PAF Conducts successful test of indigenously developed FAAZ BVRAAM

Ofcourse it will, but the missile would be equally as effective if its original developers would have been given their due credit.

So why the song and dance of claiming foriegn weapons as indigenously developed.
Some wierd rivalry you guys have with India.
Or is something that you guys want to prove to your people?
Why you people not doing mujra over Bra-Mos 56 dd?
images
 
It up to you, to believe what you want.

"But if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck"
Ok, so your power of discerning starts and ends at whether it’s pointy or not. Got it.
 
The other variable worth tracking is what we develop ourselves. There is technology that is very sensitive and tightly controlled for every country, so the only way to develop it is to create the underlying R&D infrastructure or manufacturing systems ourselves. As the Turks increasingly lean into this to drive their rockets (including SLVs) or ramjet and scramjet programs, we will likely follow or collaborate with them.

In other words, IMO, we'll see the New Labs or PINSTECH equivalent of in-house CNC, instrumentation, and other critical equipment. There's no other way but to develop things we need in the future.
The core techs are material and semi conductors. CNC and composite related equipment can pretty much be sourced from China and Turkey now.
 
The entire Faaz family of BVRAAMs, is in reality, the Umkhonto family of BVRAAMs developed by South Africa’s Denel Dynamics.


View attachment 222458
View attachment 222460

View attachment 222461
View attachment 222463


So limited to no home production. What gives any country edge is their production capability. Look at Russia-Ukraine war. No one can sustain or win a war by buying weapons. So more optics than anything else.
 
And your powers of comprehension apparently don't extend beyond taking an analogy literally.

The point was the unmistakable resemblance, not just the shape of its nose. But I suppose addressing the actual argument would be considerably more demanding.
Ok, please elaborate on all the “unmistakable” resemblance that you found with your keen sense of observation.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top