PAF pilot highlights how chinese J10C fighters have left US F16's Obsolete

[jr_pdf]

Then send the J-10C to the Middle East and see what will happen against the Israeli or Turkish Air Forces

Next gen platforms are transforming the F-16 from a standalone combat aircraft into a node within a massive network-centric warfare system. Thanks to this integration, a Turkish Air Force F-16 gains a decisive asymmetric advantage in BVR combat

Radar network with HAKIM AI powered sensor fusion ( C4ISR )
-- Boeing E-7T AEWC
-- ALP-300G ealy warning AESA Radar
-- MURAD-100 AESA Radar on the KIZILELMA and ANKA-3
-- IRST on the KIZILELMA , ANKA-3 , AKINCI


Electronic Warfare with the ASOJ-23A jammer Aircraft
Under normal conditions, an AEWC can detect an F-16 at a distance of 350 km. however, when subjected to active ASOJ-23A jamming Aircraft , its detection range can shrink to less than 100–120 km

The ASOJ-23A does not merely blind radars. it also possesses Communications Electronic Attack capabilities. Even if an AEWC manages to detect a F-16, the ASOJ-23A can jamming the tactical data link networks that transmit this information to J-10Cs

Also , Uplink jamming performed by the ASOJ-23A, can prevent the Satellites from obtaining a clear radar image of that area within 400 km to protect the F-16s


MUM-T concept with the KIZILELMA and ANKA-3
Turkish F-16 was the first Fighter Jet in the world that flew with an unarmed stealth Fighter Jet , that means even ANKA-3 to fire BVR Missile to destroy a J-10C from safe distance



F-16 is not fight alone
also , Turkish F-16s have EHSIM RF decoy to protect the Platform from RF guided Missiles like PL-15 , PL-17 .... ( only USA , Turkiye and Israel )


dont compare Israeli-Turkish Air Forces with the Indian Air Force which lack technology and next gen war concept

Bro, we all know Turkey isn't Israel, and we all know Israel controls the US. Let me show you what real system-of-systems warfare looks like. If you have doubts, you can verify it with American AI

Statistical scope	Estimated number	Source/Date	Notes
ISR Satellites	More than 510	U.S. Space Force assessment, as of July 2026	This is the figure most frequently cited by the Pentagon and the U.S. military; it refers to satellites with intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities, including dual-use military-civilian systems
Imaging, navigation, and signals intelligence payloads	595	The Wall Street Journal	This is the number of payloads, not satellite platforms; it covers three major categories—imaging, navigation, and signals intelligence—and explicitly includes dual-use military-civilian satellites
Reconnaissance satellites, all types combined	At least 245	International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), London	This includes 92 remote-sensing satellites and 81 electronic intelligence/signal-detection satellites

Let me say it again: Chinese satellites filmed and tracked an F-22 in real time throughout its flight, just like a drone tracking infantry. Your tactical system is worthless against a strategic-level system. The J-10C doesn't even need to turn on its radar—it can silently launch a PL-17 to your vicinity, and then the PL-17 will hunt for targets on its own and destroy your entire air force.

 

[MH.Yang]

Because in a real war, it is not a single platform that will fight, but an entire system of systems


I described a possible scenario against all of China's military technology, not just the J-10C

I added the Jilin-1 constellation Satellites + AEWC to the J-10C team

Because in a real war, it is not a single platform that will fight, but an entire system of systems


I described a possible scenario against all of China's military technology, not just the J-10C

I added the Jilin-1 constellation Satellites + AEWC to the J-10C team

----------------------------------------------------------------

F-16 vs J-10C
China would have the advantage in its own region, while Turkiye and Israel would have the advantage in theirs with network centric warfare+Jammer Aircraft+MUM-T concept

You have been deliberately ignoring that China has a better early warning aircraft KJ-3000 than the E7T. Even though KJ-3000 is prohibited from export, KJ-500 still has the same level of performance as E-7T. And you also ignored China's SOJ. Your preset battlefield is to use the lowest level J-10C aircraft in the Chinese fleet, which only undertakes homeland defense tasks, to one-on-one combat the entire NATO air combat system, including the E7T and SOJ. Your behavior precisely demonstrates your inner fear of China's complete aerial combat system, afraid to compare it with the complete one.

 

[KingQamaR]

In terms of combat experience and cost-effectiveness, the AK-47 assault rifle (including its clones and derivatives) arguably ranks first in the world; no other assault rifle can truly compare to it in these respects.

Does that mean we should always choose it?

No one denies the past glory of the F-16 fighter jet. But its era has come to an end!

Unfortunately, this is a blind spot in the Indian worldview.

Despite their constant clamor for "independence and self-reliance," their worldview has never truly embraced the concept. Opportunism is in their very nature!

Its been constantly upgraded, so while the initial design was old, it was fly-by-wire at the start so upgrading it to digital made it a solid platform, plus it has something technology cannot buy, its battle tested and proven itself in many campaigns. Perfect air combat fighter probably best 4th Gen fighter . Now its rumoured Lockheed Martin are going to built a newer advanced F16.

