Operation Ghazab Lil Haq (Pakistan - Afghanistan War)

Taliban don't have much reserves

If they use something, it's difficult for them to replace, they don't have resources or sellers

So at most afghans can keep it up for a day or two and then they will just burn through stock and seek ceasefire

Pakistan for it's part doesn't want a war as it understands it's futile, nor does it want to heavily escalate and punish Afghanistan too much, it understands.it could cause more problems

But we are stuck and forced into this because of Afghan behaviour
Great post. Very much on point and accurate.

There are no ordnance factories in Afghanistan. Even their expenditure of small arms ammunition (5.56/7.62) is extremely taxing as they have to get it smuggled burning up hard cash when their economy is already cash strapped.

Artillery, whether it's left over 105mm, 130mm (not sure if they have any 155mm left), they have no way to sustain their fire against Pakistani positions. Even mortar rounds are probably being put together without any significant quality control and short in supply.

So beyond the noise, Taliban are in a pretty precarious situation thus such a dependence on TTP to put pressure on Pakistan. An active shooting war with Pakistan cannot even last a week with sustained firing on their side.
 
We need a friendly govt in Kabul. 2 front situation will murder us.

So question is who can replace Taliban? Remember the nationalists were even more anti-Pakistan & pro indians then these religious fanatics. I don't know if there's any group which is in center of both.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



Just a reminder, this is what we're facing.


the ceo of the above.

"Salaam,

Would your editor Roshan be able to clarify the below:

"My sympathies instinctively lie with the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan in their confrontation with the Pakistani military.

That said, I hate any Muslim on Muslim fight so pray this de-escalates."

Id love to hear more about why he is sympathetic in this case, towards a terror group who had launched suicide bombings this month in Pakistan, including ones you've reported on, such as attacks on mosques.

Alongside this, id also like to know why your editor is now sympathetic towards the IEA who launched an unprovoked attack on Pakistan, once again, killing and injuring numerous children.

Does 5 pillars stand by this sentiment, is this the official view of your company- that you believe the IEA is a right and just force, and that the attacks from them are warranted, and that Pakistan, who has suffered hundreds of deaths at the hands of Afghan terror does not have a right to self defence?

I am eagerly awaiting your response. "


Please also do message and ask for clarification.
 
=
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



Just a reminder, this is what we're facing.


the ceo of the above.


I have said this many times over the years.

They will only like you if you follow their lead.

They don't care about Kashmir.

If you don't care about Palestine then you are a bad Muslim and they will ostrichize but who cares about Kashmir right.

He is of Sri Lankan heritage which partly explains why.

Anyway who cares about his opinion, Pakistan has been chosen as the sword of Jesus. They will learn soon what Pakistan is and its destiny.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

They are firing grads now

whats interesting is the talibs having grad rockets that arent expired.

must have come from somewhere...
 
"Salaam,

Would your editor Roshan be able to clarify the below:

"My sympathies instinctively lie with the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan in their confrontation with the Pakistani military.

That said, I hate any Muslim on Muslim fight so pray this de-escalates."

Id love to hear more about why he is sympathetic in this case, towards a terror group who had launched suicide bombings this month in Pakistan, including ones you've reported on, such as attacks on mosques.

Alongside this, id also like to know why your editor is now sympathetic towards the IEA who launched an unprovoked attack on Pakistan, once again, killing and injuring numerous children.

Does 5 pillars stand by this sentiment, is this the official view of your company- that you believe the IEA is a right and just force, and that the attacks from them are warranted, and that Pakistan, who has suffered hundreds of deaths at the hands of Afghan terror does not have a right to self defence?

I am eagerly awaiting your response. "


Please also do message and ask for clarification.

Maybe another question can be added.

What kind of muslim organisation would support a group which bans muslim women education.
 
Exactly!

Afghanistan is not a small country. Throwing us into this 2 front situation is result of strategic blunders by Pakistan military from General Zia to till today. If you really want to fight a war then see how much readily available resources you have, pour billions and bring your military from every other front and get into war once and for all. But no, GHQ wants constant disturbance. With such war like situation, No one in country would even bother about overly due retirements, or elections or anything else at all. Even anyone questioning the policies would be called traitor.

I wonder why we are still FAILED in finding TTP leaders. We were failed finding OBL living under our own shadows. Its either incompetency OR its deliberately keeping things the way they are. GHQ stirs the pot and then watches reaction. If you really have resorted to kinetic actions then why keeping it to bare minimum? Why not use overwhelming force to convey a message (as you choose this strategy ) Its frustrating that GHQ wants to hang in between. Taliban will always get more confident with limited strikes. We had a chance to buy their people, start projects, we didn't do any effort whatsoever to have our influence grow on such an important front. We didn't even recognize the regime. IMO, we should have made an ally out of them, as we were the buffoons who sheltered them for years too against US. We facilitated talks, we treated their fighters. We lost a big way. We gifted india a strategic win without india firing a bullet. Now, whats the backup plan? limited stikes?? LOL! that's not working! If we have turned our former allies as enemy then we have to find replacement now and do the whole thing from scratch all over again. That prepare them, fund them to be Taliban replacement. You need to have a friendly govt in Kabul. Otherwise forever 2 front situation is dangerous.

Not going to read all that

Just say taliban k aagai ultai ho kar lait jao and that would work too
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top