I don’t remember unique speed being mentioned but unique flight trajectory. Can you share where it was quoted?@Bilal @farooqbhai @Panzerkiel
What Would u guys say about the term unique speed, r they hinting hypersonic speed??
Edit: found it.
I don’t remember unique speed being mentioned but unique flight trajectory. Can you share where it was quoted?@Bilal @farooqbhai @Panzerkiel
What Would u guys say about the term unique speed, r they hinting hypersonic speed??
Just looked up ISPR's statement on itI don’t remember unique speed being mentioned but unique flight trajectory. Can you share where it was quoted?
Edit: found it.
Yes, I think they are clearly saying it can defeat the defenses due to the unique trajectory and maneuverability. Missile defence depends on being able to predict where the object will be due to the nature of ballistic trajectory. If the missile is following unpredictable trajectory the missile defence would fail.Just looked up ISPR's statement on it
View attachment 40395
There is no mention of unique speed!!.
But still there is that mention of "defeating any missile defence system"
What qualities should a missile have to be labeled as such.
Can depressed or flat trajectory, evasive manouvers with high supersonic or speed should be hypersonic with the combination of the, i think ispr would not make any tall claims like that if the missile isn't hypersonic.
True, makes one think, was it a certain new capability being shown, or a certain new CGS? I'm confusedIf I'm not wrong this is the fastest we've gone from test fire to user trial.
The TEL seems interesting though. Even though they have paraded it they still blurred the TEL in both test videos.If I'm not wrong this is the fastest we've gone from test fire to user trial.
I think they even have 3 in service, 4 could be nearing end of development, This is just too fast, even if we r talking about digital engineering in play here.If I'm not wrong this is the fastest we've gone from test fire to user trial.
There is literally nothing to be secretive about those TELs!!The TEL seems interesting though. Even though they have paraded it they still blurred the TEL in both test videos.
Fatah series is being sped up. Fatah-II has glide trajectory which the ISPR is alluding towards. Fatah-I has some similarities with A-100 but Fatah-II is an indigenous design and product. Today's exercise was super impressive in terms of objectives met. There will be other variants which won't fall under MLRS.If I'm not wrong this is the fastest we've gone from test fire to user trial.
Fatah-1 and Fatah-2 GMRLS variants are there, then Fatah-2 SSM, Fatah-4 SSM and Fatah-3 SSM variant are in the SSM categoryFatah series is being sped up. Fatah-II has glide trajectory which the ISPR is alluding towards. Fatah-I has some similarities with A-100 but Fatah-II is an indigenous design and product. Today's exercise was super impressive in terms of objectives met. There will be other variants which won't fall under MLRS.
P.S: Fatah Series is reserved for conventional payload only.
will other variants fall under Hypersonic glide vehicle??Fatah series is being sped up. Fatah-II has glide trajectory which the ISPR is alluding towards. Fatah-I has some similarities with A-100 but Fatah-II is an indigenous design and product. Today's test was super impressive in terms of objectives met. There will be other variants which won't fall under MLRS.
Watch this space.Yet there’s no real investment in loitering munitions