PAF J-10CE News, Updates and Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is Pakistan's legitimate right. China's J-10CE, J-35, PL-10E, PL-15E and other air combat weapons are open to PAF. If PAF needs them, they can place orders at any time. China's military industrial enterprises can fully guarantee the quality of products and delivery time.

But, I would be very happy if PAF can place an order for J-35 this year.
Someone will buy me a big dinner for the result.LOL......
Why too increase J10 numbers if we want J35 , we should invest in them and to fill numbers JFT 17 B3 are Good enough
 
Deino, I have started to notice you have transitioned from an impartial China reporter to a Indian-biased pro-Pakistani and by extension pro-China.

I'd be extremely sorry about that, and I hope your assumption isn't just based on posting this truly great photo?

Politically, I actually consider myself neutral; I don't understand the political backgrounds and current machinations of both actors sufficiently. Even if it's true that Modi, with his nationalist-Hindu approach, de facto Nazi structures, and ideology hidden behind the label "we, the greatest democracy!", are helping the West against China, it's worrying because it's simply hypocritical.

As for my anti-Indian stance, it's more since I fundamentally hate boasting, bragging, and grandiose promises – often with a nationalist tinge – that are never achievable!
 
Why too increase J10 numbers if we want J35 , we should invest in them and to fill numbers JFT 17 B3 are Good enough
I’m guessing PAF will want at least 2 operational squadrons of the J10 to justify the maintenance & support set up. I also still believe that the 2 distinct cammo schemes are eventually intended for 2 separate squadrons. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong but I’ve never before seen 2 different cammo schemes in the same PAF squadron unless it was during a transition period.
 
Why too increase J10 numbers if we want J35 , we should invest in them and to fill numbers JFT 17 B3 are Good enough
Different types of fighters serve different purposes. They have not been able to replace each other so far.

In the current air combat system, 4th/4.5th-Gen fighters cannot be completely replaced by 5th-Gen fighters. And, of course, vice versa.

Typically, a modern Air Force tactical formation consists of a mix of 4th/4.5th-Gen and 5th-Gen fighters, plus one AEW&C, and the number of 4th/4.5th-Gen fighters is usually double to triple the number of 5th-Gen fighters. You can use the fighter configuration of the US Navy's Ford-class carriers as a reference.

The 5th-Gen fighters also have a Beast mode, but they usually come without any external weapons/fuel tanks. Especially when in combat mode.

The JF-17B3 and J-10CE are also not interchangeable. Light fighters and medium fighters have their own different niche. In the PAF's daily air patrol/vigilance mission, the JF-17B3 offers a better price/performance ratio than the J-10CE, which offers a higher payload and air combat performance than the JF-17B3.

PAF's J-35, J-10CE, and JF-17B3 can be configured in roughly 1:2:3 quantities. Of course, this has to do with PAF's budget.

But what the current PAF lacks the most, is a dedicated electronic warfare aircraft (similar to the J-16D/J-15D function). Chinese social media once revealed that the J-10C has a dedicated electronic warfare improved model(Allegedly internally coded as EJ-10), however, the PLAAF did not end up equipping this type of fighter(The PLAAF employs an external electronic warfare pod for the J-10C.).PAF could consider stepping into the program. After further improvements and upgrades to it, introduce it to PAF.
1746194565990.png
 
Last edited:
But what the current PAF lacks the most, is a dedicated electronic warfare aircraft (similar to the J-16D/J-15D function). Chinese social media once revealed that the J-10C has a dedicated electronic warfare improved model(Allegedly internally coded as EJ-10), however, the PLAAF did not end up equipping this type of fighter(The PLAAF employs an external electronic warfare pod for the J-10C.).PAF could consider stepping into the program. After further improvements and upgrades to it, introduce it to PAF.
Again, talking about stuff you dont know about.

Why does PAF need fighter based jammers?
1746200410905.png
Do you see the size of Pakistan?

The PAF chooses standoff jammers in the form of bizjets because simply- they're better. They dont need fighter based jammers because the use of stand off jammers creates a widespread corridor outside of adversary MEZ. Also offering full spectrum protection.
Using J-10 based electronic attack platforms are at best useful for escort duties and also SEAD- But the PAF can once again, use dedicated SOJ's for this exact purpose, for any deep strike missions, they will rely on external pods to provide escort jamming.
1746200677211.png1746200704875.png
1746200842985.png
 
PAF's last order totaled 20 J-10CEs, all of which have been delivered.
As of now, there is no reliable information that PAF has placed an additional order for the J-10CE.

Of course, I don't rule out the existence of hidden orders.

If any of you have a professional-grade satellite imagery service, keep an eye on the production plant tarmac. ------ Production of the J-10CE has been moved from the CAC Chengdu factory to the Guiyang factory.

There have been no recent developments in Chinese social media.
The order of J10ce is placed by Imran Khan goverment, he is a true hero of Pakistan people and a great friend of Chinese people.
 
Again, talking about stuff you dont know about.

Why does PAF need fighter based jammers?
View attachment 116219
Do you see the size of Pakistan?

The PAF chooses standoff jammers in the form of bizjets because simply- they're better. They dont need fighter based jammers because the use of stand off jammers creates a widespread corridor outside of adversary MEZ. Also offering full spectrum protection.
Using J-10 based electronic attack platforms are at best useful for escort duties and also SEAD- But the PAF can once again, use dedicated SOJ's for this exact purpose, for any deep strike missions, they will rely on external pods to provide escort jamming.
View attachment 116221View attachment 116222
View attachment 116224
The PAF could also look at augmenting the SOJs with decoys equipped with jamming equipment. These smaller jammers can accompany the fighters while also doubling as small cruise missiles. Pakistan already has the inputs to make this happen.
 
Said 2 PAF j10ce confronted with 4 IAF Rafale along LOC of Kashmir two days ago?
 
Said 2 PAF j10ce confronted with 4 IAF Rafale along LOC of Kashmir two days ago?
Someone said in the other thread that it was jf-17b3 and f-16 if I remember correctly, no j10ces were deployed in that area they said at the time
 
Someone said in the other thread that it was jf-17b3 and f-16 if I remember correctly, no j10ces were deployed in that area they said at the time
J10ce station at Kamra airbase is not far from the border.
 
Credits:

vi-va


True, but there are rumor that Egypt will get meteor.
Also MBDA SCALP cruise missile appeared for the first time in official Egyptian military media.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


sldinfo.com

France and the Sale of Rafale to Egypt: Sans Meteor - Second Line of Defense

By Pierre Tran Paris – France withheld the sale of the Meteor long-range, air-to-air missile to Egypt in response to a request from Israel, an arms specialist said. That French decision to forego an order for the Meteor missile differed from an initial withholding of the Scalp cruise missile to...
sldinfo.com
sldinfo.com

Egyptian Air Force displays SCALP cruise missile

An MBDA SCALP cruise missile appeared for the first time in official Egyptian military media when one was seen in a 2 February video of a joint exercise with the French...
www.janes.com

what's the purpose to acquire Rafale when Meteo is unavailable, sometimes I don't understand Egypt. keep buying western water down weapon system while claiming Israel is a bully?
 
Modi is a 56inches chest pu$$y, he said it's Indian Army chief's decision whether to launch a war in retaliation against Pakistan , and Indian Army refused to do so.........Bharat is a joke
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top