PAF J-10CE News, Updates and Discussion

[m52k85]

Their language was “at least 2”

Dont expect him understand the intricacies of linguistics, it is out of his reach, given the country he comes from.

 

[tman786]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Check the comments from non Pakistanis... Absolutely hilarious

 

[wanglaokan]

Pakistan defence minister is kinda senile I don't think he knows difference between JF17 and J10

come on man , you must be joking

 

[ghazi52]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[m52k85]

come on man , you must be joking

He's not joking. Pakistani politicians will say different things at different times, sometimes contradict each other when it comes to technicalities of airforce equipment and workings. Even the army spokesman has been wrong in the past on the more intricate details. How the operations happened, what equipment was used etc, wait for a PAF source. Usually a retired PAF. See this:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

This particular retired PAF is currently the top source, he doesnt give out much information, but when he does we know it is legit (in the past it was Kaiser Tufail).

 

[Tejas Spokesman]

Their language was “at least 2”

That means US has not found any proof of claim no. 1, claim no 2 and claim no.3
Thanks to this US statement, all neutral analysts will also now report that Indian confirmed fighter losses were only 2 (which so far appears to be the actual number, one in Ramban and one in Bhatinda, plus one Heron in Akhnoor, and Pampore being just a pair of jettisoned drop tanks).

 

[TF8]

That means US has not found any proof of claim no. 1, claim no 2 and claim no.3
Thanks to this US statement, all neutral analysts will also now report that Indian confirmed fighter losses were only 2 (which so far appears to be the actual number, one in Ramban and one in Bhatinda, plus one Heron in Akhnoor, and Pampore being just a pair of jettisoned drop tanks).

Till yesterday Indians were denying any kill. Now you have accepted 2. Give it some time, you’ll come around for the others as well.

 

[TF8]

For the first time the thread is silent for a few hours.

 

[Oscar]

That means US has not found any proof of claim no. 1, claim no 2 and claim no.3
Thanks to this US statement, all neutral analysts will also now report that Indian confirmed fighter losses were only 2 (which so far appears to be the actual number, one in Ramban and one in Bhatinda, plus one Heron in Akhnoor, and Pampore being just a pair of jettisoned drop tanks).

Well if by neutral analysis you mean the meta, X and other suppressed news by your kind - sure.

 

[majesticpug]

AT LEAST TWO

View attachment 118229

Why would anybody still regard the words of the US authoritative? LOL... We in the US know how much to believe and how much to discount. Words on sensitive subject like this is less than 10% valid. Wake the F up. Jesus Santa Maria.

 

[MirageV3ff]

Chinese social media creating J-10C waifus out here man

 

[KingQamaR]

Indians defending Rafale. While Rafale couldn’t defend them. It’s hilarious.

 

[iblini]

@Indos I saw some Korean mocking Indonesia's Rafale purchased in their youtube news comment section, is there some beef between two countries?

 

[Michael]

Regarding the maximum range of the PL-15E:

As I recall, when the maximum range of the PL-15E was first officially announced, the description read “Maximum range >=145KM”.

Later, many media quoted the description as “Maximum range = 145KM”.

Yesterday, the official reiterated that the maximum range of PL-15E is >145KM.

Sina Visitor System

So, the controversy about the PL-15E's maximum range of 145KM can be terminated!

 

[wanglaokan]