 

[MMM-E]

Let me say it again: Chinese satellites filmed and tracked an F-22 in real time throughout its flight, just like a drone tracking infantry. Your tactical system is worthless against a strategic-level system

Bro , Our ASOJ-23A stand off Jammer Aircraft is not tactical System but a strategic game changer System

and ASOJ-23A jammer Aircraft can jam Radars , datalinks , PL-17 Missile and Satellites within range of 400 km to protect the F-16s

this technology is belong to only USA , Turkiye , China and Russia currently
Israeli System is under development

The J-10C doesn't even need to turn on its radar—it can silently launch a PL-17 to your vicinity, and then the PL-17 will hunt for targets on its own and destroy your entire air force.

Turkish F-16s also can turn off its Radar to use REDNET Radar newtwork with HAKIM AI powered sensor fusion ( C4ISR ) to detect the J-10Cs ( Radar+IRST)
and fire BVR missiles from multiple Platforms including ANKA-3 and KIZILELMA unmanned stealth Fighter Jets .... J-10C can not survive


btw , I am saying again
Turkish F-16s have EHSIM RF decoy to protect the Platform from RF guided Missiles like PL-15 , PL-17 .... ( USA , Turkiye , Israel uses this technology in their F-16s )


dont compare Israeli-Turkish Air Forces with the Indian Air Force which lack technology and next gen war concept

 

[MH.Yang]

Bro , Our ASOJ-23A stand off Jammer Aircraft is not tactical System but a strategic game changer System

and ASOJ-23A jammer Aircraft can jam Radars , datalinks , PL-17 Missile and Satellites within range of 400 km to protect the F-16s




Turkish F-16s also can turn off its Radar to use REDNET Radar newtwork with HAKIM AI powered sensor fusion ( C4ISR ) to detect the J-10Cs ( Radar+IRST)
and fire BVR missiles from multiple Platforms including ANKA-3 and KIZILELMA unmanned stealth Fighter Jets .... J-10C can not survive


btw , I am saying again
Turkish F-16s have EHSIM RF decoy to protect the Platform from RF guided Missiles like PL-15 , PL-17 .... ( USA , Turkiye , Israel uses this technology in their F-16s )
View attachment 217049

dont compare Israeli-Turkish Air Forces with the Indian Air Force which lack technology and next gen war concept

AI's judgment is a crushing defeat for the NATO system.

 

[MMM-E]

Real military experts laughs on Chinese claims that the KJ-3000 detect the F-16 from 600-1000 km away ( including AI programs )

The KJ-3000 AEWC radar signal cannot physically reach the F-16
To detect a target beyond 600 km, the KJ-3000 would need to fly at the edge of space, which is impossible

The KJ-3000 can detect the F-16 from 400 km , not 600-1000 km

 

[MH.Yang]

Real military experts laughs on Chinese claims that the KJ-3000 detect the F-16 from 600-1000 km away ( including AI programs )

The KJ-3000 AEWC radar signal cannot physically reach the F-16
To detect a target beyond 600 km, the KJ-3000 would need to fly at the edge of space, which is impossible

The KJ-3000 can detect the F-16 from 400 km , not 600-1000 km

Let the AI chat with you. I'm tired.

 

[Michael]

Its been constantly upgraded, so while the initial design was old, it was fly-by-wire at the start so upgrading it to digital made it a solid platform, plus it has something technology cannot buy, its battle tested and proven itself in many campaigns. Perfect air combat fighter probably best 4th Gen fighter . Now its rumoured Lockheed Martin are going to built a newer advanced F16.

Bro, that kind of thinking is outdated and out of touch with reality.

A fighter jet is a comprehensive system.

When we speak of a specific fighter model, we are usually referring primarily to the airframe platform.
The airframe itself serves merely as a host; it is the technology within its subsystems that determines actual combat capability, though the airframe does impose constraints on those subsystems.

Typically, when a fighter is developed, the airframe platform is designed with room for future subsystem upgrades. Consequently, the initial version of the aircraft often features subsystems that lag behind the potential of the airframe itself—a pattern seen in early J-20 variants, as well as the current KAAN and KF-21.

Subsequently, while the airframe undergoes no major structural changes, development of the subsystems intensifies until a balance is struck between the two. The current J-20A is referred to as the "fully realized" version, signifying that this equilibrium has been achieved.

Decisions regarding further development are made based on requirements. If the choice is made to continue upgrading subsystems, compromises may arise at the subsystem level; specifically, the airframe platform may limit the full performance potential of more advanced subsystems. The JF-17 Block 3 serves as a classic example of this.
Ideally, superior subsystems are paired with superior airframes to achieve a perfect match. However, when such options are unavailable, integrating advanced subsystem technology into an older airframe remains a viable approach.

