Operation Ghazab Lil Haq (Pakistan - Afghanistan War)

Rational Philosopher said:
I really get the feeling the tempo here is very slow
Click to expand...
probably by design , like slowly slowly blowing eveything up to exert maximum pressure .also the iran situation has complicated it as per @AeronautIR
tbh i would rather we do it slowly , strike see what the intel says and then strike again .

Rational Philosopher said:
the tempo should be higher and target list more comprehensive - get rid of all military bases and conventional weapons.
Click to expand...
yes and then start to target infrastucture too , specially roads connecting afg to iran so they feel even pressure from border closure .
 
Rational Philosopher said:
I really get the feeling the tempo here is very slow... airstrikes against critical targets are very spaced out and after a week supposedly only 30% of NATO military left-overs are destroyed.

I'm not sure how comprehensive the target list is, does it include every kind of military hardware and infrastructure or only specific ones?

But right now it feels like reactive strikes every time there are clashes on the border, the tempo should be higher and target list more comprehensive - get rid of all military bases and conventional weapons.

The information coming out is also limited apart from certain strikes.

@hasssanali8998 @Panzerkiel What do you think?
Click to expand...

If its intended to be a long campaign the attacks will be more sporadic.

More targets will reveal themselves in time. Their skies are dominated and they are being watched.
 
Rational Philosopher said:
But right now it feels like reactive strikes every time there are clashes on the border
Click to expand...
i think these clashes are beneficial for us , apart from those incidences .

army should send more reinforcements , hunker down and let them come to you like zombies so that u can just slaughter them and destroy equipment safely .
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
hasssanali8998 said:
i think these clashes are beneficial , apart from those incidences .

army should send more reinforcements , hunker down and let them come to you like zombies so that u can just slaughter them and destroy equipment safely .
Click to expand...
Dominating ground clashes is good for breaking their morale because it signals you have them beat in all domains

I was just more worried about the slow-ish and sporadic pacing of airstrikes, and I guess worried if their target bank is limited to a small list or more comprehensive.

I don't mind draining them out slowly as long as the target bank is expansive and makes sure to eliminate everything, nothing left behind.
 
Rational Philosopher said:
target bank is expansive
Click to expand...
that will probbaly happen when we start to run out of these juicy depots and buildings left by US.
Rational Philosopher said:
slow-ish and sporadic pacing of airstrike
Click to expand...
it has been pretty regular imo , just kinda slowed down due to iran
we should also target tali outposts in NRF regions , basically helping them like us did for kurds ( not to that level but u get the point )
 
A quick question how long can the PA and PAF sustain this with the looming fuel shortage crisis?
 

Op Ghazab Lil Haq to go on until 'credible guarantees, concrete steps' by Kabul to halt terrorist support: state media​


Security sources says Afghan Taliban’s Brigade Headquarters of the 205 Corps destroyed in Kandahar airstrike

Web Desk
March 05, 2026

photo file


Security sources said that the ongoing Operation Ghazab Lil Haq would continue until "credible guarantees and concrete steps" by the Afghan Taliban to halt their support for terrorists against Pakistan, state-run Radio Pakistan reported on Thursday.

Pakistan is currently waging 'Operation Ghazab Lil Haq' that was launched late last Thursday after renewed clashes along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, when Afghan Taliban forces fired on multiple locations, prompting swift military retaliation. The neighbours have clashed along the frontier since last week, when Afghanistan launched a border offensive in response to Pakistani air strikes.

Chief of Defence Forces and Chief of the Army Staff Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir said a day ago that all necessary measures would be taken to neutralise the threat of terrorism emanating from across the border. He said the use of Afghan soil for acts of terrorism was unacceptable, adding that peace could only prevail between the two sides if the Afghan Taliban renounced their support for terrorism and terrorist organisations.

Radio Pakistan reported that in a briefing to journalists from various districts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa at the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) headquarters regarding the ongoing operation, "it was told that the Operation Ghazab Lil Haq is a continuation of Pakistan's ongoing war against terrorism and will continue until there are credible guarantees and concrete steps from the Afghan Taliban regime to end the sponsorship of terrorism."
 
IceCold said:
Let's hope so but remember we cannot exhaust all our resources because we have India to worry about.
Click to expand...
Operations are planned and executed keeping such contingencies in mind. This is taxing, without a doubt, but it is also part of the security posture.

Just keep in mind that we have been expending enormous resources fighting the insurgency on the back-foot. This has allowed Pakistan to be more proactive and direct force where its most needed. So perhaps from an expenditure standpoint, this is a better use of the resources.

Stocks will have to be replenished including POL etc. but they are also not being used up at the pace of a conventional war.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 12 (members: 0, guests: 12)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top