
The only solution is mass/small protests, everywhere, everyday.. and then Islamabad. political class mustn't be afraid.
 
If 2 million people block Islamabad, how many can they arrest?
What is the jail capacity in Pakistan, they are already full.
 
This is next level
America, Britain, and France were superpowers. Have you ever seen this kind of spectacle on their channels?

Forget them; even in the Islamic country of Turkey, which has a history of caliphate, there were times when generals took over, but you never saw soldiers in uniform as anchors.

They brainwash our children, planting the image of the khaki uniform in their minds.
 
This is next level
America, Britain, and France were superpowers. Have you ever seen this kind of spectacle on their channels?

Forget them; even in the Islamic country of Turkey, which has a history of caliphate, there were times when generals took over, but you never saw soldiers in uniform as anchors.

They brainwash our children, planting the image of the khaki uniform in their minds.
This is a case of barking up the wrong tree when there are hundreds of other trees with known cats.

There are media relations officers and they do anchor certain military related events in the US, UK and Canada.
 
The only solution is mass/small protests, everywhere, everyday.. and then Islamabad. political class mustn't be afraid.
Won't work
Why?
Because unkike bengladesh or srilanka the military will open fire and kill Pakistanis
Just like rhey have done for several years and in 1971

Military is extension if british raj
 
Won't work
Why?
Because unkike bengladesh or srilanka the military will open fire and kill Pakistanis
Just like rhey have done for several years and in 1971

Military is extension if british raj
It's good for Pakistan if her population is reduced by half ....if I was Coas I would have done that .....no nonsense of freedom of expression and religion .all the mullahs would be send to heavens to enjoy the company of hoors and save the innocent kids from their loving embrace .
 
Pakistan has taken a dark turn by passing a law that imposes a 10-year punishment for holding a political rally in Islamabad. This isn’t just an attack on freedom of expression; it’s a blatant declaration of martial law in disguise. Silencing political dissent and criminalising peaceful assembly are tactics of authoritarian regimes, not democracies. The government’s move to crush political opposition reveals the erosion of civil liberties and the rise of an unaccountable power structure. This is not just an assault on political activists but a grave threat to every citizen’s fundamental rights. Such draconian measures show a complete disregard for the rule of law, signalling that the voices of the people no longer matter. Pakistan’s leadership is taking the nation down a dangerous path where fear and repression replace dialogue and democracy. This is a clear warning: if we don't stand up now, the freedom to speak, protest, and demand change could be lost forever.
Cash GK is a joke!
 

After Senate, NA adopts 'peaceful assembly' bill amid opposition's protest​

Bill proposes three-year imprisonment and unspecified fine to members of ‘unlawful assembly’

September 06, 2024

PTI supporters are seen amid tear gas smoke, used to disperse them, after the Election Commission disqualified former prime minister Imran Khan, during a protest in Islamabad on October 21, 2022. — Reuters
PTI supporters are seen amid tear gas smoke, used to disperse them, after the Election Commission disqualified former prime minister Imran Khan, during a protest in Islamabad on October 21, 2022. — Reuters


  • Public Order bill aims to regulate public gatherings in Islamabad.
  • Tarar says protests caused significant inconvenience to citizens.
  • Bill empowers district magistrate to regulate and ban assemblies.







ISLAMABAD: Following the approval from the Senate, the National Assembly (NA) on Friday passed the “Peaceful Assembly and Public Order Bill, 2024”, proposing up to three-year imprisonment for organising unauthorised rallies in Islamabad.

The bill, introduced by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) senior leader Danyal Chaudhary, aims to regulate public gatherings in the federal capital and ensure they do not disrupt public order.

Speaking on the floor of the lower house of parliament, Minister for Law and Justice Azam Nazeer Tarar said that the purpose of the bill is to maintain peace during public assemblies and processions.

He dismissed the opposition’s concerns, saying that the increasing number of demonstrations in the federal capital has caused significant inconvenience to citizens.

“The bill seeks to address these challenges while preserving the right to peaceful assembly,” the federal minister added.

Despite opposition from lawmakers of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC), the peaceful assembly was passed by a majority vote.

With approval from both houses of parliament, the bill will now be sent to President Asif Ali Zardari for final endorsement to become law.

The new bill empowers the district magistrate to regulate and ban public assemblies in the federal capital, proposing a punishment of up to three years or/and an unspecified fine to the members of an ‘unlawful assembly’

Meanwhile, it also proposed that repeat offenders will be liable to imprisonment for a term that may extend to 10 years.

As per a report published in The News, the bill bounds the event coordinator of an assembly to apply in writing to the district magistrate at least seven days before the intended date of the event.

Upon receipt of application, the district magistrate, before granting permission, would examine the prevailing law and order situation and obtain security clearance reports from the law-enforcement agencies.

The law also seeks to empower the government to designate a specific area of the Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) as a red zone or high-security zone, thereby prohibiting all types of assemblies in that area.

Likewise, according to it, a district magistrate would not permit any assembly in any area other than the defined, designated area and the assembly would proceed and take place at the specified locality or route, in the manner and during the times mentioned in the permission.

Whereas, the bill says a district magistrate would have the authority to impose a ban on any assembly within the ICT, if: (a) the assembly poses a risk to national security or public safety; (b) there are credible reports from law-enforcement agencies indicating a substantial risk of violence or public disorder; (c) the assembly would significantly disrupt the daily activities of the community, impede the movement of people and goods, or infringe upon fundamental right of citizens with regard to freedom of trade, business or profession guaranteed under Article 18 of the Constitution; or (d) another procession or assembly is already ongoing within the ICT, and the additional assembly would increase disruptions or pose additional security risks.

The bill says the ban on assembly under the proposed law would remain in force for the duration specified by the district magistrate, which may be extended if the conditions necessitating the ban persist.

“An officer-in-charge of a police station, on the instruction of the district magistrate, may command any assembly likely to disturb the public peace to disperse. It shall then be the duty of the members of such an assembly to comply and disperse accordingly,” it reads.



Factually incorrect thread opened by OP.
Continue here:

Closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top