Mumbai will surpass Shanghai by 2009

[arshu]

Can India just announce a date for landing on the Sun? The whole world is watching!

Dont worry we will create sun in china by nuking it .

 

[moonaman.varavayi]

Karachi also used to be sister of mumbai . Reaching shanghai level is not possible even for decades.

Mumbai has a higher GDP than Pakistan.

But Pakistanis will come here to laugh at India, because "China great".

 

[kankan326]

Better than having no choice at all.

"Stupid majority" exists in every society. They better have no choice at all.

 

[Lulldapull]

Mumbai has a higher GDP than Pakistan.

But Pakistanis will come here to laugh at India, because "China great".

Can't argue with you on dat.......no kidding!

 

[moonaman.varavayi]

"Stupid majority" exists in every society. They better have no choice at all.

And if the choice is taken away, you think the "enlightened minority" will automatically rule?

You won't find people who have the freedom to choose their leaders say that they don't want the choice.

Nobody says "Please take away my right to vote, and let me be ruled by whoever can seize power".

Only people who don't have that choice pretend that it is great to not have that choice.

 

[arshu]

And if the choice is taken away, you think the "enlightened minority" will automatically rule?

You won't find people who have the freedom to choose their leaders say that they don't want the choice.

Nobody says "Please take away my right to vote, and let me be ruled by whoever can seize power".

Only people who don't have that choice pretend that it is great to not have that choice.

For them it is working, they think it will work for all ,
It does not take time for a country to become like north korea .

 

[kankan326]

And if the choice is taken away, you think the "enlightened minority" will automatically rule?

You won't find people who have the freedom to choose their leaders say that they don't want the choice.

Nobody says "Please take away my right to vote, and let me be ruled by whoever can seize power".

Only people who don't have that choice pretend that it is great to not have that choice.

Yes. There is counterintuitive rule: People suffer more when they have more choices. Japan, S.Korea, Taiwan, China mainland, when these countries'(region) economy took off, they were all ruled by none elected leaders.

 

[moonaman.varavayi]

Yes. There is counterintuitive rule: People suffer more when they have more choices. Japan, S.Korea, Taiwan, China mainland, when these countries'(region) economy took off, they were all ruled by none elected leaders.

You were also ruled by non elected rulers when your economy and society was devastated.

Nobody can assert that Mao was a democratic leader. The great leap forward and the disastrous famines came under his rule.

The right to be ruled by someone you choose, and the right to hold the rulers accountable, is a sacred human right.

No more kings and other unelected rulers.

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

Dont worry we will create sun in china by nuking it .

and you're save from megaton class thermo-nuclear (Hydrogen bombs) from China lol

 

[kankan326]

You were also ruled by non elected rulers when your economy and society was devastated.

Nobody can assert that Mao was a democratic leader. The great leap forward and the disastrous famines came under his rule.

The right to be ruled by someone you choose, and the right to hold the rulers accountable, is a sacred human right.

No more kings and other unelected rulers.

Some thing you don't know. Mao is the founding father of China's industrialization. Industrialization is a painful change. You probably heard the world "industrial-agricultural scissors difference". Of course Chinese peasants paid a big cost for it. You only saw the cost, didn't see the output. China could produce things in Mao age while India can't today.

 

[ety]

Dont worry we will create sun in china by nuking it .

And China will send your shithole to the hell before you have the chance.

 

[Michael]

According to GaWC rankings assessing the status of cities as nodes within the global producer services network (covering sectors such as law, accounting, advertising, finance, and management consulting), Shanghai is classified as Alpha+, while Mumbai is classified as Alpha.

In the comprehensive city rankings based on the GFCI framework—which evaluates factors such as the scale of financial markets, regulatory environments, fintech capabilities, human capital, and the overall business environment—Shanghai ranks among the world's top ten financial centers. Mumbai, by contrast, failed to even make the list of Asia's top ten financial centers; in the global rankings of top financial hubs, Shanghai holds the 8th spot, while Mumbai ranks 52nd.

So why are we even discussing such a silly topic?

 

[moonaman.varavayi]

So why are we even discussing such a silly topic?

Because Chinese and Pakistani member never waste a chance to laugh at India.

Chinese because they are ahead of Indians, and Pakistanis because Chinese are ahead of Indians.

 

[ety]

According to GaWC rankings assessing the status of cities as nodes within the global producer services network (covering sectors such as law, accounting, advertising, finance, and management consulting), Shanghai is classified as Alpha+, while Mumbai is classified as Alpha.
View attachment 217315
In the comprehensive city rankings based on the GFCI framework—which evaluates factors such as the scale of financial markets, regulatory environments, fintech capabilities, human capital, and the overall business environment—Shanghai ranks among the world's top ten financial centers. Mumbai, by contrast, failed to even make the list of Asia's top ten financial centers; in the global rankings of top financial hubs, Shanghai holds the 8th spot, while Mumbai ranks 52nd.

So why are we even discussing such a silly topic?

And this ranking doesn't even consider things such as slums in the city, lol.

 

[Michael]

It is akin to comparing Thailand's HTMS *Chakri Naruebet* aircraft carrier with a *Gerald R. Ford*-class aircraft carrier; Although both are aircraft carriers, people will never consider them to be comparable.