For instance, regarding the J-10C fighter platform, we can envision the following possibilities:

1. Equipping it with the WS-15 engine. This would make an electronic warfare (EW) variant based on the J-10C platform entirely feasible. It would even be fully viable to develop a twin-seat version of the J-10C to serve as a command aircraft for Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T) operations.

2. China has already driven down the cost of stealth metamaterial skins to rock-bottom levels. There would be no issue whatsoever with applying this material to the J-10C.

3. Recent reports indicate that China has achieved a breakthrough in the mass production of gallium oxide radar chips. It is entirely feasible to incorporate this cutting-edge technology into the J-10C.

......

There are many similar proposals, and there are absolutely no technical obstacles to implementing them.

The only issue is: it simply isn't worth it!

 

[MMM-E]

AI REPORT

The KJ-3000 AEWC cannot detect an F-16 from 600–1000 km away.
While Chinese military literature often claims a maximum radar detection range of up to 1,000 km

1. The Target's Size (Radar Cross Section)

• The 1000 km Myth: A radar's maximum range is calculated using massive targets, such as a B-52 strategic bomber, a large aerial refueling tanker, or a commercial airliner, which have a Radar Cross Section (RCS) of over 40–100 m².
  
  
• The F-16's Reality: An F-16 is a very compact, aerodynamically clean fighter jet with an RCS of only 1 to 5 m². Because it reflects very little radar energy, the KJ-3000's realistic detection range for an F-16 is estimated to be between 350 and 450 km under optimal conditions.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

2. The Radar Horizon (Curvature of the Earth)

• Radars operate on a strict line-of-sight basis because electromagnetic waves travel in straight lines. However, the Earth is curved.

• Even if the KJ-3000 is cruising at a high altitude of 30,000 feet (approx. 9,100 meters) and the F-16 is also flying high, at a distance of 600–1000 km, the F-16 will be physically hidden behind the curvature of the Earth (below the radar horizon). For a radar wave to reach an object 1,000 km away on a straight path, that object would have to be flying in the upper atmosphere or near-space.

 

[MH.Yang]

AI REPORT

The KJ-3000 AEWC cannot detect an F-16 from 600–1000 km away.
While Chinese military literature often claims a maximum radar detection range of up to 1,000 km

1. The Target's Size (Radar Cross Section)

• The 1000 km Myth: A radar's maximum range is calculated using massive targets, such as a B-52 strategic bomber, a large aerial refueling tanker, or a commercial airliner, which have a Radar Cross Section (RCS) of over 40–100 m².
  
  
• The F-16's Reality: An F-16 is a very compact, aerodynamically clean fighter jet with an RCS of only 1 to 5 m². Because it reflects very little radar energy, the KJ-3000's realistic detection range for an F-16 is estimated to be between 350 and 450 km under optimal conditions.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

2. The Radar Horizon (Curvature of the Earth)

• Radars operate on a strict line-of-sight basis because electromagnetic waves travel in straight lines. However, the Earth is curved.

• Even if the KJ-3000 is cruising at a high altitude of 30,000 feet (approx. 9,100 meters) and the F-16 is also flying high, at a distance of 600–1000 km, the F-16 will be physically hidden behind the curvature of the Earth (below the radar horizon). For a radar wave to reach an object 1,000 km away on a straight path, that object would have to be flying in the upper atmosphere or near-space.

AI says you are lying, and what you posted is not an AI report at all, because there are obvious calculation and data errors, No AI could possibly make this mistake.

 

[Michael]

Let the AI chat with you. I'm tired.

Why bother arguing with that famous fool?

He is comparing his imaginary "PPT-only" product against old Chinese products from over a decade ago.

Does that make any sense?

Blocking him outright is the wise choice!

 

[HERO]

Why bother arguing with that famous fool?

He is comparing his imaginary "PPT-only" product against old Chinese products from over a decade ago.

Does that make any sense?

Blocking him outright is the wise choice!

Turkey's military power is number one in the world! That's the sentence he wants! As for what the actual situation is, he doesn't care! There's no need to keep talking with him!

 

[MH.Yang]

Why bother arguing with that famous fool?

He is comparing his imaginary "PPT-only" product against old Chinese products from over a decade ago.

Does that make any sense?

Blocking him outright is the wise choice!

I am waiting for tonight's football match, Norway vs Spain, Haaland vs C.Ronaldo. I am a fan of C.Ronaldo. I don't mind wasting some time before this.

 

[MMM-E]

AI says you are lying, and what you posted is not an AI report at all, because there are obvious calculation and data errors, No AI could possibly make this mistake.

And Google AI says you are lying



so KJ-3000 can not detect the F-16 from 600-1000 km
but 350-450 km

American AI doesnt care about Chinese claims

 

[HERO]

Google AI says
View attachment 217063
View attachment 217064

so KJ-3000 can not detect the F-16 from 600-1000 km
but 350-450 km

American AI doesnt care about Chinese claims

Turkey's military power is number one in the world! Satisfied now?!